POLISCOPE
Back to bills

The civic record

Read. Follow. Verify.
High Impact

Vermont establishes privacy protections for mobile IDs and restricts automated traffic camera images

Original title: An act relating to privacy protections for mobile identification and images recorded by automated traffic law enforcement systems

Last action · April 9, 2025: Read 1st time & referred to Committee on TransportationSponsor: Tanya Vyhovsky

Introduced
Committee
Floor Vote
Passed
Law

Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.

Public stanceCommunity reactions are separate from the official record and reporting.

What This Bill Would Do

Vermont establishes strict privacy requirements for mobile driver's licenses and identification cards, prohibiting law enforcement from taking physical possession of devices and limiting the retention and use of automated traffic camera images starting July 1, 2025.

Why it matters

Residents gain explicit legal rights to control what personal data is shared via digital IDs and can sue for statutory damages of $2,500 for negligent violations or $5,000 for intentional violations, while automated traffic camera images are barred from general public records and other surveillance uses.

Who It Would Affect

Groups the bill's text would affect if enacted, as described in the record. Being affected is not a position for or against it.

Directly affected

Mobile identification holders

Individuals using digital IDs gain explicit consent rights over data sharing, protection against device seizure by law enforcement, and the right to sue for privacy violations.

Directly affected

Law enforcement officers

Officers are barred from taking physical possession of individuals' electronic devices to inspect mobile identifications.

Directly affected

Private entities and verification system operators

Businesses face civil penalties and enforcement actions by the Attorney General if they improperly collect, retain, or condition services on mobile ID access.

Key Facts

  • The Commissioner of Motor Vehicles may issue mobile identifications that support both full and limited profiles while allowing the holder to keep physical possession of their device.
  • Access to mobile identification data through a verification system requires the holder's explicit consent.
  • Law enforcement officers are prohibited from taking physical possession of a device to access a mobile identification or verify identity.
  • Digital service providers and application developers are prohibited from collecting, retaining, or sharing mobile ID data beyond what is necessary to comply with law.
Show all 9 facts
  • Businesses cannot condition the offer or use of goods and services on access to an individual's mobile identification, with specific exceptions for age, financial, or medical verification.
  • Individuals aggrieved by a violation may bring a civil action in Superior Court seeking $2,500 for negligent violations or $5,000 for intentional violations, plus attorney's fees.
  • Automated traffic law enforcement (ATLE) systems shall only record speeding violations and shall not be used for general surveillance purposes.
  • Recorded images from traffic enforcement systems shall only be accessed to determine if a violation occurred in the prior 12 months and are exempt from public records inspection.
  • This act takes effect on July 1, 2025.

Frequently Asked Questions

Can police take my phone to check my mobile driver's license?
No. The bill explicitly prohibits law enforcement officers from taking physical possession of the device on which a mobile identification is accessed.
What happens if a business or private entity violates my mobile ID privacy?
Aggrieved individuals can bring a civil action in Superior Court for damages of $2,500 for negligent violations or $5,000 for intentional violations, alongside attorney's fees. Additionally, the Attorney General or a State's Attorney may bring enforcement actions.
Can traffic enforcement cameras be used for general surveillance?
No. are restricted solely to recording speeding violations and cannot be used for any other purpose or general surveillance.

What else do you want to know?

News Coverage

No news coverage found yet. Articles are indexed twice daily.

Where This Stands

Currently in committee. The next step in the legislative lifecycle is Floor Vote.

Procedural history

1 action
  1. Apr 9, 2025SenateIntroduced
    Read 1st time & referred to Committee on Transportation

Version history

Only one version on file - nothing to compare yet. As later stages (committee substitute, engrossed, enrolled) are captured, the redline appears here.

View official text →

Lobbying Activity

No state lobbying filings in our records match this bill. Federal lobbying reports (LDA) cover Congress, so they are not listed on state bills.

Full breakdown

Who this bill affects and the strongest case for and against it, written only from the bill’s own text.

Sponsors

Connected Entities

Department of Motor Vehicles, Agency of Transportation, Attorney General and 2 more
OrganizationDepartment of Motor Vehicles“State agency responsible for issuing mobile identifications”Map →
OrganizationAgency of Transportation“State agency handling contracts for automated traffic law enforcement systems”Map →
PersonAttorney General“Empowered to bring enforcement actions against private entities for violations”Map →
OrganizationDepartment of Public Safety“Consulted by the Agency of Transportation regarding traffic camera data storage ”Map →
OrganizationGeneral Assembly of the State of Vermont“Enacting body of the state legislature”Map →

Sources

Open source document

legislature.vermont.gov

Analysis Score

0–100
  • Significance75
    How much this matters to a regular citizen
  • Controversy40
    Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
  • Entertainment5
    Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
  • Buzz35
    Current news / social attention level

Publisher tools

Share or embed this record

POLISCOPE publisher tools

Share or embed this record