POLISCOPE
Back to bills

The civic record

Read. Follow. Verify.
Did Not Advance

Connecticut General Assembly Confirms Dismissal of Claim Against State by Estate of Patrick Camera

Original title: RESOLUTION CONFIRMING THE DECISION OF THE CLAIMS COMMISSIONER TO DISMISS THE CLAIM AGAINST THE STATE OF THE ESTATE OF PATRICK CAMERA, ADMINISTRATOR FRANK CAMERA.

Last action · March 12, 2026: Public Hearing 03/16

Introduced
Committee
Floor Vote
Passed
Law

Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.

Public stanceCommunity reactions are separate from the official record and reporting.

What This Bill Proposed

The General Assembly confirmed the decision of the to dismiss the claim against the state filed by the Estate of Patrick Camera, with Administrator Frank Camera.

Why it matters

Finalizes the legal disposition of file number 27606, preventing the Estate of Patrick Camera from pursuing financial compensation from the state through this specific claim.

Who It Would Have Affected

Groups the bill's text would have affected, as described in the record. Being affected is not a position for or against it.

Directly affected

Estate of Patrick Camera

The estate's claim against the state is officially dismissed through the legislative confirmation of the commissioner's decision.

Key Facts

You don't have to trust us. Each fact below is taken straight from the official document - click any one to see the exact passage, highlighted in the original.

Frequently Asked Questions

What does House Joint Resolution 35 do?
It formally confirms the decision of the to dismiss a claim against the state made by the Estate of Patrick Camera.
Whose claim was dismissed by this resolution?
The claim filed by the Estate of Patrick Camera, with Administrator Frank Camera.

What else do you want to know?

News Coverage

No news coverage found yet. Articles are indexed twice daily.

Where This Stands

This resolution did not become law - Died at adjournment · in House committee.

Procedural history

2 actions
  1. Mar 12, 2026Connecticut General Assembly
    Public Hearing 03/16
  2. Mar 4, 2026Connecticut General AssemblyCommittee
    Referred to Joint Committee on Judiciary

Version history

Only one version on file - nothing to compare yet. As later stages (committee substitute, engrossed, enrolled) are captured, the redline appears here.

View official text →

Lobbying Activity

No state lobbying filings in our records match this bill. Federal lobbying reports (LDA) cover Congress, so they are not listed on state bills.

Full breakdown

Who this bill affects and the strongest case for and against it, written only from the bill’s own text.

Connected Entities

Patrick Camera, Claims Commissioner, Frank Camera and 1 more
PersonPatrick Camera“Deceased individual whose estate filed a claim against the state.”Map →
OrganizationClaims Commissioner“State official who ordered the dismissal of file number 27606.”Map →
PersonFrank Camera“Administrator of the Estate of Patrick Camera.”Map →
OrganizationJudiciary Committee“Committee that introduced House Joint Resolution No. 35.”Map →

Sources

Analysis Score

0–100
  • Significance15
    Lowered because this bill did not pass (its text scored 15)
  • Controversy5
    Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
  • Entertainment2
    Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
  • Buzz5
    Current news / social attention level

Publisher tools

Share or embed this record

POLISCOPE publisher tools

Share or embed this record