POLISCOPE
Back to bills

The civic record

Read. Follow. Verify.
Did Not Advance

Connecticut Senate approves $3.5 million for Whiting Forensic Hospital community transition settlement

Original title: RESOLUTION APPROVING THE SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT IN ISAIAH LINDSAY, ET AL. V. NANCY NAVARETTA IN HER OFFICIAL CAPACITY AS COMMISSIONER OF THE DEPARTMENT OF MENTAL HEALTH AND ADDICTION SERVICES, ET AL.

Last action · April 21, 2026: File Number 708Sponsor: Martin Looney

Introduced
Committee
Floor Vote
Passed
Law

Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.

What This Bill Proposed

The Connecticut Senate approved a settlement agreement in Isaiah Lindsay, et al. v. Nancy Navaretta that requires expenditures exceeding $2.5 million to support timely community discharges from Whiting Forensic Hospital. The resolution incurs costs of approximately $3.5 million in 2027 and $7 million in fiscal year 2028 for the Department of Mental Health and Addiction Services.

Why it matters

The state commits multi-million dollar expenditures from the to fund mental health community transition services, independent reviewer services, and legal fees.

Who It Would Have Affected

Groups the bill's text would have affected, as described in the record. Being affected is not a position for or against it.

Directly affected

Department of Mental Health and Addiction Services

The department incurs costs of approximately $3.5 million in FY 27 and $7 million in FY 28 to implement the settlement agreement.

Directly affected

Disability Rights Connecticut

The organization receives $435,000 in attorneys' fees under the settlement agreement.

Directly affected

Connecticut Legal Rights Projects

The organization receives $12,000 in expenses under the settlement agreement.

Key Facts

You don't have to trust us. Each fact below is taken straight from the official document - click any one to see the exact passage, highlighted in the original.

Frequently Asked Questions

What does Senate Resolution 10 approve?
It approves the provisions of the settlement agreement in Isaiah Lindsay, et al. v. Nancy Navaretta that require expenditures in excess of $2.5 million.
What are the financial impacts of the resolution on the state?
The resolution results in a cost to the Department of Mental Health and Addiction Services of approximately $3.5 million in 2027 and $7 million in fiscal year 2028.
What happens if the General Assembly fails to approve the agreement?
If the General Assembly does not approve the settlement agreement in the specified timeframe, it becomes null and void and unenforceable.

What else do you want to know?

News Coverage

No news coverage found yet. Articles are indexed twice daily.

Where This Stands

This resolution did not become law - Died at adjournment · on the Senate floor.

Procedural history

10 actions
  1. Apr 21, 2026Connecticut General Assembly
    File Number 708
  2. Apr 21, 2026Senate
    Senate Calendar Number 435
  3. Apr 21, 2026Senate
    Favorable Report, Tabled for the Calendar, Senate
  4. Apr 21, 2026Connecticut General Assembly
    Reported Out of Legislative Commissioners' Office
  5. Apr 14, 2026Connecticut General Assembly
    Referred to Office of Legislative Research and Office of Fiscal Analysis 04/20/26 5:00 PM
  6. Apr 14, 2026Connecticut General Assembly
    Filed with Legislative Commissioners' Office
Show 4 earlier actions
  1. Apr 14, 2026Connecticut General Assembly
    Public Hearing 04/14
  2. Apr 13, 2026Senate
    Senate Favorable
  3. Apr 7, 2026Connecticut General AssemblyCommittee
    Referred to Joint Committee on Appropriations
  4. Apr 2, 2026Senate
    Filed with Senate Clerks

Version history

Only one version on file - nothing to compare yet. As later stages (committee substitute, engrossed, enrolled) are captured, the redline appears here.

View official text →

Lobbying Activity

No state lobbying filings in our records match this bill. Federal lobbying reports (LDA) cover Congress, so they are not listed on state bills.

Full breakdown

Who this bill affects and the strongest case for and against it, written only from the bill’s own text.

Sponsors

Connected Entities

Connecticut Legal Rights Projects, Whiting Forensic Hospital, United States District Court, District of Connecticut and 6 more
OrganizationConnecticut Legal Rights Projects“Organization receiving expenses under the settlement agreement.”Map →
OrganizationWhiting Forensic Hospital“Facility from which individuals transition into the community.”Map →
locationUnited States District Court, District of Connecticut“Federal court handling civil action No. 3:22-CV-1518-SVN.”Map →
PersonNancy Navaretta“Commissioner of the Department of Mental Health and Addiction Services.”Map →
OrganizationDepartment of Mental Health and Addiction Services“State agency incurring costs under the settlement agreement.”Map →
otherGeneral Fund“State fund used to pay for the settlement requirements.”Map →
OrganizationDisability Rights Connecticut“Organization receiving attorneys' fees under the settlement agreement.”Map →
PersonIsaiah Lindsay“Lead plaintiff in the lawsuit against Nancy Navaretta.”Map →
OrganizationPsychiatric Security Review Board“Board to which acquittees are committed.”Map →

Sources

Analysis Score

0–100
  • Significance20
    Lowered because this bill did not pass (its text scored 65)
  • Controversy30
    Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
  • Entertainment5
    Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
  • Buzz20
    Current news / social attention level

Publisher tools

Share or embed this record

POLISCOPE publisher tools

Share or embed this record