POLISCOPE
Back to feed
Part ofZoning →

The civic record

Read. Follow. Verify.
Passed

Approval of Rezoning RZ-PD 20-1265 Following Court Order

Original title: RZ-PD 20-1265, pursuant to Mattamy Tampa/Sarasota, LLC, et al v. Hillsborough County Approve rezoning RZ-PD 20-1265, pursuant to the court’s ruling in Mattamy Tampa/Sarasota, LLC, et al v. Hillsborough County, Case No. 21-CA-3990, which granted the petition for certiorari filed by Mattamy Tampa/Sarasota, LLC (“Mattamy”) and quashed the Board’s denial of RZ-PD 20-1265. On April 3, 2023, Judge Gabbard in her Order Granting Petition for Writ of Certiorari found that Mattamy had met their burden of proof to show that RZ-PD 20-1265 was compatible with the Comprehensive Plan and met procedural requirements, and the judge further ruled that the record on appeal did not contain competent, substantial evidence that RZ-PD 20-1265 was inconsistent with the Comprehensive Plan or that maintaining the existing zoning classification accomplished a legitimate public purpose.

Record date · May 9, 2023

Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.

Public stanceCommunity reactions are separate from the official record and reporting.

What This Bill Does

Hillsborough County has approved the rezoning application RZ-PD 20-1265 to comply with a court ruling. This action follows a judge's decision that the county's previous denial of the request lacked sufficient evidence.

Why it matters

This decision finalizes the land-use status for the property associated with the Mattamy Tampa/Sarasota, LLC development project, following a successful legal challenge against the county's initial denial.

Who It Affects

Groups the bill's text affects, as described in the record. Being affected is not a position for or against it.

Directly affected

Mattamy Tampa/Sarasota, LLC

The developer's rezoning application was approved following their successful legal challenge.

Directly affected

Hillsborough County

The county is required to implement the rezoning as ordered by the court.

Key Facts

You don't have to trust us. Each fact below is taken straight from the official document - click any one to see the exact passage, highlighted in the original.

Frequently Asked Questions

Why was this rezoning approved?
The approval was mandated by a court order after a judge determined that the county's previous denial lacked sufficient evidence and that the project met all necessary requirements.
What is the status of the rezoning application?
The application, RZ-PD 20-1265, has been approved by the Board of County Commissioners.

What else do you want to know?

News Coverage

No news coverage found yet. Articles are indexed twice daily.

Full breakdown

Who this bill affects and the strongest case for and against it, written only from the bill’s own text.

Discoveries

1 pattern noticed across the record

Patterns POLISCOPE noticed across the record. These are observations to investigate, not conclusions.

policy shift100% confidence

Court-Mandated Zoning Approval

The county's decision to approve the rezoning was not voluntary but a direct result of a judicial order finding the previous denial lacked evidentiary support.

Connected Entities

Case No. 21-CA-3990, Hillsborough County, Mattamy Tampa/Sarasota, LLC and 1 more

Sources

Open source document

webapi.legistar.com

Analysis Score

0–100
  • Significance65
    How much this matters to a regular citizen
  • Controversy50
    Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
  • Entertainment20
    Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
  • Buzz15
    Current news / social attention level

Publisher tools

Share or embed this record

POLISCOPE publisher tools

Share or embed this record