POLISCOPE
Back to bills

The civic record

Read. Follow. Verify.
Passed

Arizona Legislature urges federal reform of the Endangered Species Act and Migratory Bird Conservation Act to protect ranchers

Original title: endangered species act; urging reform

Last action · April 20, 2026: Transmit to Secretary of StateSponsor: Lupe Diaz

Introduced
Committee
Floor Vote
Passed
Law

Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.

Public stanceCommunity reactions are separate from the official record and reporting.

What This Bill Would Do

The Arizona Legislature officially urges the President, Congress, and federal land management agencies to reform the and the Migratory Bird Conservation Act to reduce regulatory burdens and stop lease cancellations for rural ranchers.

Why it matters

The measure carries no legal force or funding changes, serving instead as a formal petition from the state legislature requesting federal policy changes regarding grazing leases and wildlife protection.

Background
  • A concurrent memorial in Arizona is an official resolution passed by both chambers of the state legislature to express the state's position or petition the federal government, but it does not have the force of law. context
  • The Endangered Species Act of 1973 is a foundational federal law implemented primarily by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service and the National Marine Fisheries Service to protect imperiled species. context

Who It Would Affect

Groups the bill's text would affect if enacted, as described in the record. Being affected is not a position for or against it.

Directly affected

Arizona ranchers

The memorial directly addresses grazing lease cancellations and regulatory burdens affecting ranchers on federally controlled lands.

Directly affected

Federal land management agencies

The Bureau of Land Management, U.S. Forest Service, and U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service are formally asked to adopt policies reducing regulatory requirements.

Key Facts

  • The Arizona Legislature requests that the President and Congress reform the Endangered Species Act of 1973 and the Migratory Bird Conservation Act.
  • The memorial asserts that federal implementation of conservation laws has caused unfair lease cancellations and the eviction of ranchers from grazing lands.
  • The Legislature asks the Bureau of Land Management, U.S. Forest Service, and Fish and Wildlife Service to adopt policies reducing regulatory burdens on ranchers.
  • The measure highlights ranching and grazing as core components of rural culture, customs, and economies in Arizona.
Show all 5 facts
  • The Secretary of State of Arizona is directed to transmit copies of the memorial to the President, congressional leaders, Arizona congressional members, and relevant federal agency heads.

Frequently Asked Questions

Does this memorial change federal or state law?
No. As a , it expresses the opinion of the Arizona Legislature and petitions federal officials for policy changes, but it does not enact new laws or regulations.
Which federal agencies are asked to change their policies?
The memorial asks the Bureau of Land Management, the U.S. Forest Service, and the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service to adopt policies that prevent unfair lease cancellations and reduce regulatory burdens.

What else do you want to know?

News Coverage

No news coverage found yet. Articles are indexed twice daily.

Where This Stands

Currently passed both. The next step in the legislative lifecycle is Law.

Procedural history

16 actions
  1. Apr 20, 2026Enrolled
    Transmit to Secretary of State
  2. Apr 16, 2026House
    Transmit to House
  3. Apr 16, 2026SenateFloor
    PASSED
  4. Apr 15, 2026Senate
    DP
  5. Mar 23, 2026Senate
    PFC
  6. Mar 16, 2026SenateCommittee
    DP
Show 10 earlier actions
  1. Mar 10, 2026SenateFloor
    Senate Second Reading
  2. Mar 9, 2026SenateIntroduced
    Senate First Reading
  3. Feb 26, 2026Senate
    Transmit to Senate
  4. Feb 26, 2026HouseFloor
    PASSED
  5. Feb 23, 2026House
    DP
  6. Feb 16, 2026House
    C&P
  7. Feb 9, 2026HouseCommittee
    DP
  8. Jan 14, 2026HouseFloor
    House Second Reading
  9. Jan 13, 2026HouseIntroduced
    House First Reading
  10. Jan 8, 2026HouseIntroduced
    Prefiled

Version history

Only one version on file - nothing to compare yet. As later stages (committee substitute, engrossed, enrolled) are captured, the redline appears here.

View official text →

Lobbying Activity

No state lobbying filings in our records match this bill. Federal lobbying reports (LDA) cover Congress, so they are not listed on state bills.

Full breakdown

Who this bill affects and the strongest case for and against it, written only from the bill’s own text.

Sponsors

Connected Entities

United States Forest Service, Lupe Diaz, Western Governors' Association and 3 more
OrganizationUnited States Forest Service“Federal agency urged to reduce regulatory requirements on ranchers”Map →
PersonLupe Diaz“Representative who introduced HCM 2006”Map →
OrganizationWestern Governors' Association“Association supporting proactive, cooperative, and science-based conservation ef”Map →
OrganizationBureau of Land Management“Federal agency urged to adopt policies reducing regulatory requirements”Map →
OrganizationUnited States Fish and Wildlife Service“Federal agency urged to adopt policies reducing regulatory burdens”Map →
OrganizationDepartment of the Interior“Federal department urged to reform wildlife and conservation acts”Map →

Sources

Open source document

apps.azleg.gov

Analysis Score

0–100
  • Significance25
    How much this matters to a regular citizen
  • Controversy45
    Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
  • Entertainment5
    Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
  • Buzz15
    Current news / social attention level

Publisher tools

Share or embed this record

POLISCOPE publisher tools

Share or embed this record