POLISCOPE
Back to bills

The civic record

Read. Follow. Verify.
Did Not Advance

Texas HB 1346 raises criminal penalties for dangerous dog attacks causing bodily injury and adds witness confidentiality

Original title: Relating to an attack by a dangerous dog; increasing a criminal penalty.

Last action · March 10, 2025: Referred to Public HealthSponsors: Liz Campos and 4 others

Companion · SB 155same policy, Senate version
Introduced
Committee
Floor Vote
Passed
Law

Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.

Public stanceCommunity reactions are separate from the official record and reporting.

What This Bill Proposed

Dog owners whose unrestrained or known dangerous dogs make unprovoked attacks resulting in now face increased criminal penalties ranging from a to a felony of the third degree, effective September 1, 2025. The bill also establishes witness identity confidentiality in dangerous dog determinations and mandates animal control investigations in specific large municipalities.

Why it matters

Dog owners face harsher criminal charges and potential felony records for unprovoked attacks by their pets, while witnesses to dangerous dog incidents receive legal confidentiality regarding their identifying information.

Background
  • Texas law regulates dangerous dogs under Chapter 822 of the Health and Safety Code, specifying requirements for secure enclosures, registration, and criminal liability for owners when attacks occur. context

Who It Would Have Affected

Groups the bill's text would have affected, as described in the record. Being affected is not a position for or against it.

Directly affected

Dog owners

Dog owners face increased criminal penalties, including potential felony charges, for unprovoked attacks caused by criminal negligence or failure to secure a dangerous dog.

Directly affected

Witnesses to dog attacks

Witnesses who provide sworn statements regarding dangerous dogs have their identifying information made confidential and protected from public disclosure.

Directly affected

Animal control authorities in large municipalities

Animal control authorities in qualifying large municipalities are required to investigate reported dog incidents and issue written determinations.

Key Facts

You don't have to trust us. Each fact below is taken straight from the official document - click any one to see the exact passage, highlighted in the original.

Frequently Asked Questions

What happens if a dog causes bodily injury due to an owner's criminal negligence?
The owner commits a if the attack causes , a third-degree felony if it causes , or a second-degree felony if it causes death.
Is witness information kept private when reporting a dangerous dog?
Yes, the identifying information of a witness who gives a sworn statement is confidential and not subject to public disclosure under Chapter 552, Government Code, though it can be shared with applicable governing bodies and law enforcement.
What is the penalty for repeat violations of failing to secure a dangerous dog?
It is increased from a Class C misdemeanor to a Class A misdemeanor if the defendant has been previously convicted under Section 822.044.

What else do you want to know?

News Coverage

No news coverage found yet. Articles are indexed twice daily.

Where This Stands

This bill did not become law - Died at adjournment · in House committee.

Procedural history

3 actions
  1. Mar 10, 2025HouseCommittee
    Referred to Public Health
  2. Mar 10, 2025HouseIntroduced
    Read first time
  3. Nov 15, 2024HouseIntroduced
    Filed

Version history

Only one version on file - nothing to compare yet. As later stages (committee substitute, engrossed, enrolled) are captured, the redline appears here.

View official text →

Lobbying Activity

No state lobbying filings in our records match this bill. Federal lobbying reports (LDA) cover Congress, so they are not listed on state bills.

Full breakdown

Who this bill affects and the strongest case for and against it, written only from the bill’s own text.

Sponsors

Discoveries

1 pattern noticed across the record

Patterns POLISCOPE noticed across the record. These are observations to investigate, not conclusions.

policy shift95% confidence

Escalation of Criminal Penalties for Pet Owners

The bill links failure to secure dangerous animals directly to felony tiers based on injury severity, reflecting a tightening of owner accountability.

Connected Entities

Government Code, Penal Code, Health and Safety Code
OrganizationGovernment Code“Reference for chapter 552 regarding public information disclosure”Map →
OrganizationPenal Code“Reference for definitions such as bodily injury, criminal negligence, and identi”Map →
OrganizationHealth and Safety Code“Statutory code amended by the bill”Map →

Sources

Open source document

capitol.texas.gov

Analysis Score

0–100
  • Significance20
    Lowered because this bill did not pass (its text scored 75)
  • Controversy25
    Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
  • Entertainment10
    Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
  • Buzz30
    Current news / social attention level

Publisher tools

Share or embed this record

POLISCOPE publisher tools

Share or embed this record