POLISCOPE
Back to bills

The civic record

Read. Follow. Verify.
Enacted

Utah updates evidence retention and biological evidence preservation rules for law enforcement agencies

Original title: Evidence Retention Amendments

Last action · March 23, 2026: Governor SignedSponsors: Wayne Harper and 1 other

Introduced
Committee
Floor Vote
Passed
Law

Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.

Public stanceCommunity reactions are separate from the official record and reporting.

What This Bill Does

This bill modifies requirements for law enforcement agencies seeking to return or dispose of evidence in misdemeanor and felony cases, establishes mandatory retention periods for felony and violent felony evidence including sexual assault kits, and sets out formal notice and objection procedures for defendants and prosecutors.

Why it matters

Law enforcement agencies, prosecutors, defense attorneys, and individuals convicted of crimes face new procedural rules, timelines, and notice requirements before physical and can be returned or destroyed.

Who It Affects

Groups the bill's text affects, as described in the record. Being affected is not a position for or against it.

Directly affected

Law Enforcement Agencies

Law enforcement agencies must follow updated request procedures, timelines, and court petition processes when seeking to return or dispose of misdemeanor and felony evidence.

Directly affected

Prosecuting Attorneys

Prosecuting attorneys are required to review evidence disposal requests, issue notices of receipt and decisions within specific timeframes, and handle objections.

Directly affected

Defendants and Inmates

Individuals in custody or facing prosecution receive formal notices regarding evidence disposal and gain structured windows to submit objections or request DNA testing.

Key Facts

You don't have to trust us. Each fact below is taken straight from the official document - click any one to see the exact passage, highlighted in the original.

Frequently Asked Questions

What must a law enforcement agency do before disposing of misdemeanor evidence?
The agency must send a written request to the prosecuting attorney explaining why the evidence is no longer required and detailing steps taken to preserve sufficient evidence for prosecution.
How long must biological evidence from a sexual assault kit be preserved?
Sexual assault kit contents must generally be preserved for 20 years from the day the evidence is collected, subject to other specific custody and post-conviction retention timelines.
Can a defendant object to the disposal of biological evidence?
Yes, notified individuals may file a motion for DNA testing or submit a written request for retention within 180 days of receiving notice of intent to dispose.

What else do you want to know?

News Coverage

No news coverage found yet. Articles are indexed twice daily.

Where This Stands

Current status: Signed into law.

Procedural history

39 actions
  1. Mar 23, 2026Lieutenant Governor's office for filingEnrolled
    Governor Signed
  2. Mar 11, 2026Senate
    Senate/ to Governor
  3. Mar 11, 2026Senate
    Senate/ received enrolled bill from Printing
  4. Mar 3, 2026Senate
    Senate/ enrolled bill to Printing
  5. Mar 3, 2026Senate Secretary
    Enrolled Bill Returned to House or Senate
  6. Mar 2, 2026Legislative Research and General Counsel / Enrolling
    Draft of Enrolled Bill Prepared
Show 33 earlier actions
  1. Mar 2, 2026Legislative Research and General Counsel / Enrolling
    Bill Received from Senate for Enrolling
  2. Feb 26, 2026Senate
    Senate/ signed by President/ sent for enrolling
  3. Feb 26, 2026Senate
    Senate/ received from House
  4. Feb 26, 2026House
    House/ to Senate
  5. Feb 26, 2026House
    House/ signed by Speaker/ returned to Senate
  6. Feb 26, 2026HouseFloor
    House/ passed 3rd reading
  7. Feb 26, 2026House
    House/ 3rd reading
  8. Feb 25, 2026House
    House/ 2nd reading
  9. Feb 25, 2026House
    House/ committee report favorable
  10. Feb 25, 2026House
    House Comm - Favorable Recommendation
  11. Feb 19, 2026HouseCommittee
    House/ to standing committee
  12. Feb 18, 2026HouseIntroduced
    House/ 1st reading (Introduced)
  13. Feb 17, 2026House
    House/ received from Senate
  14. Feb 17, 2026Senate
    Senate/ to House
  15. Feb 17, 2026SenateFloor
    Senate/ passed 3rd reading
  16. Feb 17, 2026Senate
    Senate/ uncircled
  17. Feb 17, 2026Senate
    Senate/ circled
  18. Feb 17, 2026Senate
    Senate/ 3rd reading
  19. Feb 13, 2026SenateFloor
    Senate/ passed 2nd reading
  20. Feb 13, 2026Senate
    Senate/ 2nd reading
  21. Jan 29, 2026Senate
    Senate/ placed on 2nd Reading Calendar
  22. Jan 29, 2026Senate
    Senate/ committee report favorable
  23. Jan 27, 2026Senate
    Senate Comm - Favorable Recommendation
  24. Jan 20, 2026SenateCommittee
    Senate/ to standing committee
  25. Jan 20, 2026SenateIntroduced
    Senate/ 1st reading (Introduced)
  26. Jan 16, 2026Senate
    Senate/ received fiscal note from Fiscal Analyst
  27. Jan 15, 2026Released
    LFA/ fiscal note publicly available for SB0071
  28. Jan 15, 2026Version Sponsor
    LFA/ fiscal note sent to sponsor for SB0071
  29. Jan 7, 2026Senate
    Senate/ received bill from Legislative Research
  30. Jan 5, 2026Legislative Fiscal Agency
    LFA/ bill sent to agencies for fiscal input for SB0071
  31. Jan 5, 2026Legislative Fiscal Analyst
    LFA/ bill assigned to staff for fiscal analysis for SB0071
  32. Jan 5, 2026Legislative Research and General Counsel
    Numbered Bill Publicly Distributed
  33. Jan 5, 2026Legislative Research and General Counsel
    Bill Numbered but not Distributed

Version history

Only one version on file - nothing to compare yet. As later stages (committee substitute, engrossed, enrolled) are captured, the redline appears here.

View official text →

Lobbying Activity

No state lobbying filings in our records match this bill. Federal lobbying reports (LDA) cover Congress, so they are not listed on state bills.

Full breakdown

Who this bill affects and the strongest case for and against it, written only from the bill’s own text.

Sponsors

Discoveries

1 pattern noticed across the record

Patterns POLISCOPE noticed across the record. These are observations to investigate, not conclusions.

policy shift95% confidence

Standardized Evidence Disposal and Review Timelines

The legislation formalizes strict notification and response deadlines between law enforcement agencies, prosecutors, and defendants before physical or biological evidence can be returned or destroyed.

Connected Entities

Ken Ivory, Utah, Wayne A. Harper
PersonKen Ivory“House Sponsor, Representative”Map →
locationUtah“Jurisdiction of the legislative session”Map →
PersonWayne A. Harper“Chief Sponsor, Senator”Map →

Sources

Analysis Score

0–100
  • Significance75
    How much this matters to a regular citizen
  • Controversy15
    Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
  • Entertainment5
    Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
  • Buzz25
    Current news / social attention level

Publisher tools

Share or embed this record

POLISCOPE publisher tools

Share or embed this record