POLISCOPE
Back to bills

The civic record

Read. Follow. Verify.

Missouri bill establishes standard for severing unconstitutional provisions from legislative acts

Original title: Creates provisions regarding the severability of provisions in a legislative act

Last action · May 7, 2026: Second Read and Referred S General Laws CommitteeSponsor: Curtis Trent

Introduced
Committee
Floor Vote
Passed
Law

Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.

What This Bill Would Do

Courts would be required to sever any unconstitutional provision of a legislative act while keeping the remaining valid provisions in force, unless shows the General Assembly would not have passed the law without the invalid part.

Why it matters

Determines whether an entire state law is struck down or only the specific portion found unconstitutional when legal challenges succeed in court.

Who It Would Affect

Groups the bill's text would affect if enacted, as described in the record. Being affected is not a position for or against it.

Directly affected

General Assembly

The legal presumption governing legislative intent when laws face constitutional challenges is altered.

Directly affected

courts

Judges must follow a specific statutory presumption and clear and convincing evidence standard when evaluating laws with unconstitutional provisions.

Key Facts

You don't have to trust us. Each fact below is taken straight from the official document - click any one to see the exact passage, highlighted in the original.

Frequently Asked Questions

What happens if a part of a state law is ruled unconstitutional under this bill?
The unconstitutional part is , and the rest of the law remains in effect unless shows the legislature would not have passed the law without the invalid part.
What counts as clear and convincing evidence that an entire law should be invalidated?
It includes a finding that the remaining valid provisions, standing alone, are incomplete and incapable of being executed in accordance with legislative intent.

What else do you want to know?

News Coverage

No news coverage found yet. Articles are indexed twice daily.

Where This Stands

Currently in committee. The next step in the legislative lifecycle is Floor Vote.

Procedural history

2 actions
  1. May 7, 2026SenateFloor
    Second Read and Referred S General Laws Committee
  2. Feb 26, 2026SenateIntroduced
    S First Read

Version history

Only one version on file - nothing to compare yet. The text on record is the 7491S.01I - Introduced version. As later stages (committee substitute, engrossed, enrolled) are captured, the redline appears here.

View official text →

Lobbying Activity

No state lobbying filings in our records match this bill. Federal lobbying reports (LDA) cover Congress, so they are not listed on state bills.

Full breakdown

Who this bill affects and the strongest case for and against it, written only from the bill’s own text.

Sponsors

Connected Entities

Curtis Trent, General Assembly
PersonCurtis Trent“Senator representing District 20 who introduced SB 1797.”Map →
OrganizationGeneral Assembly“The legislative body of the state responsible for enacting laws.”Map →

Sources

Open source document

www.senate.mo.gov

Analysis Score

0–100
  • Significance60
    How much this matters to a regular citizen
  • Controversy25
    Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
  • Entertainment5
    Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
  • Buzz15
    Current news / social attention level

Publisher tools

Share or embed this record

POLISCOPE publisher tools

Share or embed this record