Part ofLegal Aid →

The civic record

Read. Follow. Verify.

S5499FEDERALFederal Billfiled

High Impact

Fair Access to Legal Counsel Act of 2024

Record date · December 12, 2024

Companion · HR 10403same policy, House version

Bill progressHistory & official text ↓

Introduced

Committee

Floor Vote

Passed

Law

Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.

Public stanceCommunity reactions are separate from the official record and reporting.

What This Bill Would Do

This bill establishes new standards for federal courts to appoint legal counsel for individuals who cannot afford an attorney, particularly in civil rights and housing cases. It requires courts to evaluate specific personal and case-related factors when deciding whether to provide a lawyer to those representing themselves.

Why it matters

The bill changes the criteria and process for low-income individuals to receive court-appointed counsel in federal civil cases, potentially increasing the likelihood of legal representation for those navigating complex litigation without an attorney.

Who It Would Affect

Groups the bill's text would affect if enacted, as described in the record. Being affected is not a position for or against it.

Directly affected

Pro se litigants

Individuals representing themselves in federal court will have a standardized process for requesting and being evaluated for court-appointed counsel.

Directly affected

Federal courts

Judges and court staff must follow new, specific criteria when evaluating requests for counsel and managing related data reporting.

Key Facts

You don't have to trust us. Each fact below is taken straight from the official document - click any one to see the exact passage, highlighted in the original.

Frequently Asked Questions

Does this bill guarantee a lawyer for everyone in federal court?

No. It establishes a formal process for courts to evaluate requests for counsel, but the decision to appoint an attorney remains at the court's discretion based on the factors outlined in the bill.

What happens to my private information if I request a lawyer?

The bill requires courts to take steps to protect the privacy of personal details shared during the request process, such as using sealed filings or , and prevents the opposing party from accessing these specific details.

What else do you want to know?

News Coverage

No news coverage found yet. Articles are indexed twice daily.

Follow the record

Votes, people, money & the original source

Where This Stands

Currently filed. The next step in the legislative lifecycle is Committee.

Version history

Only one version on file - nothing to compare yet. As later stages (committee substitute, engrossed, enrolled) are captured, the redline appears here.

View official text →

Full breakdown

Who this bill affects and the strongest case for and against it, written only from the bill’s own text.

Discoveries

1 pattern noticed across the record

Patterns POLISCOPE noticed across the record. These are observations to investigate, not conclusions.

policy shift100% confidence

Formalization of Counsel Appointment

The bill shifts from a discretionary, informal process for appointing counsel in civil cases to a highly structured, factor-based evaluation system.

Administrative Office of the United States Courts

Connected Entities

House of Representatives, Van Hollen, Committee on the Judiciary and 3 more

OrganizationHouse of Representatives“The bill was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary.”Map →

PersonVan Hollen“Mr. Van Hollen introduced the bill.”Map →

OrganizationCommittee on the Judiciary“The bill was referred to this committee.”Map →

bill numberCivil Rights Act of 1964“Specifically, Title VII and Title VIII of the Act are referenced.”Map →

OrganizationSenate“The Senate introduced the bill.”Map →

otherUnited States Code“The bill amends specific sections of the United States Code.”Map →

Sources

Open source document

www.congress.gov

Analysis Score

0–100

Significance75
How much this matters to a regular citizen
Controversy40
Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
Entertainment5
Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
Buzz20
Current news / social attention level

Publisher tools