The civic record
Read. Follow. Verify.Indiana Establishes Tort Reform Commission and Limits Public Nuisance Lawsuits by State Agencies
Last action · February 19, 2026: Committee report: amend do pass, adoptedSponsors: Matt Lehman and 5 others
Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.
What This Bill Would Do
House Bill 1417 creates a 15-member Tort Reform Commission to review civil actions, damages, and medical malpractice claims, and limits state and agency lawsuits to prospective and damages. The measure also raises the statutory cap on attorney's fees, costs, and expenses awarded under s from $5,000 to $100,000, taking effect upon passage and July 1, 2026.
State agencies and the state government face new restrictions confining claims to requests for and rather than expansive financial damages. Meanwhile, civil litigants face a significantly higher fee-shifting ceiling when rejecting s.
Who It Would Affect
Groups the bill's text would affect if enacted, as described in the record. Being affected is not a position for or against it.
State of Indiana and state agencies
Governmental entities face new statutory limitations restricting public nuisance lawsuits to injunctive relief and abatement costs.
Civil litigants and offerors
Parties making qualified settlement offers are subject to a raised attorney's fees and costs recovery cap of up to $100,000 if the final judgment is less favorable to the recipient.
Key Facts
You don't have to trust us. Each fact below is taken straight from the official document - click any one to see the exact passage, highlighted in the original.
Frequently Asked Questions
What does the newly created Tort Reform Commission do?
How does the bill change public nuisance lawsuits brought by state entities?
What changes are made to settlement offer awards?
What else do you want to know?
News Coverage
Follow the record
Votes, people, money & the original sourceWhere This Stands
Currently passed both. The next step in the legislative lifecycle is Law.
Procedural history
12 actions- Feb 19, 2026SenateFloorCommittee report: amend do pass, adopted
- Feb 5, 2026SenateIntroducedFirst reading: referred to Committee on Judiciary
- Feb 3, 2026HouseReferred to the Senate
- Feb 2, 2026HouseSenate sponsors: Senators Baldwin, Garten
- Feb 2, 2026HouseFloorThird reading: passed; Roll Call 187: yeas 61, nays 34
- Jan 29, 2026HouseAmendment #1 (Campbell) motion withdrawn voice vote
Show 6 earlier actions
- Jan 29, 2026HouseFloorSecond reading: ordered engrossed
- Jan 27, 2026HouseFloorCommittee report: amend do pass, adopted
- Jan 22, 2026HouseRepresentative Zimmerman added as coauthor
- Jan 8, 2026HouseIntroducedFirst reading: referred to Committee on Judiciary
- Jan 8, 2026HouseCoauthored by Representatives Snow, Pressel
- Jan 8, 2026HouseAuthored by Representative Lehman
Version history
Only one version on file - nothing to compare yet. As later stages (committee substitute, engrossed, enrolled) are captured, the redline appears here.
View official text →Lobbying Activity
No state lobbying filings in our records match this bill. Federal lobbying reports (LDA) cover Congress, so they are not listed on state bills.
Full breakdown
Who this bill affects and the strongest case for and against it, written only from the bill’s own text.
Sponsors
Show 1 more sponsor
Discoveries
Patterns POLISCOPE noticed across the record. These are observations to investigate, not conclusions.
Narrowing of Government Public Nuisance Powers
The legislation specifically constrains state and state-agency public nuisance actions, limiting remedies to abatement and barring recovery for potential future harms.
Connected Entities
Sources
iga.in.gov
Analysis Score
0–100- Significance75How much this matters to a regular citizen
- Controversy65Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
- Entertainment10Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
- Buzz40Current news / social attention level
Publisher tools
