POLISCOPE
Back to bills

The civic record

Read. Follow. Verify.
High Impact

Missouri House Bill 2361 makes nonconsensual altered sexual depictions a class C felony and sets website removal rules

Original title: ALTERED SEXUAL DEPICTIONS

Last action · February 26, 2026: HCS Reported Do Pass (H)Sponsors: Melissa Schmidt and 1 other

Introduced
Committee
Floor Vote
Passed
Law

Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.

What This Bill Would Do

Missouri House Bill 2361 establishes criminal penalties and civil remedies for generating, soliciting, or promoting nonconsensual digital s of identifiable persons. The bill classifies the offense as a , allows victims to sue for injunctive relief and statutory damages of ten thousand dollars or actual damages, and requires covered online platforms to establish a removal request process by December 31, 2026.

Why it matters

Residents can face charges for creating or sharing nonconsensual digital forgeries, while websites hosting user content must implement takedown request procedures within 48 hours or face unfair trade practice penalties.

Background
  • House Bill 2361 was introduced in the Missouri House of Representatives during the 2026 Regular Session to address nonconsensual digital media alterations. context
  • State legislative measures addressing nonconsensual altered sexual depictions have been introduced across multiple states to combat digitally manipulated media. context

Who It Would Affect

Groups the bill's text would affect if enacted, as described in the record. Being affected is not a position for or against it.

Directly affected

Identifiable persons

Individuals receive new legal protections, civil lawsuit options, and statutory damage rights against unauthorized digital depictions.

Directly affected

Covered platforms

Websites and online services hosting user content must establish a written notice and 48-hour removal process or face unfair trade practice penalties.

Not affected

Law enforcement officers

Law enforcement officers and agencies are explicitly exempted from the criminal and civil penalties while performing official duties.

Key Facts

You don't have to trust us. Each fact below is taken straight from the official document - click any one to see the exact passage, highlighted in the original.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is considered an altered sexual depiction under this bill?
An is any visual depiction resulting from digital, electronic, mechanical, or other modification that depicts a realistic version of an identifiable person with nude body parts of another person, computer-generated nude body parts, or engaging in sexual conduct without their consent.
What must online platforms do when notified of nonconsensual content?
s must remove the and make reasonable efforts to remove known identical copies as soon as practicable, but not later than 48 hours after receiving a valid removal request.
Can a disclaimer protect someone from criminal liability if they share an altered image?
No, the presence of a disclaimer notifying viewers that the depicted person did not consent or participate is not a defense and does not relieve a person of criminal liability.

What else do you want to know?

News Coverage

No news coverage found yet. Articles are indexed twice daily.

Where This Stands

Currently in committee. The next step in the legislative lifecycle is Floor Vote.

Procedural history

8 actions
  1. Feb 26, 2026HouseCommittee
    HCS Reported Do Pass (H)
  2. Feb 25, 2026HouseCommittee
    HCS Voted Do Pass (H)
  3. Feb 25, 2026House
    Executive Session Completed (H)
  4. Feb 16, 2026House
    Public Hearing Completed (H)
  5. Jan 8, 2026HouseCommittee
    Referred: Emerging Issues(H)
  6. Jan 8, 2026HouseFloor
    Read Second Time (H)
Show 2 earlier actions
  1. Jan 7, 2026HouseIntroduced
    Read First Time (H)
  2. Dec 10, 2025HouseIntroduced
    Prefiled (H)

Version history

Only one version on file - nothing to compare yet. As later stages (committee substitute, engrossed, enrolled) are captured, the redline appears here.

View official text →

Lobbying Activity

No state lobbying filings in our records match this bill. Federal lobbying reports (LDA) cover Congress, so they are not listed on state bills.

Full breakdown

Who this bill affects and the strongest case for and against it, written only from the bill’s own text.

Sponsors

Discoveries

1 pattern noticed across the record

Patterns POLISCOPE noticed across the record. These are observations to investigate, not conclusions.

policy shift95% confidence

Establishment of Direct Platform Takedown Deadlines

The bill imposes a strict 48-hour takedown window on covered platforms receiving valid removal requests, backed by unfair trade practice penalties.

Connected Entities

General Assembly, Mike Jones, Melissa Schmidt and 1 more
OrganizationGeneral Assembly“Legislative body of the state of Missouri”Map →
PersonMike Jones“Cosponsor of the bill”Map →
PersonMelissa Schmidt“Representative introducing House Bill 2361”Map →
OrganizationFederal Communications Commission“Federal regulatory agency referenced regarding communication services”Map →

Sources

Analysis Score

0–100
  • Significance85
    How much this matters to a regular citizen
  • Controversy40
    Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
  • Entertainment10
    Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
  • Buzz55
    Current news / social attention level

Publisher tools

Share or embed this record

POLISCOPE publisher tools

Share or embed this record