POLISCOPE
Back to bills

The civic record

Read. Follow. Verify.
Did Not Advance

Connecticut restructures timelines and rules for human rights complaints before the CHRO

Original title: AN ACT CONCERNING THE DISPOSITION OF CASES BEFORE THE COMMISSION ON HUMAN RIGHTS AND OPPORTUNITIES.

Last action · April 30, 2026: House Calendar Number 538

Introduced
Committee
Floor Vote
Passed
Law

Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.

What This Bill Proposed

Senate Bill 399 modifies case handling by the Commission on Human Rights and Opportunities by requiring requests to occur before a draft investigative report is issued, updating standards for reopening closed complaints, and replacing certain statutes of limitations with a 90-day deadline after receiving a .

Why it matters

Changes procedural deadlines and filing requirements for individuals pursuing discrimination complaints before state administrative bodies and courts, replacing multi-year limitation statutes with a strict 90-day window following a .

Who It Would Have Affected

Groups the bill's text would have affected, as described in the record. Being affected is not a position for or against it.

Directly affected

Complainants

Individuals filing discrimination complaints face new procedural deadlines and restrictions on requesting early legal intervention and reopening closed matters.

Directly affected

Respondents

Parties responding to complaints are subject to updated timelines and rules regarding early legal intervention and the reopening of closed proceedings.

Directly affected

Commission on Human Rights and Opportunities

The agency's authority to reopen closed complaints is expanded, and its staff and legal counsel operate under new statutory timelines for case disposition.

Key Facts

You don't have to trust us. Each fact below is taken straight from the official document - click any one to see the exact passage, highlighted in the original.

Frequently Asked Questions

When must a request for early legal intervention be made under the bill?
A request for must be made after the and before a draft investigative report is issued.

What else do you want to know?

News Coverage

No news coverage found yet. Articles are indexed twice daily.

Where This Stands

This bill did not become law - Died at adjournment · passed the Senate · on the House floor.

Procedural history

13 actions
  1. Apr 30, 2026House
    House Calendar Number 538
  2. Apr 30, 2026House
    Favorable Report, Tabled for the Calendar, House
  3. Apr 29, 2026House
    Rules Suspended, Transmitted to the House
  4. Apr 29, 2026SenateFloor
    Senate Passed
  5. Apr 9, 2026Connecticut General Assembly
    File Number 565
  6. Apr 9, 2026Senate
    Senate Calendar Number 331
Show 7 earlier actions
  1. Apr 9, 2026Senate
    Favorable Report, Tabled for the Calendar, Senate
  2. Apr 9, 2026Connecticut General Assembly
    Reported Out of Legislative Commissioners' Office
  3. Apr 2, 2026Connecticut General Assembly
    Referred to Office of Legislative Research and Office of Fiscal Analysis 04/08/26 5:00 PM
  4. Mar 24, 2026Connecticut General Assembly
    Filed with Legislative Commissioners' Office
  5. Mar 23, 2026Connecticut General Assembly
    Joint Favorable Substitute
  6. Mar 16, 2026Connecticut General Assembly
    Public Hearing 03/20
  7. Mar 3, 2026Connecticut General AssemblyCommittee
    Referred to Joint Committee on Judiciary

Version history

Only one version on file - nothing to compare yet. As later stages (committee substitute, engrossed, enrolled) are captured, the redline appears here.

View official text →

Lobbying Activity

No state lobbying filings in our records match this bill. Federal lobbying reports (LDA) cover Congress, so they are not listed on state bills.

Full breakdown

Who this bill affects and the strongest case for and against it, written only from the bill’s own text.

Discoveries

1 pattern noticed across the record

Patterns POLISCOPE noticed across the record. These are observations to investigate, not conclusions.

policy shift95% confidence

Tightened Timelines for Legal Intervention and Filings

The legislation establishes stricter procedural deadlines by capping when early legal intervention can be requested and replacing general limitation statutes with a 90-day post-release filing requirement.

Connected Entities

Commission on Human Rights and Opportunities, Office of Public Hearings, Superior Court and 1 more
OrganizationCommission on Human Rights and Opportunities“State agency responsible for investigating complaints of discriminatory practice”Map →
OrganizationOffice of Public Hearings“Commission office handling final decisions.”Map →
OrganizationSuperior Court“Court where appeals and civil actions related to commission complaints are filed”Map →
OrganizationJudiciary Committee“Legislative committee that reported the substitute bill.”Map →

Sources

Analysis Score

0–100
  • Significance20
    Lowered because this bill did not pass (its text scored 60)
  • Controversy15
    Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
  • Entertainment5
    Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
  • Buzz20
    Current news / social attention level

Publisher tools

Share or embed this record

POLISCOPE publisher tools

Share or embed this record