The civic record
Read. Follow. Verify.Montana bill allows legislative and executive leaders to vacate court-issued writs of mandamus
Last action · May 23, 2025: (S) Died in ProcessSponsor: Barry Usher
Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.
What This Bill Proposed
Montana legislative and executive leaders would be permitted to jointly vacate a court-issued directed at elected officials or the legislature within 10 business days, prohibiting its enforcement and barring contempt findings.
Changes the legal enforcement mechanisms available to state courts when issuing orders to compel actions or document production by the legislature or executive branch officers.
Who It Would Have Affected
Groups the bill's text would have affected, as described in the record. Being affected is not a position for or against it.
elected officials listed in Article VI, section 1, of the Montana constitution
State executive officers can be protected from enforcement and contempt findings if legislative and executive leadership vacate a writ of mandamus against them.
courts
Courts that issue writs of mandamus would see their enforcement authority restricted if leadership files a pleading to vacate the writ.
the legislature as a whole or in part
Individual legislators and the legislature can have writs compelling document production or actions vacated by leadership.
Key Facts
You don't have to trust us. Each fact below is taken straight from the official document - click any one to see the exact passage, highlighted in the original.
Frequently Asked Questions
Who has the authority to sign a pleading that vacates a writ of mandamus under this bill?
What is the deadline for filing a pleading to vacate the writ?
Does a vacated writ result in contempt of court charges for the affected official?
What else do you want to know?
News Coverage
Follow the record
Votes, people, money & the original sourceWhere This Stands
This bill did not become law - Died on the Senate floor.
Procedural history
30 actions- May 23, 2025Senate(S) Died in Process
- Mar 28, 2025House(H) 2nd Reading
- Mar 28, 2025House(H) Scheduled for 2nd Reading
- Mar 25, 2025HouseCommittee(H) Committee Report
- Mar 24, 2025HouseCommittee(H) Committee Executive Action
- Mar 3, 2025House(H) 1st Reading
Show 24 earlier actions
- Mar 3, 2025HouseCommittee(H) Referred to Committee
- Mar 1, 2025Senate(S) Transmitted to House
- Mar 1, 2025Senate(S) 3rd Reading
- Mar 1, 2025Senate(S) Scheduled for 3rd Reading
- Feb 28, 2025Senate(S) 2nd Reading
- Feb 28, 2025Senate(S) Scheduled for 2nd Reading
- Feb 13, 2025SenateCommittee(S) Committee Report
- Feb 13, 2025SenateCommittee(S) Committee Executive Action
- Feb 7, 2025Senate(S) Hearing Canceled
- Feb 7, 2025Senate(S) Hearing
- Jan 25, 2025Senate(S) Hearing Canceled
- Jan 7, 2025SenateCommittee(S) Referred to Committee
- Jan 6, 2025Senate(S) 1st Reading
- Dec 18, 2024SenateIntroduced(S) Introduced
- Dec 9, 2024House(LC) Draft Delivered to Requester
- Dec 6, 2024House(LC) Draft Ready for Delivery
- Dec 5, 2024House(LC) Draft in Assembly
- Dec 4, 2024House(LC) Draft in Final Drafter Review
- Dec 4, 2024House(LC) Draft in Input/Proofing
- Dec 4, 2024House(LC) Draft in Edit
- Dec 2, 2024House(LC) Draft in Legal Review
- Nov 8, 2024House(LC) Drafter Assigned
- Nov 7, 2024House(LC) Draft in Legal Review
- Oct 24, 2024House(LC) Drafter Assigned
Version history
Only one version on file - nothing to compare yet. As later stages (committee substitute, engrossed, enrolled) are captured, the redline appears here.
View official text →Lobbying Activity
No state lobbying filings in our records match this bill. Federal lobbying reports (LDA) cover Congress, so they are not listed on state bills.
Full breakdown
Who this bill affects and the strongest case for and against it, written only from the bill’s own text.
Sponsors
Discoveries
Patterns POLISCOPE noticed across the record. These are observations to investigate, not conclusions.
Exemption from Contempt for State Leadership Actions
The bill creates an explicit statutory shield preventing civil or criminal contempt findings against elected officials when a writ of mandamus is jointly vacated by legislative and executive leaders.
Connected Entities
Sources
bills.legmt.gov
Analysis Score
0–100- Significance20Lowered because this bill did not pass (its text scored 60)
- Controversy80Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
- Entertainment10Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
- Buzz25Current news / social attention level
Publisher tools
