POLISCOPE
Back to bills

The civic record

Read. Follow. Verify.
Did Not Advance

Connecticut requires private equity real estate investors to wait 90 days before buying residential homes

Original title: AN ACT CONCERNING THE PURCHASE OF RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY BY PRIVATE EQUITY ENTITIES.

Last action · May 1, 2026: House Calendar Number 548Sponsors: Saud Anwar and 8 others

Introduced
Committee
Floor Vote
Passed
Law

Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.

Public stanceCommunity reactions are separate from the official record and reporting.

What This Bill Proposed

Private equity entities and s are prohibited from purchasing or offering to buy any single- or two-family home unless the property has been listed for sale to the general public for at least 90 days, effective October 1, 2026. The waiting period resets if the seller changes the asking price, and violators face civil penalties of up to $250,000 brought by the Attorney General.

Why it matters

Changes the purchasing timeline and compliance obligations for large real estate investment firms acquiring residential property, creating potential civil penalties of up to $250,000 per violation.

Background
  • The bill was modified during committee review to increase the asset threshold for institutional real estate investors from $30 million to $50 million. context
  • Federal executive actions and proposed congressional measures have similarly targeted large institutional acquisitions of single-family housing. context

Who It Would Have Affected

Groups the bill's text would have affected, as described in the record. Being affected is not a position for or against it.

Directly affected

Private equity entities

Must wait 90 days before purchasing publicly listed residential properties, provide signed disclosure notices, and face potential civil penalties up to $250,000 for non-compliance.

Directly affected

Institutional real estate investors

Subject to asset and portfolio ownership definitions that classify them under the purchasing restrictions.

Directly affected

Residential home sellers

Must navigate the 90-day public listing waiting period and receive signed compliance notices from private equity buyers before finalizing transactions.

Key Facts

  • Private equity entities are prohibited from purchasing or offering to acquire any single- or two-family residence unless it has been listed for sale to the general public for at least 90 days.
  • The 90-day waiting period restarts if the seller changes the asking price for the residence.
  • Private equity entities must submit a signed written notice of compliance to the seller or seller's agent prior to finalizing a purchase.
  • An 'institutional real estate investor' is defined as an entity or group that owns 10 or more single- or two-family residences, manages pooled investor funds as a fiduciary, and has $50 million or more in net value or assets.
Show all 8 facts
  • Exemptions from the definition of a private equity entity include 501(c)(3) nonprofit organizations and entities operating under the state housing land bank and land trust program.
  • Residences intended as the principal residence of a person with an ownership interest in the purchasing entity, or homes built with federal, state, or municipal funds, are exempt from the waiting period.
  • Violators of the provisions may be subject to civil damages and penalties of up to $250,000.
  • The Attorney General is authorized to bring civil actions on behalf of the state seeking injunctive relief, declaratory relief, and civil penalties.

Frequently Asked Questions

What triggers the 90-day waiting period to restart?
The 90-day waiting period restarts if the seller changes the asking price for the single-family or two-family residence.
Are all investment companies covered under the private equity entity definition?
No. The definition excludes 501(c)(3) nonprofit organizations, housing land trust programs, and residences built or acquired using government-appropriated funds, as well as properties meant to be the principal residence of an owner of the purchasing entity.

What else do you want to know?

News Coverage

No news coverage found yet. Articles are indexed twice daily.

Where This Stands

This bill did not become law - Died at adjournment · passed the Senate · on the House floor.

Procedural history

22 actions
  1. May 1, 2026House
    House Calendar Number 548
  2. May 1, 2026House
    Favorable Report, Tabled for the Calendar, House
  3. Apr 30, 2026House
    Rules Suspended, Transmitted to the House
  4. Apr 30, 2026SenateFloor
    Senate Passed as Amended by Senate Amendment Schedule A
  5. Apr 30, 2026SenateFloor
    Senate Adopted Senate Amendment Schedule A 5442
  6. Apr 21, 2026Connecticut General Assembly
    File Number 706
Show 16 earlier actions
  1. Apr 21, 2026Senate
    Favorable Report, Tabled for the Calendar, Senate
  2. Apr 21, 2026Connecticut General Assembly
    New File by Committee on Appropriations
  3. Apr 21, 2026Connecticut General Assembly
    Reported Out of Legislative Commissioners' Office
  4. Apr 14, 2026Connecticut General Assembly
    Referred to Office of Legislative Research and Office of Fiscal Analysis 04/20/26 5:00 PM
  5. Apr 10, 2026Connecticut General Assembly
    Filed with Legislative Commissioners' Office
  6. Apr 10, 2026Connecticut General Assembly
    Joint Favorable Substitute
  7. Apr 8, 2026Connecticut General Assembly
    Immediate Transmittal to Committee on Judiciary
  8. Mar 26, 2026Connecticut General Assembly
    File Number 203
  9. Mar 26, 2026Senate
    Senate Calendar Number 124
  10. Mar 26, 2026Senate
    Favorable Report, Tabled for the Calendar, Senate
  11. Mar 26, 2026Connecticut General Assembly
    Reported Out of Legislative Commissioners' Office
  12. Mar 20, 2026Connecticut General Assembly
    Referred to Office of Legislative Research and Office of Fiscal Analysis 03/25/26 5:00 PM
  13. Mar 11, 2026Connecticut General Assembly
    Filed with Legislative Commissioners' Office
  14. Mar 10, 2026Connecticut General Assembly
    Joint Favorable Substitute
  15. Feb 20, 2026Connecticut General Assembly
    Public Hearing 02/24
  16. Feb 19, 2026Connecticut General AssemblyCommittee
    Referred to Joint Committee on Housing

Version history

Only one version on file - nothing to compare yet. As later stages (committee substitute, engrossed, enrolled) are captured, the redline appears here.

View official text →

Lobbying Activity

No state lobbying filings in our records match this bill. Federal lobbying reports (LDA) cover Congress, so they are not listed on state bills.

Full breakdown

Who this bill affects and the strongest case for and against it, written only from the bill’s own text.

Sponsors

Discoveries

1 pattern noticed across the record

Patterns POLISCOPE noticed across the record. These are observations to investigate, not conclusions.

policy shift95% confidence

State-Level Institutional Investor Regulation

The bill introduces specific civil penalties up to $250,000 enforceable by the Attorney General to curb large-scale institutional purchasing of single- and two-family homes.

Connected Entities

Sen. Martin M. Looney, Housing Committee, Office of the Attorney General and 9 more
PersonSen. Martin M. Looney“Cosponsor of the bill from the 11th District.”Map →
OrganizationHousing Committee“Committee that introduced the bill.”Map →
OrganizationOffice of the Attorney General“Authorized to bring civil actions and seek penalties against violators.”Map →
OrganizationInternal Revenue Code“Referenced regarding tax-exempt 501(c)(3) organization definitions.”Map →
PersonRep. Tom Delnicki“Cosponsor of the bill from the 14th District.”Map →
PersonRep. Josh Elliott“Cosponsor of the bill from the 88th District.”Map →
PersonSen. Gary A. Winfield“Cosponsor of the bill and Chairperson of the Judiciary Committee from the 10th D”Map →
PersonSen. Patricia Billie Miller“Cosponsor of the bill from the 27th District.”Map →
PersonRep. Antonio Felipe“Cosponsor of the bill from the 130th District.”Map →
PersonSen. Ceci Maher“Cosponsor of the bill from the 26th District.”Map →
PersonRep. Nick Gauthier“Cosponsor of the bill from the 38th District.”Map →
PersonSen. Saud Anwar“Cosponsor of the bill from the 3rd District.”Map →

Sources

Analysis Score

0–100
  • Significance20
    Lowered because this bill did not pass (its text scored 75)
  • Controversy65
    Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
  • Entertainment10
    Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
  • Buzz50
    Current news / social attention level

Publisher tools

Share or embed this record

POLISCOPE publisher tools

Share or embed this record