The civic record
Read. Follow. Verify.West Virginia authorizes municipalities to recover property demolition costs through special tax assessments
Last action · March 5, 2026: To JudiciarySponsors: Flanigan and 10 others
Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.
What This Bill Proposed
West Virginia municipalities are authorized to adopt ordinances that recover the reasonable costs of repairing, altering, improving, or demolishing unsafe buildings by placing special tax assessments on the real property. The measure establishes detailed notice and contest procedures for property owners, allows installment payment plans, and provides municipal courts with authority for salvageable structures.
Property owners face direct financial liability for municipal building demolition or repair costs through s tied to their property taxes, while municipalities gain an expanded legal mechanism to recover taxpayer funds spent on abating unsafe structures.
- West Virginia municipalities regulate unsafe structures under state code provisions that dictate procedures for inspections, owner notification, and corrective actions. context
Who It Would Have Affected
Groups the bill's text would have affected, as described in the record. Being affected is not a position for or against it.
Property owners
Property owners face potential cost recovery actions, special tax assessments, receivership proceedings, or demolition of structures deemed unsafe or unsanitary.
Municipalities
Municipalities gain broad authority to adopt ordinances regulating unsafe structures, recover abatement costs through special tax assessments, and enter into memorandums of understanding with county commissions.
County tax officials
County tax officials are responsible for entering certified special assessments onto land books and collecting them alongside ad valorem real property taxes.
Key Facts
- Municipalities are granted plenary power to adopt ordinances requiring property owners to pay for the repair, alteration, improvement, vacating, closing, removal, or demolition of unsafe or unsanitary structures.
- Reasonable and necessary costs incurred by a municipality for building remediation or demolition may constitute a special assessment against the real property.
- Prior to imposing a special assessment, the municipality must provide written notice to the owner of record by certified mail or posting, detailing the work performed and proposed assessment amount.
- Property owners are given an opportunity to contest proposed assessments before a municipal judge or official within 30 days of notice.
Show all 10 facts
- Certified special assessments are entered on county land books and collected in the same manner and with the same priority, interest, and penalties as ad valorem real property taxes.
- Municipalities may authorize the payment of special assessments in installments under general terms established by the governing body.
- Special assessments imposed under this specific subsection are governed exclusively by this section and are exempt from the provisions of §8-18-1 et seq.
- Municipal courts are authorized to place salvageable structures into receivership with the municipality or another capable entity if specific safety and entry conditions are met.
- Municipalities may seek the aid of a county commission through a memorandum of understanding to destroy or demolish certain dilapidated structures.
- Administrative search warrants from municipal or magistrate courts may be obtained if code enforcement officials are refused entry or owners cannot be located after reasonable inquiry.
Frequently Asked Questions
How are property owners notified before a municipality performs demolition or imposes a special assessment?
Can property owners pay special assessments in installments?
What happens if a property owner does not respond to a notice of unsafe building conditions?
What else do you want to know?
News Coverage
Follow the record
Votes, people, money & the original sourceWhere This Stands
This bill did not become law - Died at adjournment · passed the House · in Senate committee.
Procedural history
17 actions- Mar 5, 2026SenateCommitteeTo Judiciary
- Mar 5, 2026SenateCommitteeTo Judiciary
- Mar 5, 2026SenateIntroducedIntroduced in Senate
- Mar 4, 2026HouseCommunicated to Senate
- Mar 4, 2026HouseFloorPassed House (Roll No. 291)
- Mar 4, 2026HouseRead 3rd time
Show 11 earlier actions
- Mar 4, 2026HouseOn 3rd reading, Special Calendar
- Mar 3, 2026HouseRead 2nd time
- Mar 3, 2026HouseOn 2nd reading, Special Calendar
- Mar 2, 2026HouseRead 1st time
- Mar 2, 2026HouseImmediate consideration
- Mar 2, 2026HouseBy substitute, do pass
- Jan 30, 2026HouseCommitteeTo House Local Governments
- Jan 29, 2026HouseCommitteeTo House Government Organization
- Jan 29, 2026HouseIntroducedIntroduced in House
- Jan 29, 2026HouseCommitteeTo Government Organization
- Jan 29, 2026HouseIntroducedFiled for introduction
Version history
Only one version on file - nothing to compare yet. As later stages (committee substitute, engrossed, enrolled) are captured, the redline appears here.
View official text →Lobbying Activity
No state lobbying filings in our records match this bill. Federal lobbying reports (LDA) cover Congress, so they are not listed on state bills.
Full breakdown
Who this bill affects and the strongest case for and against it, written only from the bill’s own text.
Sponsors
Connected Entities
Sources
www.wvlegislature.gov
Analysis Score
0–100- Significance20Lowered because this bill did not pass (its text scored 75)
- Controversy40Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
- Entertainment10Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
- Buzz30Current news / social attention level
Publisher tools
