POLISCOPE
Back to bills

The civic record

Read. Follow. Verify.
High Impact

Missouri House Bill 2428 revises charter school sponsorship, funding, and property use rules

Original title: CHARTER SCHOOLS

Last action · May 15, 2026: Referred: Emerging Issues(H)Sponsor: Ben Keathley

Introduced
Committee
Floor Vote
Passed
Law

Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.

What This Bill Would Do

House Bill 2428 updates laws governing charter schools in Missouri by altering sponsorship eligibility, mandating nonprofit status for management companies, and prohibiting local restrictions on charter school property use in any city not within a county. The legislation establishes requirements for governing board members, financial disclosures, and the operational duties of school sponsors. It applies to charter schools, school districts, sponsors, and educational management organizations across the state.

Why it matters

The measure alters how charter schools are sponsored, funded, and established, changing governance standards, background check requirements for board members, and real estate access rules for charter operators across Missouri school districts.

Who It Would Affect

Groups the bill's text would affect if enacted, as described in the record. Being affected is not a position for or against it.

Directly affected

Charter schools

Charter schools are subject to revised governance standards, financial reporting rules, background check mandates, and statutory provisions governing their operation and funding.

Directly affected

School districts

School districts face updated requirements regarding state school aid calculations, pupil reporting, disbursal agent duties, and lease agreements with charter schools.

Directly affected

Charter school sponsors

Sponsors must adhere to revised application review procedures, oversight duties, compliance reporting, and fee prohibitions.

Directly affected

Charter school management companies

Management companies must incorporate as nonprofit corporations under chapter 355, and their employees are subject to the same laws and regulations as school employees when conducting direct decision-making work.

Key Facts

You don't have to trust us. Each fact below is taken straight from the official document - click any one to see the exact passage, highlighted in the original.

Frequently Asked Questions

What restrictions does the bill place on local municipalities regarding charter school properties?
The bill prohibits any city not within a county from enacting ordinances, policies, or deed restrictions that prevent city-owned or transferred property from being used for lawful educational purposes by a charter school.
Are charter school sponsors allowed to charge application fees?
No sponsor may receive any fee of any type from an applicant for considering a charter, nor condition its consideration on the promise of future payment.
What organizational structure must charter school management companies adopt?
Any charter school management company operating a charter school in the state must be a nonprofit corporation incorporated pursuant to chapter 355.

What else do you want to know?

News Coverage

No news coverage found yet. Articles are indexed twice daily.

Where This Stands

Currently in committee. The next step in the legislative lifecycle is Floor Vote.

Procedural history

4 actions
  1. May 15, 2026HouseCommittee
    Referred: Emerging Issues(H)
  2. Jan 8, 2026HouseFloor
    Read Second Time (H)
  3. Jan 7, 2026HouseIntroduced
    Read First Time (H)
  4. Dec 15, 2025HouseIntroduced
    Prefiled (H)

Version history

Only one version on file - nothing to compare yet. As later stages (committee substitute, engrossed, enrolled) are captured, the redline appears here.

View official text →

Lobbying Activity

No state lobbying filings in our records match this bill. Federal lobbying reports (LDA) cover Congress, so they are not listed on state bills.

Full breakdown

Who this bill affects and the strongest case for and against it, written only from the bill’s own text.

Sponsors

Discoveries

2 patterns noticed across the record

Patterns POLISCOPE noticed across the record. These are observations to investigate, not conclusions.

policy shift98% confidence

Prohibition of Municipal Educational Restrictions

The bill establishes explicit prohibitions against cities adopting ordinances or deed restrictions that bar charter schools from using properties for educational purposes.

financial connection95% confidence

Sponsorship Funding Retention and Oversight

The Department of Elementary and Secondary Education retains 1.5% of charter school funding to distribute to sponsors meeting strict compliance criteria.

Connected Entities

Joseph Engler, Missouri Charter Public School Commission, General Assembly and 3 more
PersonJoseph Engler“Chief Clerk of the House”Map →
OrganizationMissouri Charter Public School Commission“Commission created to sponsor high-quality charter schools throughout the state”Map →
OrganizationGeneral Assembly“Legislative body of the state of Missouri”Map →
OrganizationDepartment of Elementary and Secondary Education“State department responsible for education oversight, funding distribution, and ”Map →
OrganizationMissouri School Boards Association“Association that recommends nominees for commission appointment”Map →
PersonBen Keathley“Representative for District 101, introduced HB 2428”Map →

Sources

Analysis Score

0–100
  • Significance75
    How much this matters to a regular citizen
  • Controversy60
    Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
  • Entertainment10
    Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
  • Buzz35
    Current news / social attention level

Publisher tools

Share or embed this record

POLISCOPE publisher tools

Share or embed this record