POLISCOPE
Back to feed
NewsTimes of San DiegoOctober 30, 2026San Diego County

Alejandro Maciel examines the banality of evil and individual accountability in public service

Photo: Times of San Diego

An opinion piece reflects on Hannah Arendt's concept of the 'banality of evil' following an encounter with an ICE agent defending family separations by stating he was just following orders. The author examines how ordinary people in institutions routinely shift moral responsibility upward, arguing that legal compliance does not erase personal moral accountability.

Read the full story at Times of San Diego

Why It Matters

The article questions how institutional workers and government employees justify actions with severe human consequences under the defense of following orders, touching on ongoing debates surrounding immigration enforcement.

Key Facts

  • The author recalls an encounter where an ICE agent defended destroying working-class families by stating he was just following orders.
  • Hannah Arendt developed the theory of the 'banality of evil' after covering the 1961 trial of Adolf Eichmann in Jerusalem.
  • Eichmann presented himself not as an ideologue, but as an ordinary, gray bureaucrat who merely completed assigned tasks.
  • Arendt's conclusion was that the core problem is the renunciation of independent thought rather than exceptional individual malevolence.
  • Post-World War II Nuremberg trials established that obedience to orders does not completely erase personal guilt or responsibility.
  • The author notes that legality and moral responsibility have historically diverged, citing past legal systems that supported slavery and racial segregation.

Who's Mentioned