The civic record
Read. Follow. Verify.Proposed Restrictions on DHS Funding for Colleges Linked to Confucius Institutes
Last action · May 8, 2025: Received in the Senate and Read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs.Sponsors: August Pfluger and 5 others
Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.
What This Bill Would Do
This bill would prohibit colleges and universities from receiving Department of Homeland Security (DHS) funding if they maintain contracts, agreements, or receive gifts from Confucius Institutes, the Thousand Talents Program, or specific Chinese entities of concern. Institutions could regain eligibility for federal funds by terminating these relationships.
If enacted, this bill would force colleges to choose between maintaining partnerships with specific Chinese-funded entities and receiving federal research or security grants from the Department of Homeland Security starting 12 months after the law's passage.
- Confucius Institutes are cultural and educational partnerships funded by the Chinese government that have faced increasing scrutiny in the U.S. over concerns regarding academic freedom and foreign influence. context
Who It Would Affect
Groups the bill's text would affect if enacted, as described in the record. Being affected is not a position for or against it.
Institutions of higher education
Colleges and universities must choose between maintaining specific international partnerships or remaining eligible for Department of Homeland Security funding.
Department of Homeland Security
The agency is tasked with enforcing funding restrictions and submitting reports to Congress regarding institutional relationships.
Key Facts
You don't have to trust us. Each fact below is taken straight from the official document - click any one to see the exact passage, highlighted in the original.
Frequently Asked Questions
What happens if a college has a partnership with a Confucius Institute?
Can a college get its funding back if it cuts ties with these entities?
What else do you want to know?
News Coverage
Follow the record
Votes, people, money & the original sourceWhere This Stands
Currently passed chamber. The next step in the legislative lifecycle is Law.
Procedural history
20 actions- May 8, 2025SenateCommitteeReceived in the Senate and Read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs.
- May 7, 2025HouseMotion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.
- May 7, 2025HouseFloorOn passage Passed by the Yeas and Nays: 266 - 153 (Roll no. 120). (text of amendment in the nature of a substitute: CR H1891)
- May 7, 2025HouseFloorPassed/agreed to in House: On passage Passed by the Yeas and Nays: 266 - 153 (Roll no. 120). (text of amendment in the nature of a substitute: CR H1891)
- May 7, 2025HouseConsidered as unfinished business. (consideration: CR H1895-1896)
- May 7, 2025HousePOSTPONED PROCEEDINGS - At the conclusion of debate of H.R. 881, the Chair put the question on passage of the bill and by voice vote announced that the ayes had prevailed. Mr. Pfluger demanded the yeas and nays and the Chair postponed further proceedings until a time to be announced.
Show 14 earlier actions
- May 7, 2025HouseThe previous question was ordered pursuant to the rule.
- May 7, 2025HouseDEBATE - The House proceeded with one hour of debate on H.R. 881.
- May 7, 2025HouseRule provides for consideration of H.R. 276 and H.R. 881. The resolution provides for consideration of H.R. 276 and H.R. 881 under a closed rule with one hour of debate and one motion to recommit on each bill.
- May 7, 2025HouseConsidered under the provisions of rule H. Res. 377. (consideration: CR H1891-1894)
- May 6, 2025HouseRule H. Res. 377 passed House.
- May 5, 2025HouseRules Committee Resolution H. Res. 377 Reported to House. Rule provides for consideration of H.R. 276 and H.R. 881. The resolution provides for consideration of H.R. 276 and H.R. 881 under a closed rule with one hour of debate and one motion to recommit on each bill.
- May 5, 2025HousePlaced on the Union Calendar, Calendar No. 62.
- May 5, 2025HouseReported (Amended) by the Committee on Homeland Security. H. Rept. 119-87.
- Apr 9, 2025HouseCommitteeOrdered to be Reported in the Nature of a Substitute (Amended).
- Apr 9, 2025HouseCommittee Consideration and Mark-up Session Held
- Apr 9, 2025HouseSubcommittee on Counterterrorism and Intelligence Discharged
- Jan 31, 2025HouseCommitteeReferred to the Subcommittee on Counterterrorism and Intelligence.
- Jan 31, 2025HouseCommitteeReferred to the House Committee on Homeland Security.
- Jan 31, 2025HouseIntroducedIntroduced in House
Version history
Only one version on file - nothing to compare yet. As later stages (committee substitute, engrossed, enrolled) are captured, the redline appears here.
View official text →Voting Record
Total
419
- Yes
- 266
- No
- 153
- Present
- 0
- Not voting
- 0
- Abstain
- 0
How they voted (419)
395 more members
Full breakdown
Who this bill affects and the strongest case for and against it, written only from the bill’s own text.
Sponsors
Discoveries
Patterns POLISCOPE noticed across the record. These are observations to investigate, not conclusions.
Academic Funding Decoupling
The bill represents a move to use federal agency funding as a lever to force the termination of specific international academic partnerships.
Connected Entities
Sources
www.congress.gov
Analysis Score
0–100- Significance85How much this matters to a regular citizen
- Controversy75Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
- Entertainment10Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
- Buzz40Current news / social attention level
Publisher tools
