POLISCOPE
Back to feed

The civic record

Read. Follow. Verify.

Proposed Increase to Federal Court 'Amount in Controversy' Requirement

Original title: Text of Senate Amendment 6226

Record date · June 24, 2026

Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.

What This Bill Does

Senate Amendment 6226 proposes raising the minimum financial threshold required to file certain civil cases in federal district courts from $75,000 to $150,000. The amendment also establishes a mechanism for automatic, inflation-based adjustments to this threshold every ten years starting in 2030.

Why it matters

This amendment would change the minimum financial value of a legal dispute required for a plaintiff to bring a case in federal court, potentially shifting more civil litigation to state courts.

Who It Affects

Groups the bill's text affects, as described in the record. Being affected is not a position for or against it.

Directly affected

Civil litigants

Plaintiffs seeking to file civil lawsuits in federal court would face a higher financial threshold to establish jurisdiction.

Directly affected

Federal district courts

The courts would see changes to the types of cases that meet the jurisdictional requirements for federal filing.

Key Facts

You don't have to trust us. Each fact below is taken straight from the official document - click any one to see the exact passage, highlighted in the original.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the 'amount in controversy'?
It is the minimum dollar value of a legal claim required for a case to be heard in a federal district court rather than a state court.
How often will this amount change if the amendment passes?
The threshold would be adjusted every ten years, starting on January 1, 2030.

What else do you want to know?

News Coverage

No news coverage found yet. Articles are indexed twice daily.

Full breakdown

Who this bill affects and the strongest case for and against it, written only from the bill’s own text.

Discoveries

1 pattern noticed across the record

Patterns POLISCOPE noticed across the record. These are observations to investigate, not conclusions.

policy shift100% confidence

Automatic Inflation Indexing

The amendment moves away from static jurisdictional thresholds by mandating automatic, CPI-based adjustments every decade.

Connected Entities

Administrative Office of the United States Courts, Christopher Coons, Mr. Kennedy and 3 more
OrganizationAdministrative Office of the United States Courts“Responsible for calculating and publishing the adjusted dollar amounts.”Map →
PersonChristopher Coons“U.S. Senator who co-sponsored the amendment.”Map →
PersonMr. Kennedy“U.S. Senator who submitted the amendment.”Map →
OrganizationDepartment of Labor“Agency responsible for publishing the Consumer Price Index used for adjustments.”Map →
PersonMr. Cruz“U.S. Senator who co-sponsored the amendment.”Map →
PersonMr. Whitehouse“U.S. Senator who co-sponsored the amendment.”Map →

Sources

Open source document

www.govinfo.gov

Analysis Score

0–100
  • Significance65
    How much this matters to a regular citizen
  • Controversy40
    Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
  • Entertainment5
    Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
  • Buzz10
    Current news / social attention level

Publisher tools

Share or embed this record

POLISCOPE publisher tools

Share or embed this record