POLISCOPE
Back to bills

The civic record

Read. Follow. Verify.
Did Not Advance

Utah bill creates a voter referendum process for Supreme Court rulings declaring state laws unconstitutional

Original title: Utah Supreme Court Referendum Amendments

Last action · March 6, 2026: House/ filedSponsor: Matt MacPherson

Introduced
Committee
Floor Vote
Passed
Law

Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.

What This Bill Proposed

This bill establishes a formal process allowing Utah voters to approve or reject any Supreme Court opinion that holds a state law unconstitutional. If sponsors gather enough valid signatures, the Supreme Court's ruling is temporarily ed and placed on the ballot for a public vote at a regular general or special election.

Why it matters

Residents gain direct authority to accept or overturn high court rulings on state statutes, which temporarily pauses those court decisions from taking effect while petitions circulate and alters how constitutional rulings are finalized.

Background
  • State referenda allow citizens to petition to approve or reject legislative statutes or constitutional interpretations through a public ballot vote. context

Who It Would Have Affected

Groups the bill's text would have affected, as described in the record. Being affected is not a position for or against it.

Directly affected

Utah registered voters

Voters gain the legal right to sign petitions and vote to approve or reject Supreme Court opinions that declare state laws unconstitutional.

Directly affected

Petition sponsors

Sponsors are subject to specific application deadlines, signature-gathering quotas across multiple Senate districts, and strict verification and email notice requirements.

Directly affected

Supreme Court

The court's constitutional rulings are subject to public stay and potential voter rejection through the new referendum process.

Key Facts

You don't have to trust us. Each fact below is taken straight from the official document - click any one to see the exact passage, highlighted in the original.

Frequently Asked Questions

What happens to a Supreme Court ruling if a referendum petition gathers enough signatures?
The lieutenant governor issues an order temporarily ing the Supreme Court's opinion from going into effect while the certification process continues and until the measure is decided by voters or fails.
How many signatures are required to place a Supreme Court opinion on the ballot?
Sponsors must obtain legal signatures equal to 8% of active voters statewide on January 1 following the last regular general election, and meet that same 8% threshold in at least 15 Senate districts.
Who prepares the ballot language and summary for the referendum?
The Office of Legislative Research and General Counsel prepares an impartial short title of 25 words or fewer and an impartial summary of 125 words or fewer.

What else do you want to know?

News Coverage

No news coverage found yet. Articles are indexed twice daily.

Where This Stands

This bill did not become law - Died at adjournment · introduced in the House.

Procedural history

11 actions
  1. Mar 6, 2026House
    House/ filed
  2. Mar 6, 2026House
    House/ strike enacting clause
  3. Mar 3, 2026House
    House/ received fiscal note from Fiscal Analyst
  4. Mar 2, 2026Released
    LFA/ fiscal note publicly available for HB0600
  5. Mar 2, 2026Version Sponsor
    LFA/ fiscal note sent to sponsor for HB0600
  6. Feb 26, 2026HouseIntroduced
    House/ 1st reading (Introduced)
Show 5 earlier actions
  1. Feb 26, 2026House
    House/ received bill from Legislative Research
  2. Feb 26, 2026Legislative Fiscal Agency
    LFA/ bill sent to agencies for fiscal input for HB0600
  3. Feb 26, 2026Legislative Fiscal Analyst
    LFA/ bill assigned to staff for fiscal analysis for HB0600
  4. Feb 26, 2026Legislative Research and General Counsel
    Numbered Bill Publicly Distributed
  5. Feb 26, 2026Legislative Research and General Counsel
    Bill Numbered but not Distributed

Version history

Only one version on file - nothing to compare yet. As later stages (committee substitute, engrossed, enrolled) are captured, the redline appears here.

View official text →

Lobbying Activity

No state lobbying filings in our records match this bill. Federal lobbying reports (LDA) cover Congress, so they are not listed on state bills.

Full breakdown

Who this bill affects and the strongest case for and against it, written only from the bill’s own text.

Sponsors

Discoveries

1 pattern noticed across the record

Patterns POLISCOPE noticed across the record. These are observations to investigate, not conclusions.

policy shift95% confidence

Introduction of Judicial Referenda

The bill creates a novel procedural framework in Utah allowing voters to directly challenge state supreme court rulings that find statutes unconstitutional.

Connected Entities

Office of Legislative Research and General Counsel, Matt MacPherson, Supreme Court
OrganizationOffice of Legislative Research and General Counsel“Assigned to prepare impartial short titles and summaries for qualifying referend”Map →
PersonMatt MacPherson“Chief sponsor of House Bill 600 in the Utah House of Representatives.”Map →
OrganizationSupreme Court“The state high court whose unconstitutionality rulings become subject to voter r”Map →

Sources

Analysis Score

0–100
  • Significance20
    Lowered because this bill did not pass (its text scored 85)
  • Controversy75
    Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
  • Entertainment15
    Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
  • Buzz60
    Current news / social attention level

Publisher tools

Share or embed this record

POLISCOPE publisher tools

Share or embed this record