POLISCOPE
Back to bills

The civic record

Read. Follow. Verify.
High Impact

Massachusetts bill requires state and municipal public works contracts to use U.S.-made iron, steel, and manufactured goods

Original title: An Act to promote American manufacturing

Last action · October 20, 2025: Bill reported favorably by committee and referred to the committee on House Ways and MeansSponsors: Jeff Roy and 6 others

Introduced
Committee
Floor Vote
Passed
Law

Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.

Public stanceCommunity reactions are separate from the official record and reporting.

What This Bill Would Do

State and municipal agencies and authorities must include provisions in public building and public works contracts requiring all iron, steel, fabricated steel, and manufactured goods to be produced in the United States. The requirement applies to construction projects exceeding $500,000 under , subject to specific waiver exceptions and a 30-day public notice requirement. Persons found to have intentionally affixed false 'Made in America' labels are barred from state contracts.

Why it matters

Contractors bidding on public building and infrastructure projects face mandatory domestic sourcing rules and potential for mislabeling materials, while agencies must administer public comment periods for material waivers on projects.

Who It Would Affect

Groups the bill's text would affect if enacted, as described in the record. Being affected is not a position for or against it.

Directly affected

contractors and subcontractors on public works

Contractors must source domestic iron, steel, and manufactured goods for public projects and face contract debarment for intentional mislabeling violations.

Directly affected

state or municipal agencies

Agencies must incorporate domestic sourcing provisions into public contracts, administer 30-day public comment periods for waivers, and publish justifications.

Directly affected

domestic steel manufacturers and fabricators

Producers receive preference in public agency procurement contracts for iron, steel, and manufactured goods.

Key Facts

You don't have to trust us. Each fact below is taken straight from the official document - click any one to see the exact passage, highlighted in the original.

Frequently Asked Questions

What public projects are affected by this requirement?
The requirement applies to contracts for the construction, reconstruction, alteration, repair, improvement, or maintenance of a public building or public works made by a state or municipal agency, including construction projects exceeding $500,000.
Are there any exceptions where foreign materials can still be used?
Yes, a waiver can be issued if the agency head finds that domestic application is contrary to the public interest, U.S. materials are not available in sufficient quantities or satisfactory quality, or including domestic material increases the overall project cost by more than 25 percent. Additionally, projects are exempt if fewer than three U.S. steel manufacturers or fabricators submit responsive bids.
What happens if a contractor falsely claims foreign goods were made in America?
Any person determined by a court or agency to have intentionally affixed a false 'Made in America' label or misrepresented foreign goods as domestic becomes ineligible to receive any contract or subcontract with the state.

What else do you want to know?

News Coverage

No news coverage found yet. Articles are indexed twice daily.

Where This Stands

Currently in committee. The next step in the legislative lifecycle is Floor Vote.

Procedural history

4 actions
  1. Oct 20, 2025HouseCommittee
    Bill reported favorably by committee and referred to the committee on House Ways and Means
  2. Jul 3, 2025Joint
    Hearing scheduled for 07/15/2025 from 01:00 PM-05:00 PM in B-1
  3. Feb 27, 2025Senate
    Senate concurred
  4. Feb 27, 2025HouseCommittee
    Referred to the committee on State Administration and Regulatory Oversight

Version history

Only one version on file - nothing to compare yet. As later stages (committee substitute, engrossed, enrolled) are captured, the redline appears here.

View official text →

Lobbying Activity

No state lobbying filings in our records match this bill. Federal lobbying reports (LDA) cover Congress, so they are not listed on state bills.

Full breakdown

Who this bill affects and the strongest case for and against it, written only from the bill’s own text.

Sponsors

Connected Entities

Jeff Roy, Attorney General
PersonJeff Roy“Representative who filed the petition for House No. 3411”Map →
OrganizationAttorney General“Authorized to enforce the section regarding intentional violations”Map →

Sources

Open source document

malegislature.gov

Analysis Score

0–100
  • Significance75
    How much this matters to a regular citizen
  • Controversy40
    Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
  • Entertainment10
    Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
  • Buzz35
    Current news / social attention level

Publisher tools

Share or embed this record

POLISCOPE publisher tools

Share or embed this record