The civic record
Read. Follow. Verify.Texas raises emergency services district employee expenditure limit without board approval to $50,000
Last action · May 22, 2025: No action taken in committeeSponsors: John Lujan and 2 others
Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.
What This Bill Proposed
employees in Texas may now make expenditures up to $50,000 without prior board approval if they have executed a required bond, raising the limit from $2,000 starting September 1, 2025.
Expedites routine operational purchases for local s by eliminating the requirement for full board approval on expenditures between $2,000 and $50,000, provided the employee is properly bonded.
Who It Would Have Affected
Groups the bill's text would have affected, as described in the record. Being affected is not a position for or against it.
Emergency services district employees
District employees who execute the required bond are granted the authority to disburse funds up to $50,000 without prior board approval.
Emergency services district boards
Key Facts
You don't have to trust us. Each fact below is taken straight from the official document - click any one to see the exact passage, highlighted in the original.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is the new spending limit an emergency services district employee can make without board approval?
What else do you want to know?
News Coverage
Follow the record
Votes, people, money & the original sourceWhere This Stands
This bill did not become law - Died at adjournment · passed the House · in Senate committee.
Procedural history
31 actions- May 22, 2025SenateNo action taken in committee
- May 22, 2025SenateScheduled for public hearing on . . .
- May 19, 2025SenateCommitteeReferred to Local Government
- May 19, 2025SenateIntroducedRead first time
- May 12, 2025SenateReceived from the House
- May 12, 2025HouseReported engrossed
Show 25 earlier actions
- May 12, 2025HouseStatement(s) of vote recorded in Journal
- May 12, 2025HouseFloorRecord vote (RV#2128)
- May 12, 2025HouseFloorPassed
- May 12, 2025HouseFloorRead 3rd time
- May 10, 2025HouseStatement(s) of vote recorded in Journal
- May 10, 2025HouseFloorRecord vote (RV#2079)
- May 10, 2025HouseFloorPassed to engrossment
- May 10, 2025HouseLaid out as postponed business
- May 1, 2025HousePostponed (5/10/25 10:00 AM)
- May 1, 2025HouseFloorRead 2nd time
- May 1, 2025HousePlaced on General State Calendar
- Apr 28, 2025HouseConsidered in Calendars
- Apr 23, 2025HouseCommittee report sent to Calendars
- Apr 22, 2025HouseCommittee report distributed
- Apr 22, 2025HouseComte report filed with Committee Coordinator
- Apr 7, 2025HouseCommitteeReported favorably w/o amendment(s)
- Apr 7, 2025HouseConsidered in formal meeting
- Apr 7, 2025HouseRecalled from subcommittee
- Mar 24, 2025HouseLeft pending in subcommittee
- Mar 24, 2025HouseTestimony taken/registration(s) recorded in subcommittee
- Mar 24, 2025HouseConsidered by s/c in public hearing
- Mar 24, 2025HouseScheduled for public hearing in s/c on . . .
- Mar 12, 2025HouseCommitteeReferred to s/c on County & Regional Government by Speaker
- Mar 12, 2025HouseIntroducedRead first time
- Dec 17, 2024HouseIntroducedFiled
Version history
Only one version on file - nothing to compare yet. As later stages (committee substitute, engrossed, enrolled) are captured, the redline appears here.
View official text →Lobbying Activity
No state lobbying filings in our records match this bill. Federal lobbying reports (LDA) cover Congress, so they are not listed on state bills.
Full breakdown
Who this bill affects and the strongest case for and against it, written only from the bill’s own text.
Sponsors
Connected Entities
Sources
capitol.texas.gov
Analysis Score
0–100- Significance20Lowered because this bill did not pass (its text scored 40)
- Controversy10Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
- Entertainment5Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
- Buzz15Current news / social attention level
Publisher tools
