The civic record
Read. Follow. Verify.Rhode Island bill allows parties to condition electronic transactions on receiving written copies in English or Spanish
Last action · May 21, 2026: Committee recommended measure be held for further studySponsors: Pam Lauria and 10 others
Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.
What This Bill Proposed
Rhode Island legislation permits individuals to condition any electronic transaction on receiving a written copy of the agreement in either English or Spanish before signing electronically or fulfilling performance obligations.
Provides residents with the legal right to demand physical paperwork in specific languages prior to being bound by digital contracts, impacting how businesses execute online and electronic agreements.
Who It Would Have Affected
Groups the bill's text would have affected, as described in the record. Being affected is not a position for or against it.
consumers
Consumers gain the right to request and receive written copies of electronic agreements in English or Spanish prior to executing them.
businesses utilizing electronic contracts
Businesses must accommodate requests from parties seeking physical written copies in English or Spanish before electronic contract execution or performance.
Key Facts
You don't have to trust us. Each fact below is taken straight from the official document - click any one to see the exact passage, highlighted in the original.
Frequently Asked Questions
What does this bill allow a party to do in an electronic transaction?
Which languages are specified for the written copies?
What else do you want to know?
News Coverage
Follow the record
Votes, people, money & the original sourceWhere This Stands
This bill did not become law - Died at adjournment · in Senate committee.
Procedural history
3 actions- May 21, 2026Committee recommended measure be held for further study
- May 15, 2026Scheduled for hearing and/or consideration (05/21/2026)
- Mar 4, 2026IntroducedIntroduced, referred to Senate Judiciary
Version history
Only one version on file - nothing to compare yet. As later stages (committee substitute, engrossed, enrolled) are captured, the redline appears here.
View official text →Lobbying Activity
No state lobbying filings in our records match this bill. Federal lobbying reports (LDA) cover Congress, so they are not listed on state bills.
Full breakdown
Who this bill affects and the strongest case for and against it, written only from the bill’s own text.
Sponsors
Show 6 more sponsors
Connected Entities
Sources
status.rilegislature.gov
Analysis Score
0–100- Significance20Lowered because this bill did not pass (its text scored 45)
- Controversy15Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
- Entertainment5Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
- Buzz20Current news / social attention level
Publisher tools
