POLISCOPE
Back to bills

The civic record

Read. Follow. Verify.
Did Not Advance

Connecticut extends portal-to-portal workers' compensation coverage to public works employees under specific conditions

Original title: AN ACT CONCERNING PORTAL-TO-PORTAL WORKERS' COMPENSATION COVERAGE FOR PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT EMPLOYEES.

Last action · April 2, 2026: File Number 352Sponsors: Nicholas Menapace and 4 others

Introduced
Committee
Floor Vote
Passed
Law

Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.

What This Bill Proposed

This bill extends portal-to-portal workers' compensation coverage to state and municipal public works department employees when commuting under emergency call-in terms, direct orders during non-essential closures, or following consecutive mandatory overtime shifts, effective October 1, 2026.

Why it matters

Expands financial and medical protection for state and municipal public works personnel injured while commuting under specific emergency or high-demand conditions, creating potential costs for state agencies and self-insured municipalities.

Background
  • Portal-to-portal workers' compensation coverage in Connecticut previously applied to police officers, firefighters, telecommunicators, and Department of Correction employees under specific conditions, but excluded public works personnel. context
  • The Labor and Public Employees Committee reported the bill favorably on March 17, 2026, with a 9-4 vote. context

Who It Would Have Affected

Groups the bill's text would have affected, as described in the record. Being affected is not a position for or against it.

Directly affected

Public works department employees

Eligible for workers' compensation benefits for injuries sustained during commutes under specific emergency, closure, or overtime conditions.

Directly affected

Department of Administrative Services

Faces potential cost impacts for state-level workers' compensation claims beginning in fiscal year 27.

Directly affected

Various Municipalities

Self-insured municipalities face potential cost increases due to the state mandate expanding workers' compensation liabilities.

Key Facts

You don't have to trust us. Each fact below is taken straight from the official document - click any one to see the exact passage, highlighted in the original.

Frequently Asked Questions

Who is covered by the new portal-to-portal workers' compensation provision?
Employees of a state or municipal public works department are covered under specific conditions such as emergency call-ins, direct orders during closures, or consecutive mandatory overtime shifts.
What does portal-to-portal coverage mean for employees?
It means an injury that occurs while an employee is traveling directly between their home and workplace is deemed to have occurred in the course of their employment, making them eligible for workers' compensation benefits.

What else do you want to know?

News Coverage

No news coverage found yet. Articles are indexed twice daily.

Where This Stands

This bill did not become law - Died at adjournment · on the Senate floor.

Procedural history

9 actions
  1. Apr 2, 2026Connecticut General Assembly
    File Number 352
  2. Apr 2, 2026Senate
    Senate Calendar Number 238
  3. Apr 2, 2026Senate
    Favorable Report, Tabled for the Calendar, Senate
  4. Apr 2, 2026Connecticut General Assembly
    Reported Out of Legislative Commissioners' Office
  5. Mar 27, 2026Connecticut General Assembly
    Referred to Office of Legislative Research and Office of Fiscal Analysis 04/01/26 5:00 PM
  6. Mar 18, 2026Connecticut General Assembly
    Filed with Legislative Commissioners' Office
Show 3 earlier actions
  1. Mar 17, 2026Connecticut General Assembly
    Joint Favorable
  2. Feb 27, 2026Connecticut General Assembly
    Public Hearing 03/03
  3. Feb 26, 2026Connecticut General AssemblyCommittee
    Referred to Joint Committee on Labor and Public Employees

Version history

Only one version on file - nothing to compare yet. As later stages (committee substitute, engrossed, enrolled) are captured, the redline appears here.

View official text →

Lobbying Activity

No state lobbying filings in our records match this bill. Federal lobbying reports (LDA) cover Congress, so they are not listed on state bills.

Full breakdown

Who this bill affects and the strongest case for and against it, written only from the bill’s own text.

Sponsors

Discoveries

1 pattern noticed across the record

Patterns POLISCOPE noticed across the record. These are observations to investigate, not conclusions.

cross reference100% confidence

Identical Companion Measure

The OLR bill analysis notes that sHB 5003, section 8, reported favorably by the same committee, is identical to this bill.

Connected Entities

Sarah Keitt, Workers' Compensation Commission, James Sanchez and 11 more
PersonSarah Keitt“Representative, 134th District, cosponsor”Map →
OrganizationWorkers' Compensation Commission“Adopts regulations to implement the section”Map →
PersonJames Sanchez“Representative, 6th District, cosponsor”Map →
PersonTreasurer“May require vouchers and information for Second Injury Fund reimbursements”Map →
PersonNicholas Menapace“Representative, 37th District, cosponsor”Map →
OrganizationDepartment of Correction“State agency with existing portal-to-portal coverage rules”Map →
OrganizationDepartment of Administrative Services“Affected state agency handling workers' compensation claims”Map →
OrganizationGeneral Assembly“Legislative body passing the bill”Map →
OrganizationLabor and Public Employees Committee“Committee reporting the bill”Map →
PersonKara Rochelle“Representative, 104th District, cosponsor”Map →
PersonSen. Kushner“Chairperson of the Labor and Public Employees Committee”Map →
PersonHerron Gaston“Senator, 23rd District, cosponsor”Map →
PersonCommissioner of Consumer Protection“Designates controlled substances”Map →
OrganizationSecond Injury Fund“Fund providing reimbursement for certain death benefits”Map →

Sources

Analysis Score

0–100
  • Significance20
    Lowered because this bill did not pass (its text scored 60)
  • Controversy35
    Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
  • Entertainment5
    Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
  • Buzz25
    Current news / social attention level

Publisher tools

Share or embed this record

POLISCOPE publisher tools

Share or embed this record