POLISCOPE
Back to bills
Part ofCourts →

The civic record

Read. Follow. Verify.
Did Not Advance

West Virginia Bill Grants Supreme Court Discretion Over Judicial Support Staff Pay Scales

Original title: Relating generally to allowing the Supreme Court of Appeals discretion to create uniform pay scales for all levels of judicial support staff.

Last action · March 4, 2026: To FinanceSponsors: Clay Riley and 1 other

Introduced
Committee
Floor Vote
Passed
Law

Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.

Public stanceCommunity reactions are separate from the official record and reporting.

What This Bill Proposed

West Virginia House Bill 4360 grants the Supreme Court of Appeals the discretion to establish uniform pay scales for s, magistrate assistants, deputy clerks, family court secretary-clerks, and s instead of fixing those salaries directly by statute.

Why it matters

Changes how judicial support staff compensation is determined across magistrate and family courts by shifting authority to set pay scales from the legislature to the state Supreme Court.

Background
  • The Supreme Court of Appeals of West Virginia is the state's court of last resort, overseeing the unified judicial system including magistrate and family courts. context

Who It Would Have Affected

Groups the bill's text would have affected, as described in the record. Being affected is not a position for or against it.

Directly affected

Magistrate court clerks

Their annual salary determination method changes from fixed statutory amounts to a pay scale established by the Administrative Director of the Supreme Court.

Directly affected

Magistrate assistants

Their compensation structure shifts from a statutorily fixed amount to a pay scale determined by the Administrative Director of the Supreme Court.

Directly affected

Family court case coordinators

Key Facts

You don't have to trust us. Each fact below is taken straight from the official document - click any one to see the exact passage, highlighted in the original.

Frequently Asked Questions

Does this bill affect existing general salary increases for state employees?
Yes, judicial support staff remain eligible to receive any general salary increases granted to state employees whose salaries are not set by statute.

What else do you want to know?

News Coverage

No news coverage found yet. Articles are indexed twice daily.

Where This Stands

This bill did not become law - Died at adjournment · passed the House · in Senate committee.

Procedural history

18 actions
  1. Mar 4, 2026SenateCommittee
    To Finance
  2. Mar 4, 2026SenateCommittee
    To Finance
  3. Mar 4, 2026SenateIntroduced
    Introduced in Senate
  4. Mar 3, 2026House
    Communicated to Senate
  5. Mar 3, 2026HouseFloor
    Passed House (Roll No. 255)
  6. Mar 3, 2026House
    Read 3rd time
Show 12 earlier actions
  1. Mar 3, 2026House
    On 3rd reading, Special Calendar
  2. Mar 2, 2026House
    Read 2nd time
  3. Mar 2, 2026House
    On 2nd reading, Special Calendar
  4. Feb 27, 2026House
    Read 1st time
  5. Feb 27, 2026House
    On 1st reading, Special Calendar
  6. Feb 26, 2026House
    Do pass
  7. Feb 5, 2026HouseCommittee
    To House Finance
  8. Jan 29, 2026HouseCommittee
    To House Appropriations
  9. Jan 15, 2026HouseCommittee
    To House Finance
  10. Jan 15, 2026HouseIntroduced
    Introduced in House
  11. Jan 15, 2026HouseCommittee
    To Finance
  12. Jan 15, 2026HouseIntroduced
    Filed for introduction

Version history

Only one version on file - nothing to compare yet. As later stages (committee substitute, engrossed, enrolled) are captured, the redline appears here.

View official text →

Lobbying Activity

No state lobbying filings in our records match this bill. Federal lobbying reports (LDA) cover Congress, so they are not listed on state bills.

Full breakdown

Who this bill affects and the strongest case for and against it, written only from the bill’s own text.

Sponsors

Discoveries

1 pattern noticed across the record

Patterns POLISCOPE noticed across the record. These are observations to investigate, not conclusions.

policy shift95% confidence

Centralization of Judicial Pay Administration

Shifts salary determination authority from rigid statutory enactments to administrative discretion by the state Supreme Court.

Connected Entities

Administrative Director of the Supreme Court, Supreme Court of Appeals, John Paul Hott and 1 more
PersonAdministrative Director of the Supreme Court“Authorized to establish pay scales for judicial support staff”Map →
OrganizationSupreme Court of Appeals“Granted discretion to create uniform pay scales for judicial support staff”Map →
PersonJohn Paul Hott“Co-sponsor of House Bill 4360”Map →
PersonClay Riley“Lead sponsor of House Bill 4360”Map →

Sources

Open source document

www.wvlegislature.gov

Analysis Score

0–100
  • Significance20
    Lowered because this bill did not pass (its text scored 60)
  • Controversy15
    Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
  • Entertainment5
    Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
  • Buzz20
    Current news / social attention level

Publisher tools

Share or embed this record

POLISCOPE publisher tools

Share or embed this record