Proposed Restrictions on DHS Funding for Colleges Linked to Confucius Institutes
January 31, 2025
Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.
Where This Stands
Currently in_committee. The next step in the legislative lifecycle is Floor Vote.
Version history
Only one version on file - nothing to compare yet. As later stages (committee substitute, engrossed, enrolled) are captured, the redline appears here.
View official text →The Frame
If enacted, this bill would force colleges to choose between maintaining partnerships with specific Chinese-funded entities and receiving federal research or security grants from the Department of Homeland Security starting 12 months after the law's passage.
Potentially affected actors named in the source documents. Mention is not a position.
Institutions of higher education
Colleges and universities must choose between maintaining specific international partnerships or remaining eligible for Department of Homeland Security funding.
Department of Homeland Security
The agency is tasked with enforcing funding restrictions and submitting reports to Congress regarding institutional relationships.
Current stage: in_committee.
Floor Vote.
Background
- Confucius Institutes are cultural and educational partnerships funded by the Chinese government that have faced increasing scrutiny in the U.S. over concerns regarding academic freedom and foreign influence. context
Summary
Key Facts
You don't have to trust us. Each fact below is taken straight from the official document - click any one to see the exact passage, highlighted in the original.
Frequently Asked Questions
What happens if a college has a partnership with a Confucius Institute?
Can a college get its funding back if it cuts ties with these entities?
Why It Matters
If enacted, this bill would force colleges to choose between maintaining partnerships with specific Chinese-funded entities and receiving federal research or security grants from the Department of Homeland Security starting 12 months after the law's passage.
News Coverage
Voting Record
Total
419
Yes
266
No
153
Present
0
Not Voting
0
Abstain
0
How they voted (419)
Jimmy Patronis
R · yes
Harold Rogers
R · yes
Hillary Scholten
D · yes
Sheri Biggs
R · yes
Wesley Hunt
R · yes
Ron Estes
R · yes
Barry Moore
R · yes
Shomari Figures
D · yes
Ritchie Torres
D · no
Christopher Deluzio
D · yes
Johnny Olszewski
D · no
Abraham Hamadeh
R · yes
Michelle Fischbach
R · yes
Nick LaLota
R · yes
Raja Krishnamoorthi
D · no
Eric Sorensen
D · yes
Brittany Pettersen
D · no
Frank Mrvan
D · yes
Thomas Suozzi
D · yes
Doug LaMalfa
R · yes
Guy Reschenthaler
R · yes
Deborah Ross
D · no
Sheila Cherfilus-McCormick
D · no
Mike Ezell
R · yes
+ 395 more
Sponsors
Discoveries
Patterns POLISCOPE noticed across the record. These are observations to investigate, not conclusions.
Academic Funding Decoupling
The bill represents a move to use federal agency funding as a lever to force the termination of specific international academic partnerships.
Connected Entities
Sources
www.congress.gov
Analysis Score
0–100- Significance85How much this matters to a regular citizen
- Controversy75Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
- Entertainment10Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
- Buzz40Current news / social attention level
Publisher tools