POLISCOPE
Back to bills

The civic record

Read. Follow. Verify.
Did Not Advance

Rhode Island bill allows parties to condition electronic transactions on receiving written copies in English or Spanish

Original title: AN ACT RELATING TO STATE AFFAIRS AND GOVERNMENT -- UNIFORM ELECTRONIC TRANSACTIONS ACT (Allows a party to condition a transaction by electronic means on their stated desire to obtain and receive a written copy of the document in English or Spanish before electronic execution of the agreement or performance is required of the party.)

Last action · May 21, 2026: Committee recommended measure be held for further studySponsors: Pam Lauria and 10 others

Introduced
Committee
Floor Vote
Passed
Law

Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.

Public stanceCommunity reactions are separate from the official record and reporting.

What This Bill Proposed

Rhode Island legislation permits individuals to condition any electronic transaction on receiving a written copy of the agreement in either English or Spanish before signing electronically or fulfilling performance obligations.

Why it matters

Provides residents with the legal right to demand physical paperwork in specific languages prior to being bound by digital contracts, impacting how businesses execute online and electronic agreements.

Who It Would Have Affected

Groups the bill's text would have affected, as described in the record. Being affected is not a position for or against it.

Directly affected

consumers

Consumers gain the right to request and receive written copies of electronic agreements in English or Spanish prior to executing them.

Directly affected

businesses utilizing electronic contracts

Businesses must accommodate requests from parties seeking physical written copies in English or Spanish before electronic contract execution or performance.

Key Facts

You don't have to trust us. Each fact below is taken straight from the official document - click any one to see the exact passage, highlighted in the original.

Frequently Asked Questions

What does this bill allow a party to do in an electronic transaction?
It allows a party to condition the transaction on their stated desire to obtain and receive a written copy of the document in English or Spanish before or performance.
Which languages are specified for the written copies?
English or Spanish.

What else do you want to know?

News Coverage

No news coverage found yet. Articles are indexed twice daily.

Where This Stands

This bill did not become law - Died at adjournment · in Senate committee.

Procedural history

3 actions
  1. May 21, 2026
    Committee recommended measure be held for further study
  2. May 15, 2026
    Scheduled for hearing and/or consideration (05/21/2026)
  3. Mar 4, 2026Introduced
    Introduced, referred to Senate Judiciary

Version history

Only one version on file - nothing to compare yet. As later stages (committee substitute, engrossed, enrolled) are captured, the redline appears here.

View official text →

Lobbying Activity

No state lobbying filings in our records match this bill. Federal lobbying reports (LDA) cover Congress, so they are not listed on state bills.

Full breakdown

Who this bill affects and the strongest case for and against it, written only from the bill’s own text.

Sponsors

Connected Entities

Tiara Mack, Alana DiMario, Bridget Valverde and 8 more
PersonTiara Mack“Cosponsor of the bill”Map →
PersonAlana DiMario“Cosponsor of the bill”Map →
PersonBridget Valverde“Cosponsor of the bill”Map →
PersonMeghan Kallman“Cosponsor of the bill”Map →
PersonPam Lauria“Primary sponsor of Senate Bill 2965”Map →
PersonJonathon Acosta“Cosponsor of the bill”Map →
PersonRyan Pearson“Cosponsor of the bill”Map →
PersonLori Urso“Cosponsor of the bill”Map →
PersonLammis Vargas“Cosponsor of the bill”Map →
PersonLinda Ujifusa“Cosponsor of the bill”Map →
PersonMelissa Murray“Cosponsor of the bill”Map →

Sources

Open source document

status.rilegislature.gov

Analysis Score

0–100
  • Significance20
    Lowered because this bill did not pass (its text scored 45)
  • Controversy15
    Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
  • Entertainment5
    Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
  • Buzz20
    Current news / social attention level

Publisher tools

Share or embed this record

POLISCOPE publisher tools

Share or embed this record