POLISCOPE
Back to bills

The civic record

Read. Follow. Verify.
Passed

Pennsylvania House Bill 986 Prohibits Unfair Real Estate Service Agreements and Establishes Civil and Criminal Penalties

Original title: An Act providing for transparency in realty agreements; prohibiting unfair real estate service agreements; and imposing penalties.

Last action · May 13, 2025: Referred to URBAN AFFAIRS AND HOUSING, May 12, 2025Sponsors: Morgan Cephas and 11 others

Introduced
Committee
Floor Vote
Passed
Law

Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.

Public stanceCommunity reactions are separate from the official record and reporting.

What This Bill Would Do

House Bill 986 declares certain long-term or binding real estate service agreements void and unenforceable, prohibits recording them in public land records, and sets civil damages and third-degree misdemeanor penalties for violations, taking effect in 60 days.

Why it matters

Homeowners targeted by misleading real estate service contracts gain the right to sue providers for actual damages or statutory minimums of $5,000 (and $15,000 for seniors 60 and older) without being required to repay any money received from the provider.

Background
  • House Bill 986 was introduced in the Pennsylvania House of Representatives during the 2025-2026 legislative session. context
  • The Unfair Trade Practices and Consumer Protection Law serves as Pennsylvania's primary consumer protection statute prohibiting deceptive business practices. context

Who It Would Affect

Groups the bill's text would affect if enacted, as described in the record. Being affected is not a position for or against it.

Directly affected

Consumers

Consumers gain the right to void unfair real estate service agreements, sue providers for statutory or actual damages, and retain any money previously paid by the provider.

Directly affected

Real estate service providers

Real estate service providers are prohibited from executing or recording unfair service agreements and face civil liability and misdemeanor charges for violations.

Directly affected

Property owners 60 years of age or older

Older property owners are eligible for higher statutory minimum damages of $15,000 in civil actions against violating service providers.

Key Facts

You don't have to trust us. Each fact below is taken straight from the official document - click any one to see the exact passage, highlighted in the original.

Frequently Asked Questions

What makes a real estate service agreement unfair under this bill?
A real estate service agreement is unfair if it claims to or bind future owners, creates a lien or encumbrance on the property, or allows assignment without timely notice to the property owner.
What are the financial penalties for a real estate provider who uses these agreements?
Providers face actual damages or $5,000 (whichever is greater), rising to $15,000 for consumers aged 60 or older, plus reasonable attorney fees and litigation costs.
Is recording an unfair real estate service agreement a crime?
Yes, a person who records or causes to be recorded an unfair real estate service agreement is guilty of a .

What else do you want to know?

News Coverage

No news coverage found yet. Articles are indexed twice daily.

Where This Stands

Currently passed chamber. The next step in the legislative lifecycle is Law.

Procedural history

11 actions
  1. May 13, 2025SenateCommittee
    Referred to URBAN AFFAIRS AND HOUSING, May 12, 2025
  2. May 13, 2025Senate
    In the Senate
  3. May 7, 2025HouseFloor
    Third consideration and final passage, May 7, 2025 (153-50)
  4. May 7, 2025HouseCommittee
    Re-reported as committed, May 7, 2025
  5. May 6, 2025House
    Re-committed to APPROPRIATIONS, May 6, 2025
  6. May 6, 2025HouseFloor
    Second consideration, May 6, 2025
Show 5 earlier actions
  1. May 5, 2025House
    Removed from table, May 5, 2025
  2. Apr 8, 2025House
    Laid on the table, April 8, 2025
  3. Apr 8, 2025HouseIntroduced
    First consideration, April 8, 2025
  4. Apr 8, 2025HouseCommittee
    Reported as committed, April 8, 2025
  5. Mar 20, 2025HouseCommittee
    Referred to HOUSING AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT, March 20, 2025

Version history

Only one version on file - nothing to compare yet. As later stages (committee substitute, engrossed, enrolled) are captured, the redline appears here.

View official text →

Lobbying Activity

No state lobbying filings in our records match this bill. Federal lobbying reports (LDA) cover Congress, so they are not listed on state bills.

Full breakdown

Who this bill affects and the strongest case for and against it, written only from the bill’s own text.

Sponsors

Discoveries

1 pattern noticed across the record

Patterns POLISCOPE noticed across the record. These are observations to investigate, not conclusions.

policy shift98% confidence

Introduction of Specific Statutory Damages for Seniors

The bill scales statutory damages upward for property owners aged 60 or older, setting a distinct protection tier of $15,000 compared to the baseline $5,000 amount.

Connected Entities

Unfair Trade Practices and Consumer Protection Law, Real Estate Licensing and Registration Act, General Assembly of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania
otherUnfair Trade Practices and Consumer Protection Law“Law governing deceptive acts and unfair methods of competition”Map →
otherReal Estate Licensing and Registration Act“Act defining real estate service”Map →
OrganizationGeneral Assembly of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania“Legislative body enacting the act”Map →

Sources

Open source document

www.palegis.us

Analysis Score

0–100
  • Significance75
    How much this matters to a regular citizen
  • Controversy20
    Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
  • Entertainment5
    Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
  • Buzz35
    Current news / social attention level

Publisher tools

Share or embed this record

POLISCOPE publisher tools

Share or embed this record