POLISCOPE

The public record

SARASOTA (SARASOTA COUNTY) · LOCALHeld · official record pendingPartial coverage

Development Review Committee

Wednesday, July 15, 2026 · Government meeting record

The 30-second read

Record incomplete

The Sarasota Development Review Committee will review four upcoming development applications on July 15, 2026, including mixed-use buildings, a 7-Eleven with fueling stations, a property rezone, and a restaurant and retail redevelopment.

Why it matters

Residents can review proposed commercial and residential construction projects that may alter neighborhood traffic, building heights, and land use across Sarasota.

What happens next

The scheduled meeting date has passed. Minutes or an action agenda are not published in the records we hold.

This meeting date has passed and no official outcome record has been published yet. Nothing on this page is a decision.

Captured actions

5

Recorded outcomes

0

Source artifacts

2

Transcript and record text

Closed captionsWhat was said at the meeting, transcribed Sep 20, 2026. Speech is not a decision.
  • No speaker turns were supplied with this transcript.
  • This transcript has no source timestamps.
  • No speaker identities were supplied with this transcript.

brief overview of the project. >> Morning for the record, my name is the care came with card. Now. >> Tony left lot of with their engineering. spent on general contractor. is a kind of people view the This will be our second review for the year C basically the the process can be a 4 building well as a part of department by parking second parking and some residential units residential and space. Well, commercial Well, that project. Perfect. Thank you very much. All right. So for the record, I'm Kevin city planner with staff. >> And here are the zoning comments for today. First up, are the requirements and regulations that remain unresolved. One. Update the site data table to include the required versus proposed development standards of the North Trail. And North Trump overlay district outlined in Table 6, 5, 0, 3, in Section 6, 9.10, including required versus proposed density high, etcetera. Some columns are left with not applicable for Valley is as today's meeting, please provide the projects proposed height in stories in the zoning data section consistent with and Todd Standards update the maximum height in the North Trail Zone district. 35 feet consistent with table 6, 5, 0, 3, a 3. Too per Section 6, 9, 10 to 3 day, an 8 foot pedestrian space with a 6.5 foot amenity spaces required along the north time. Trump frontage the amenity space must also include canopy. Trees were achievable. Please revised the plans to include the required amenity space. As of this meeting, police to mention the required a manatee zone on the plans to determine compliance pursuant to Section 6, 9, 10 D 3, a manatee zone is required to be minimum of 6.5 feet. And with it any point fronting North Tamiami trail, I understand there was to average out the 6.5 feet. And if you want to meet later to discuss that, I'd be happy to do so. But the standard is the talking. For a 3 sections, 6, 9.10, TC 4 requires frontage is a lot North trail to provide minimum death of 20 feet for projects utilizing the and Todd, please revise the plans to remove the parking from this layer and dimension 20 be available space for the full length and height of the first story of the building. Please note that the stairwells elevators lobbies and other associated building service space may be allowed to contribute up to 20%. 20% of the available space requirement. This will need to be revised based on the available space requirement was said about as of today's meeting, please to mention the 20 foot bubble space depth on the first floor of the plans to determine compliance and relocate those 2 parking spaces to comply with the 20 foot depth of habitable space requirement. For a 4 section 6, 9, 10, D 3 C 3 requires at least one main entrance of a commercial or mixed use building to face the sidewalk along North Trail or the corner of North Tamiami trail. And the about extreme entrances, Shelby emphasize with landscaping, lighting and or recessed from the Passat. The provided entrance appears more secondary as an access is the stairwell. Please provides to provide the main entrance. As of today's clarify how the entrances emphasized pursuant to Section 6, 9, 10, D 3 C 3. We saw the change was made just some more clarity on that front. But the. >> So I just have a quick question with regards to that So I I just want to clarify that there are ways for us to sort of emphasize that main entrance as the comment notes through things like landscaping and signage. But that that is not actually required to access a commercial portion of the actual development itself. So if it is accessing some sort of like a without be sufficient to satisfy the comment for the entrance along North Tamiami trail. >> I believe so. It could be some time to review that. No such a Thank you. All right. For number 5, a 5 rather, please provide further information regarding how refuse recycling pickup will be achieved. Well, the truck have to back into the public right of way after loading or as of today, State zoning Code section 7 to 13 D does not allow trucks to back out into the right of way. Please revise. Number 6 per section 6, 9, 0, 9.10, D C 6. Please provide the location of any mechanical equipment and detail as to how it will be screened. Is any mechanical equipment proposed on the road today. He just much on the 5 on there. So and down to tonight as well on their So we have some pretty in-depth conversation. Design with solid waste. >> And I showing was fixable with there. But the truck back up right away on out. So is is there. The comic con of is is 5, 9, are comical misconduct. Each other is present player. Dion on what you're looking for and that is more design. Okay to the truck moving in there. That sort of thing that kind of seem to go. and then little little putting on there. >> Understood. per per the zoning >> the the backing in backing out is not allowed. And we we want to acknowledge that you have these conversations with solid waste and that they were cool with what you have proposed. At the end of the day, we still need to see turning temple in the plan set. So if that could be provided, that would be great. I can also get you more clarity on that. I am today as well. So it was first turning so backing out will not be allowed. Just just. >> Or can apologize. And again, on that are we able to apply for some sort of an adjustment to allow for solid waste collection has proposed? >> I have to look into that >> for number 6, a as of today's meeting to mention the height of all items about the roof to determine compliance with Section 6, 1, of 2 people. For a 7 further clarification as required regarding how the project meets the parking minimums. The project narrative states that 11,040 square feet commercial and residential units are proposed. Well, the site data table shows a total of 10,152 Square feet of commercial use based on the project narrative. 39.5 running up to 40 parking spaces are required to be in compliance with Section 6, 9, 10 to 9. We've had plenty of extensive conversations between the Very something officials and case over. So there's been a little more clarity on so for today's meeting, the update to that is pursuant to Section 7 to 13, a 2 loading spaces required for developments that can take between 10,000 to 50,000 Square feet of floor area. Update the site data table and plans to reflect the incorporation of one require own. That means the requirements of section 7 to 13 B, 3 G and included turning let so in reference to 5, 9 as well. Just that turned Please provide additional information regarding the proposed monument sign on the corner of North Tamiami Trail and 13th Street to show compliance with Section 6, 9, 10, 10, please confirm the heightened proposed site area for the money that sign. We understand that it's not the intention of the applicants provide the monument sign at this time in this case, just remove it >> For a 9 per section 7 to 13. The trucks cannot back into the street. And as you mentioned, this is a similar comment to 5. >> So he was owning acknowledges solid waste, revealed the plan to back out of the living space. The turning still require for review to understand the maneuver. A time. Per section 7, 2, 0, 3.11, parking garage and shot the screen with material of no less than 50% of city and expenses longer than 25 feet or higher than 3.5 feet. So the architecturally designed, please provide greater detail on the building elevations to show compliance with this requirement. We did see that there was a an attempt to communicate that on the televisions for today's meeting. Our noble be identify how expanse is longer than 25 feet or higher than 3, 1, half architecturally examples given vertical or horizontal changes and while playing landscape race planters decorative you port. Sorry, Grill work or decorative masonry patterns and dimension. The architecturally designed expenses on the plans. We just want to see some clarity on the site plans for how the structure parking screen with materials of no less than 50% capacity. Whether that's just providing a percentage list of materials so on and so forth. That should resolve that issue. And as for the DRC for this number one, provide elevations for all 4 sides of the proposed building include the total height as measured from finished floor to finish feeling number 2, pursuant to Section 6, 9, 10 3 B, clarify how the development provides architectural treatment that emphasizes the >> didn't have a quick question on as well. So I believe our plans currently a tower structure or return it on that And as we reviewed the coded, it seem that that would be an acceptable option for the city. Is that something that could satisfy that requirement? Yeah. Just make sure to provide in morning Yeah. >> For number 3, pursuant to Section 6, 9, 10 to 7 provide a pedestrian circulation system that complies with the requirements of Section 6, 9, one. 33 and label on site. Plan. And for number 4 to mention the setback on the east from the staircase and update in the site data table. >> So just a quick question of that. Just a clarification on the record set back for that side. There. Are you able to provide some clarity as far as what the setback is for the area there? >> Yeah, for Can you remind me what? And that's that. >> He's yet to sign. Yeah. So there's of what we found out in the code. Is there The property is a residential property, Howard's own commercially. So from our stating the setback, choose their own aside. That's where Jason to commercial property. >> I can take a look at in a second. Absolutely. Provide that for you for me. Make a little note on my computer here as well for that one. Moving on to be one for the preliminary and traffic conditions. This one is just staying on here. So we remember to incorporate it into the staff report see, there are no requested or required for this one. And for advisory, what the long-term bike parking appears to be located inside of the retail store. Please consider relocating the long term by the parking to a place that's more accessible to potential residents. Provide an updated that lists the names and contact information for all desired points. Contact for this application. Anyone not listed under the will not receive project related communications staff. We understand that there was. A long process to get here. We just want to make sure that we know who to contact the first time. >> Thank you. We are working on updating those materials and we'll have them to shortly. And just to go back to the preliminary draft conditions. I just wanted to confirm the point of contact for that. So should I work with you or the city attorney's office on that agreement or who would be the best to contact appeal for e-mail the the point of contact. >> And when that's all done, make sure to fill out the proper attorney, all that Perfect. Thank you very much. And then as an additional at the end of June, I sent out a an extension form for documents on up to sign. It has yet to be Tried to reach out a couple times if you could try to get him to not the side of the much. Appreciate Thank you. Of course. And then for solid waste and recycling. They have no further comments. They seem to be resolved in the communication that the referenced. To reset her or utilities and engineer. We have on the requirements and regulations. >> For new DRC comments. One demolition plan. She'll show existing agents gravity, Maine gravity wastewater main manholes in the existing 6 inches. Wastewater service shall be kept at the main. The manholes Shelby barricaded in clearly protected during the motion. To possible lot of service and the irrigation service backflow preventer shall be placed immediately after the water meters. >> is it just that to these been look like the on that one? >> Yeah. Okay. If it's in the easement it just we just don't want it too much between the meter, OK? No problem. A the size of the pros. Derek proposed irrigation meters shall be shown on the next plan. Some middle per. >> City of Sarasota, Utilities, Department. Standard details the for the existing 3 Sea water main located in the right away beneath the proposed improvements she'll be placed with replaced with an 8 PVC Dr. 18 water main or it may. And at the end, doctor, all because if it's in the road, are we're being told Cip is now putting and act all and they want us to stress ductile just the replacement Miss Turner. Some point. I think we'd like to schedule a follow-up meeting with your office to discuss >> but I just wanted to clarify. So would for the existing 3 inch water main be sufficient to serve the needs of the development as proposed in a requesting that we up size essentially this water main. >> We need to get 3 see out of out of your construction and out of driveway. it is our policy to upgrade when things are improved, there's an 8 inch that was installed on. I believe that stepped out on the south side of the project. it is our. It is per our That we upgrade. As far as the flow for your project. I'm not sure that would be, you know, your engineer had Alex, but is it when we replace when we asked someone to replace a line we go our minimum size, which is a for commercial. >> Yes. We could potentially schedule a I think that would be helpful. Thank you. 5. The fire line back foot backflow preventer should be moved inside the property. 6. The proposed wastewater Service line show runs straight. >> And then it goes into a 45 into the lie. That's just for clarity on the fans 7. And Ft. DOH permit may be required by the state. Number 8, 8, 8, Thank you utility to demand shall be updated with the most current. I believe the one submitted was older one. The preliminary draft conditions. There is none. There is no medication. it is just the standard advisory. Good morning. Checking her, at least in the >> Comments that remain unresolved street off site trees with tree protection areas that overlap with in the propose word area. Let's be shown on the site plan. show the cypress trees off site on the property to the north on the site plan. They must be properly identified and shown with proper tree protection. And then a new comments based on a new information. Number one, it is the intent of this provision that no tree shall be granted for removal. Any tree where the applicant has failed to design and locate the proposed improvements to minimize removal Tuesday. During the recent site visit, it was mentioned that the 3 black olive trees on the property could potentially be retained. If those trees cannot be retained, police justify the removals as per the city code requires. And number 2, a type a buffer must be continue was in the continuous row and may not contain any development. Impervious surfaces. site features that do not function to meet the standards of section 7, 303, device, a landscape plan to correct it interrupted buffers adjacent to the neighboring residential properties. >> Just a quick question about when they're on that just the other side of the west side of air, there's so you do is request an easement along that pretty much are some of the property. So are we allowed install the required giving within that utility easement? >> What you said on the West side, sorry, these sites are you said yes on the size asked the question again, these on the east side, the properties, the >> commercial zone proper, the residential structure there >> the utility partners Asus a grand even along that side there because there's 6 you long go through there. Are we are you asking us to install the latest giving within easement utility easement or >> how to be site? It has to be on site. >> You know, have conversation or even meet on site that you just think about the engineering and I can be included. >> Personally, I the intent of the landscaping was to move it out of >> It's just that the code says it has to erupted. Okay. Are okay. Number 3, the 16 inch tree located in the northwest corner of the property has been misidentified. The trees black, all of a not a lower low. Please revise and number 4, the on the existing trees table, please indicate that the 2 Sable Palms are being retained. And like I said, we can meet on site. >> Possible should. Thank Makar just users his car. We have new homes at this time. We many departments have no comments, a warning by Brits building department. We have no comments. And in addition, Sarasota County Fire Department has no comment Stuckey trafficking currency comments. So prior the years, the comments that remain unresolved number one percent transportation action strategy. 2.2 sides, driveways, no wider than necessary to accommodate designed vehicle solid waste. Trucks may pull into the opposite lane to complete the term preferred maximum driveway with this 20 feet. Subsection a per ease him figure St 11 the driveway with his measured at the property line and shall not exceed 24 feet for multifamily residences. The proposed driveway for the development is 39.7 feet pursuant to chapter 4 section each reduce that the driveway >> Just a quick income goes back to the conversation. We have a solid waste and kind of zoning about the refuse trucks going through there. Is there possibility for variance. Then with that due to the toughest always truck heading into that. The closure on the side there. >> A letter of technical deviation would be necessary You'll need to provide an engineer letter or sorry and engineering letter describing the situation in show how a large driveway would be as good or better than what city standards are our primary concerns would be walk ability and drainage because the driveway dropped. Her tends to be where water pools. If there's anything you can do to modify the design of the driveway or the curb to rectify that issue, that would help your case, OK? Number 2 vehicles, parking on the second floor, provide space for a vehicle to turn around all of the parking spaces are occupied. Subsection a provided turning temperature in how a passenger vehicle at the end of the aisles on both the second and first floors will maneuver to turn around to face the exit. I just notice the first floor also has said that and I'll do and I want to make sure that vehicles don't end up having to back out the way they can get in touch with you. Number 3 for 13th Street provide type F curb and gutter and met melt and resurface. The front of the curb. To that. The center line. Sorry to the center line adjacent to the subject. Property. The city code requirements, states surface of for concrete Shelby of uniform, texture, income action and shapes. So it's the dream without ponding water. The Finnish surface city as I'm not the V 8 more than 3. Sorry, one quarter of an inch. When tested with a 10 foot straight edge subject to no and resurface the westbound lane across the entire birth of the property. Frontage to create a smoothie, consistent travel way. So it currently shows in the plans as you guys. Like cutting out the areas around the utilities. Okay. We wanted to be like smoothie, consistent across the entire front of, you know, that that been re service recently. You're looking because the effect is a fake. The fact is ruined. The moment that you start cutting into the road to start putting all your utilities it's just a natural way to set the road settles All right. Number for sure. Pedestrian walkway from the stairwell to the public sidewalk. the WESTERWELLE has a direct. The rest. Their wells have direct connections to the public sidewalk. But the Easter will reprise that pedestrians walking along the side of the driveway entrance percent zoning code appendix a section. The 79 be one eye. Provide or strike path for residents exiting stairwell that won't put them in the way of vehicles entering the garage. If you guys have to, you can have like a sidewalk installed next to it. And that won't count towards your driveway. Okay. You know, because it's made out of another material or if it's trite such that people aren't supposed to use that, then we'll take that a sidewalk and not drive over. A figure that will help just that. Alright, number 5 for the sidewalk along the east edge of Tamiami Trail. Slash us. 41 at the intersection with 13th Street. The ADA ramps are oriented. Lee, which directs pedestrians using the ramp on to the outside lane of Tamiami Trail. Slice us. 41. Use ramp configuration. CR F and F dot standard plan's 5.22, that's sure to which will Henri and pedestrians using the ramp along Tamiami Trail Plus us 41 instead of into it, we're going to maintain this requirement because it is a significant issue that someone in a wheelchair may accidentally path into the trap away, which would be disastrous. And we're just rather have a proper a directional ADA ramp. If there isn't a day. Crosswalk going in both directions. If that makes sense. Okay. I know kind of that. It's kind of going to the next one as well. Redoing that the radius near the bottom out there, of the lot I know we've got a look some areas. The store things looks like throughout the entire. To me, for the Rams there or into that way and read redesigning redoing the entire radius to hold Robert Front. you know, extensive kind of beauty permitting removal one of structure that sort of thing. And is there any deviation from that? We can possibly get in or is a, you know, a little little excessive to redesign entire front of Tamiami trail or >> second verse. Same as the first. You're going to need to take a letter of deviation and you're going to have to provide evidence that this is not going to be a wrist to bet that student safety and at into walk ability and just for the free. The final comments as well. Number 6 decrease curb radius at the intersection of 13th Street and us 41 per EDC M Park 4 section the a E. Bike lanes counts. What's the effect of purple Brady? Us provide turning template as needed. Subsection 8% zoning Code Division, 9 section 4 under 3 B in order to maintain existing curb developer will need to submit a request for technical deviation from the EDC M. Such deviations must be based upon review of a detailed study prepared by professional engineer, which demonstrates why the technical the issues will result in a preferable environment or design impacts. All right. And DRC comments based upon new application materials. Number one bike racks are currently located on the second floor between 2 perpendicular parking spaces percent isn't appendix a section 17. 91. I sure help bicycles and their riders will enter and leave the bicycle parking area and parking spaces 30 31 are occupied by passenger vehicles. Relatively common issue I've seen in the city where what would use those extra spaces for parking for bicycle parking and then you'll have liked to. A passenger vehicles. Often trucks park in either of parking both of the spaces and suddenly there's no space to get out. They only need like 3 or 4 feet to squeeze into. you can probably Jimmy, parking space with us. And then finally advisory since the proposed development adjacent the Tamiami trail slash us. 41. Which is boulevard, which is FDOT right away to consult with FDOT for any permits and requirements for the proposed development. Subsection. A applicant is currently coordinating with FDOT for appropriate. See for treatments. It should be noted there that if Florida Department of Transportation has any input on those curbs. Then you can add that to engineering letter at the time you go to the Asian. All right. And that is all. All right. With that. We will be requiring additional submittal for this project. Yes, thank you. Thank you. >> Hi, everyone. Kevin Glands, development review plan or so. The second item on the agenda today is 26 SP 0, 7, Our North Trail, some 11 with the applicant come down and introduce the project. This is the 3rd smittle. >> Good morning. I'm Charlie Bailey with Twins, proper law firm. And I'm joined by happened on us of the RD Back before think this may be our 3rd DRC and I believe knock on wood. Our final So it's back before you the comment. >> Great. So again, Devin Gland development review began reading zoning in current planning requirements and regulations prior comments that remain unresolved. So it's I or sorry, 1, on sheet, 301. The less setback along Norwood court, as they mentioned, as but. 21.3 20 feet and the data table states. 21, the 4 inches or 21.3 feet and the site data table accordingly. >> Right? We But on that comment and the following comment, we'll have clean up those portions that plans. Yeah. >> Sounds good. And then just for the the second comment to is the man to the proposed south on the site plan on 2, 2, 3, 0, 1, And then. won the 3 signs have a area of 125.5 square feet at the 100 to 100 square feet for compliance and then to the strips. Located on the canopy are considered a canopy sign and must. And here to section. 7 Dash one, 10, one. 88 be too. >> Roger will also be claim is up in the plan. Set. Okay. Great. Thank you. >> A man under new comments based upon new materials. One pursuant to section 7 Dash 1, 0, 3, 6, all times may be eliminated, but all light sources shell be directed away from adjacent properties confirm compliance with this requirement. And 2 pursuant to Section 7 Dash 106, directional signs are dumped from permit requirements if they're than 2 square feet at the page, 30 footer reflect this code requirement. Do And then. The 4 preliminary drought one prior to issuance of the first building permit applicant whole a boundary just meant to reflect the subdivision of this parcel from the personal to the south and 2 grounds for every location of a conditional use may include but are not limited to the following. A change in intensity character beyond what was initially intended, which affects the public health safety and well for Saracens adoption of the conditional use or B, a new violations of the zone include including any conditions attached a conditional use. But the owner operator of the use. There's no mitigation comments. And then advisory. One. Do one is confirm whether the good neighbor plan was provided to the Neighbors Association is part of the second community workshop. And 2, it is recommended to provide further detail on loitering control, trespass and harassment and neighborhood communication. >> I you know, on both of those, we did note the lack of detail are some things that need to be fleshed out. And we're working with 7.11 to provide that information. So we would and for that reason because in my mind, pats mind the good neighbor plan was not yet Final 4. We have not yet mailed them to the neighbors. So as soon as we get that, that plan refined, we will conclude that with our next recent middle revised plans. addition to conveying them to our neighbors in the association. Okay. Thank you. >> Too. the time, a building permit such specific to mention sent elevations are required to confirm compliance with the city zoning code pursuant to Section 7 dash one, 10, 18 feet to volcanic the remark you signs provided assigned project more than 5 feet from building. Was not. area of all these signs shall not exceed 3 square feet of the area for each foot of the building fronted occupied by the business, displaying the signs 3 pursuant to section 2, dash, and identification. Sine is a sine that states the name of the business establishment, including the national local proprietor and or the address of the building. Therefore, if the logo includes a business name, the sign will be considered and identification sign rather than a directional sign. For pursuant to section 2. Dash, 201, an electronic message board is a type of side is off about take the graphic or symbolic informational content can be changed or altered on a fixed display screen composed of electrically up eliminated summons at the time. A building permit the signage on page 30 shall comply with electronic message board requirements in section 7 DOT one euro 3.18, and 5 additional comments may be forthcoming once more information is provided. Thanks. there is Recycling comments. Theresa Turner, Senior utilities engineer. >> Requirements and regulations. There's no the whole live redraft conditions. >> Walgreen. >> Site utility easement Shelby read the The Wall, Great site utilities and should be removed and the appropriate is not released. Documents show the record. It with us. Sarasota County and also with the city. See mitigation. There is no comments and advisory is just standard advisory. >> Base hit. I pulled copy. That is what we certainly would terminate that if the proper time meant to reflect the location of the new utilities. >> The abandonment that something we would prepare. These been documented with your >> The abandoned met. You can repay. >> Prepare now. I'm not sure there's going to be needed for cars. The existing fires are located within the right away. The fire hydrant. I don't believe we're going to need one. could really be that with respect knees and we a termination of that easement current currently with recording of an right? >> Okay. Yeah. Good morning, Jackie. Hurley City arborist. Comments based on new Materials. After recent site visit was clarified that no green trees are on the property. However, trees not qualify as green trees are forwarded to similar action under section 7, 3.28 states. It is the intent of this provision not to permit. Shell be granted for the removal of any tree where the applicant has failed to design. And located the proposed improvements to minimize is the removal of trees. Please explain why the design cannot accommodate the existing trees that are in moderate and or good condition alternatives such as rerouting sidewalks, water, maze, driveways and or transplant trees must be all considered. Number 2 on the tree inventory disposition table. She TD Dash one 3 of the east Palatka holly trees are that are in poor condition are showing us to remain. Please revise the plan, showing those removed and replaced with new plant material. And number 3 she L P dash one regarding the language under the plan scheduled treat tables. Where it refers to plant quantities and in cases of discrepancy, please explain those 2 sentences be advised that the landscape. Drawing and the plant schedule table must match. Understand. Yeah, I spoke Christie yesterday. I think I've got good feeling for feel for exactly what you're looking for. And with respect to a narrative as to those trees that don't. >> grants will include that in our OK? Thank Thank you. >> And then, of course, it more information may be forthcoming as new information is provided and then repeat under the advisory on the advise except for those trees that need to remove requirements under division. 3, one tree protection. None will be approved. Free Movil during the demo. >> Police Department, we have a Yeah. The dots thing department comments joining migrants building department. We have no comments and Sarasota County Fire Department. They have no Leslie stuck traffic and hundreds of comments. So we had no comments at the time that the DRC was a >> We don't have comments now, however, FDOT contacted us. They have further questions regarding the traffic study. And they're currently working directly with the consultant to make sure everything has satisfied. There are a few to that end. Engineering trafficking currency can't sign off yet, but we are ready to approve pending the final release of that traffic study. If there are any other issues that we can probably just sign off dependent proffers and we will hold a meeting with you guys directly as well as a consultant to see that everything's addressed. We just want to make sure that FDOT is OK with everything before we move forward. Sure. Understand. You have a sense for when that might be completed May. >> It shouldn't take more than a couple days. okay. Yeah. This is not going to hold you to like next DRC or anything. Okay. Great. Thank you. >> So on that note, we are issuing Herschel. Just for clarification. The next steps work with each individual, reveal word to a complete the remaining comments which I minor at this time. And so this does not mean approval or anything yet. You still need to go through the rest of the public hearing process. But we're just moving forward with First to Thank you. Thank you. Appreciate Number 3 on the agenda is a new submittal. 26 Ari and 0, 4, The Rose Point and the applicant come down introduce themselves. >> Hi, good morning, everyone. My name is Brian Lichterman and the president. vision planning and design. And I'm here representing Corey who is both the owner and the proposed developer. The 2.8 acre property located at 15. 51 north. But road we're proposing a rezoning from Rmf one to F 3, which is consistent with multifamily moderate density residential. And we're proposing a number. to move. 35. 36, I'm sorry. Multifamily >> Thank you. So 7 Glenn's development review planner. I will now be reading zoning in current planning comments. So we have no requirements and regulations pulling their preliminary, conditions or mitigation comments. But I will be reading a D advisory. So one resident, the residential, multiple family, 3 Arma 3 zone district is an implementing zone district in the multiple family. Moderate density future land use designation 2 if the rezoning request is approved by the City Commission, any future development on the parcel shall comply with the development standards for the arm Three-one District. 3 of applications for I resented that a site plan. The narrative of proposed schematic site development concept plan provided describe it more specific development time. Please consider providing proper language regarding the 36 unit count with into buildings. The 2, 3, a unit I mix proposed amenities and or the access point being restricted to the number road as described in these materials. For it is recommended to continue neighborhood engagement throughout the application process. 5% to table 6 dash 303. The minimum side yard setback requirement is 20 feet. The concept plan one side yard setback 15 feet. 6% to zoning code section 7, 3, 0, 4, 1, all off-street parking lots in excess of 1500 square feet or 5 spaces. Whichever is less. Shell have landscaping. That covers 10% of the total area of the parking lot of 5 foot minimum with type a buffer shall be required around the perimeter of the parking lot. The concepts that plan does not provide any landscaping when submitting the site plan application provide a landscaping plan complies with all that in code regulations and 7 additional comments may be forthcoming once more information is provided. Thank you. Thank you. And then for waste and recycling Just there's just one under requirements and regulations which is further solid waste comments, maybe forthcoming. Once a site plan submitted. 2 recent Turner, Senior Utilities engineer. Requirements and regulations. standard Priya. Informational. Was the comments since the site plan was not Just different. >> For mission. To go through. >> The preliminary draft conditions. It's more informational. Also. But the one the Rose Point development will need to obtain an agreement plan manner to connect to the water and wastewater services to the existing city, water and waste water mains located within. Manor property. The existing water main is 6 inch main. We don't do size on size connections. We also it's there is an easement utilities easement on the south side of your property that is for 30 inch transmission main that we have going through there. See mitigation. There's no comments. The they're standard advisory. Good morning, Jackie. Hurley City arborist. Number one. >> Divisions, 3, 1, section 7, the tree protection states no permit will be granted for trees if the applicant has not proven that the said tree removal, we solve global tree related codes. Number 2, 73 20 all non grand trees must meet the criteria for granting tree removal permits. Please design around the existing trees were possible when developing the site plan. And number 3, the submitted environmental report states that there are no green trees on site. Should a future survey or site visit determined that there are bringing trees on site. The provision. Section 7, 3.10, shall apply. more information, of course. With forthcoming new information. And under advisories. Several. Comments about landscaping and such. >> users of what's at this time. We on the desk department the comments at this time. Good morning, routes and building department to we have no issues with the rezone. We did provide advisory comments. And Sarasota County Fire Marshal's Office. They have issues with the rezoning and they did provide advisory comments as well. All right, Leslie, thank you. Traffic Concurrency comments. >> Most of these are just standard they come with every application sent to the traffic and currency. So number one, Sarasota County maintains neighbor Road and 17th Street right away, coordinate with the county on matters of road reconstruction, curb repair and maintenance of traffic as well as any changes to cross section of the road. Number 2 per figure. 26 rode his bicycle lane per dcm part for K 2. A bike lane is the find of the portion of the road that has been designated by striping signing and or pavement markings for the preferential or exclusive use of bicycles, basically just maintain what's there? Number driveways must be the standard. Concrete driveways. 4% of transportation chapter action started 2.2 sides, driveways, no wider than necessary to accommodate the design vehicle, solid waste trucks may pull into the opposite lane order to complete the time preferred maximum driveway with its 20 feet. Number 5. And Lou of Thermoplastic are painted crosswalk. Markings across dry play. The developer may elect to install paper bricks on the pedestrian path across driveways. If they do, they must match or exceed the details with the polling requirements. And then there's a list of requirements. Percent is owning code appendix a section 79, a 1, 3, Any required bicycle racks within 100 feet of the main entrance. I guess all standard thank you very much. >> And for the record the health of engineering, there is no comments, but there may be coming forth Let's savor. Visions are provided and Sarasota County School has no comments. So on that we will be issuing partial sign off. You have any questions now. >> Thank you very much. Appreciate that. You know. >> 4th item on the agenda is a Newsom. Middle. 26 S P 11, which is sure Armand. Well, the applicant please come down and introduce themselves in the project. And we've gotten much. >> Good morning on the Purdue, a planner with Kimley-horn. So we're here on behalf of Kaufman short properties to discuss the new shore restaurant on Saint Armands Circle the proposed project is redevelopment of 2 existing commercial buildings and we'll be unifying those into a 3 story. Mixed use development featuring ground floor, retail cafe, a restaurant on the second floor one residential dwelling unit on the 3rd floor. So thank you. >> Thank you. So Devon Glance, Development review planner again all began with reading the zoning in current planning comments. requirements and regulations. One provide further detail narrative on the foot conscious design measures and the proposed blood panels to please clarify these proposed on level 3 of the narrative states. There is one unit shown on 104. The space is generally labeled as residential area but appears to be divided into individual units with some legal. That's sweet label the rooms of the 4 plan accordingly to confirm these are not individual units. Section 2, dash, 201, to find a towing. It has a new building or portion thereof designed the pride are intended for occupancy has a complete independent living facility for the exclusive use of one family, including permanent full provisions for sleeping eating cooking and sanitation. A dwelling unit will have no more than one primary kitchen until provide complete internal access to all rooms in the unit buildings with more than one set of cooking facilities are considered to contain multiple dwelling Us the additional cooking facilities are clearly incidental and accessories such as an outdoor grill or accessory kitchen. And it touched room without complete Internet access to all rooms in the units will be permitted permitted when the room is clearly and so dental and accessories such as pulled utility room. Please confirm what uses and structures are proposed from the rooftop deck and provide further detail the replanted this labeled. And I mentioned for the safety table in 2 to one states. The proposed development standards based on TV zoning section. 6 dash, 1, 0, 0, 5, please correct. To reflect the subject. Property is zoned commercial tour. A CT in the development standards for Ctr in Table. 6 Dash 5, 0, 3, 8, Clear, 5 clearly label to on the site plan. This is a corner lot of 2 front and 2 sides have box. Please update decided to table accordingly. Pursuant to Section 6 Dash 5, 0, force you one new awnings Kennedys. My keys and similar features may not encroach into the public right away. Along the front property line. Please clarify what is new versus existing little the property lines elevations and Dimension. 7 pursuant to Section 6 Dash 5, 0, 42 new awnings canopy. Some similar features were a will be constructed of high quality materials, pasta cooking the have a coffee or shiny The parents are prohibited of awnings, canopies. And so my features is prohibited. Please come from the materials for the retractable awning plan. Turnover need to confirm compliance. Provide impervious surface coverage in calculations to confirm compliance. pursuant to Section 6 Dash 9, 0, 70, the maximum of 5 for parcels located in the CG Zone District and on the islands is 35 feet as measured from the minimum elevation, the minimum theme elevation allows up to a maximum of 4 feet of free board. Section 2, dash, 201, defines free as an additional amount of pie. But the base flood elevation used as a factor safety in determining the elevation to which structures, the lowest floor are the lowest towards onto structural, a member of the lows for as a must be elevated or flood proof as required by the Florida building code and by the zoning code. The elevations indicate the optional Ford feet of floor but of free board is being utilized for height. However, it does not appear. This is where the lowest floor is located. Please revise. 10, the site data table in 2 to one states that the maximum allowable building height is 35 stories update to 35 feet in accordance with city Zoning Code Table. 6 Dash 503, a and section 6 dash 9, 0, 7, 8, Section 7 dash 2.13, see one loading zone is required for the proposed development labeled the loading space on the site plan and other required and proposed loading space to the site data table. Well, city staff are conducting further research other spaces and the city's parking garage can be utilized for this project. If this is and viable, an off-site parking agreement will be required if it is not additional parking spaces will be required. 13. The parking calculations on streets. You one state of the net commercial space increases 2,264 Square Feet when conducting the proposed minus existing calculations, the total square footage is. 1904. Please update the parking cut. The nation's accordingly. 14. They mentioned the retractable awning on to a 106 confirm whether it is a new or existing awning and 15 label and they in the low 3 and all of the elevations. There are no preliminary and rough conditions are mitigation comments and for deep advisory. One, the plans reference try flood proofing out the ground floor, which is allowable for non residential portions of mixed use buildings. The project will need to demonstrate that the proposed approach me to political requirements of the city's floodplain management ordinance. And it is 24 for a drive. Flood proved construction. These requirements include dry flood proofing certification of a means of egress located above the flood proofing level waterproofing in see page details and calculations utility and backflow protection and preparation of flood operations plan. Any ground for areas not propose for drive slippery thing. We'll need to comply with the applicable portions of city ordinance and it is 24 for areas below the design. But all of a sudden these items are typically just during building permit review. It is recommended to provide a breakdown of what use is the limit spaces are designated for. 3. Consider utilizing often a building that flooding standards and zoning code. Section 6, dash 503, to you. Pursuant to Section 6 503, K display areas are not permitted and required landscape parking or pedestrian areas. 5% to table 6 dash 5, 0, 3, 8, the display of merchandise on doors open to the outside is prohibited 6 pursuant to Section 6 Dash 503, K 3 display areas for plants and produce are limited to an area equal to 15% of the principal. It uses gross floor area except for approved plant nurseries, all plant and produce. Merchandise must be stored inside the building up to permit hours of operation confirmed complained to provide calculations as relevant and the rest are just. Standard comments. Thank you. Thank you. On behalf of the waste and recycling comments, there's just 2 requirements and regulations. So one, please update number. He ate reflect that your trash dumpster as provided in the waste collection narrative and 2, please update to number see it with the proposed 2 yarder cycling dumpster along with staging location in truck turning to. But even though the stumps there will be serviced by an outside vendor. Turner, Senior Utilities engineer. Requirements and regulations. One demolition and removal of existing. >> Large royal Palms along Madison Drive cannot commence until the existing 12 inch water main. Has been relocated. Ten-foot minimum of the property line and the existing 12 inch. Casey water main has been abandoned in place. And prop Phil. Too. The civil landscaping and architectural plans mestre be revised to reflect the most current record drawings, existing utilities along Madison Drive at 28 North Boulevard. Of the presidents consist only of. A 12 inch PVC water main and a 12 inch asbestos cement water main. The 12 Inch KC Water main is located within the grass landscape very along. Madison Drive and conflicts with the pres propose landscaping, demolition and construction. Just a quick question on this So I know we have to existing 12 inch means with in Madison. Are those both active? >> So if the one that was to be removed within the landscaped area where they where they need to be replaced with an additional 12 inch. It would we have several 16 inch means connecting into it. >> originally there was a plan to put in a 16 and replace. that didn't happen. It was confusing our record drawings so we might have misguided. You. But after further investigation that it was determined that the planned 16 inch connection was never put in we can. This is a summer plans. is why we are where today? No just want to clarify 3, the civil utility plans depict an existing 6 sea water main run in parallel to the 16 inch ductile iron high water main within the service drive the 6 inch water main has been grout filled and abandoned. And must be shown as such on the plans. For the civil and landscape. Landscaping and architectural planned show clearly identified the existing 2 inch galvanize water service that originates from Madison Drive and extends along south along North Boulevard of the presidents. A quick question on that one as Would you be able to provide a larger? >> served for that area just because in the section that we received it, you don't know where it's coming from. just have a on the plan, but that might help to determine provide record drawings we have on that. it's been there a long time. So it's unclear how long it is and where it but it looks we should be able to locate where it Thank you. A 5. The proposed master potable water meter and backflow preventer. Shell be installed within a dedicated meter room, equipped with double garage doors and located over the service lines. >> This configuration is required to provide adequate access for the city utility, staffed, conduct, maintenance and repair activities on the service lines leading into the master meter. On the plans. It looks like there's just no door there. >> And yeah, as of now, there are located outside of the due to some space contains, but we can it looked like there was a wall. I think if there's no wall, there is no, don't look like there was possibly going to be a wall there, the where the plans was drawn as part of town. So there's no wall that it doesn't. You know you could it. >> Ice 6. >> The proposed city utility easement Shelby wider than 9.5 foot to accommodate the safe operation maintenance so that stick and fire assemblies. Then again, we thought it was a brand of there was a room there, too. I can take a look at that. 7. The size of the proposed master meters shall be shown on the next planned submittal 8. And or utility We have for bridge to replace the existing know. A 9 utility notes shall be submitted. So be numbered. 10, the propose fire Department connection show not be installed within the right of way. 11, the existing wastewater service shall be cleaned and videotape from the waste water clean up to the main. >> A heavy duty clean out ring and cover shall be installed to protect the connection. >> The to clean out. 12. The utility demand form should be completed in full by the project engineer, including the fire flow information. 13 architect architectural in landscaping plans must be revised to align with the updated simple plans. The preliminary draft conditions. There's no comments seeing mitigation, one. There's no comments the Pfizer ease. There's a standard advisory comments. Thank you. Thank you. >> Good morning, Heart of the for 2 comments. The first one. The proposed require right away. Use permit. And number 2, section 7, 3.69 permit is required to remove transplant are really low key trees and more information may be forthcoming as new information this time. >> But ask users and pleas from 7 to step to Pfizer comes Good morning, Brent. U.S.. Many department, we do have a few requirements, regulations and then one comment. I'm old. >> The audience because of that to you as well. So when that's not noted is a agreement approved by the City Commission would be required for these parking in addition to an off-site parking agreement would be required and more edition will be forthcoming with that. And number 2, the purchase of parking spaces in the Saint Armands Parking Garage and District is not allowed. It would be in violation of the parking bind, parking payment in the form of a lease would be the only potential option. Thank Good morning, Barbara. It's building apartment requirements and regulations item one. All plans must show compliance with the 2023 edition of the Florida Building code. >> A condition for building plumbing, mechanical fuel gas twenty-twenty Edition, National Electrical code. 25 edition of the Florida Administrative Code and the 8 edition of the Florida Fire Prevention Code or the code that has infected the time of application. And I did provide some advisory comments for as well. In addition at Sarasota County Fire Department, they have no additional comments. Thank you. Stuckey transportation also be speaking behalf of with engineering. >> For trafficking, comments, number one per transportation chapter figure TDs 7 months and drive is designated bicycle lane per the multimodal connections Plan. Madison Drive. Its potential shared lane. Provide And then under advisory, further comments may be pending the outcome. The traffic study that should be finished with in life 15 days, probably less, though. I'd have to check the exact dates of it, but it's on its Number 2, since the proposed development is directly since the proposed development directly. Access is SR 7.89 Boulevard of the presidents which is an F dot right away. And so with FDOT for any requirements for proposed development, subsection, a consult the Florida green but table 3 dash. 25 for minimum distance required between for parking on Boulevard of the Presidents. And the intersection with Mats and drive. Number 3, her multimodal connections plan. That's our 7.89 boulevard of the presidents is a bus And finally, number 4. Per the transportation chapter figure T one 3rd player. There are a fair plan. Boulevard yards is a minor arterial. Like I said, those are advisory so they don't really. Are you? And now for engineering comments. Number one, there is an existing storm North Pole, part of the president's near west end of the existing parallel parking spaces that is noted to be, protected in GT 4. However, the site plan sheet c 6 and the sidewalks and curbing that appears to conflict with existing storm structure. Please clarify. So. >> Our intent is just to maintain the existing crosswalk in just a kind of update the edge of the sidewalk on either side, we won't be proposing any new in your sidewalk within the alley. So that should not impact the existing structure understood. >> And number 2, the separation distance of 20 feet is required between the sidewalk on maps and afternoon to the nearest propose parking space since the alley is one way and the direction of Madison Avenue and go the proposed parking spaces accordingly and away from the direction of this crosswalk. The study just discourage people from like trying drive up the wrong way at the alley and then get a parking spot right? >> I know that there are some existing do not enter signs as well with that kind of help to mitigate just to the spacing floor. Would you also like to see those parking spaces? >> This was discussed internally with engineering. We would like to see the parking space angled as that is more of a fiscal the compared to signs which can't be ignored drivers. Well. Preliminary slashed rough conditions, the pedestrian zone shall be free and clear of intrusion or obstructions. Always such as architectural features, ball caps, handrail street lights, low voltage lightings. She keypads or other person says. And then there is a long long list of advisory will go for them. Real quick. Number one, please note that the 2024 Ucm has an effective date of October. First 2027 permit applications that are received is complete on or after that, they must comply with the 2024 ucm. 2 applicants may choose to implement the 2020 for ABC Em prior to the effective date. However, it must be applied consistently across all disciplines. So that only one it is for the entire project. As a note so far, we have been reviewing this accordance with the existing ATC M. So if you change that, the comments might change. The applicant understands about string, the ability to meet storm water requirements. They are moving forward at their own risk. With the signing construction in compliance with part 6 of engineering design criteria manual. The project me Concurrency for storm water and will not result in that adopted level of service. You guys are really increasing or decreasing the amount of impervious pavement out there. So you wouldn't expect to see very much of anything. Want to know that any sort of studies and matter it's dressed continue. And he said. Number 6 show existing traffic control signs on the plans. Number 7. The city requires a separate of a minimum of 4 inches of concrete at 3,000 Ps I for paper break. That is to be installed within the right away. This must be depicted in the plan. Details. The gradient of the driveway. Shelby, not more than 10% or less than 4% for the first 5. His sidewalk. It should be noted that you have sidewalk or driveway in this particular case. But the IDs still sort of applies to your parking Now you have to after a nudge toward the center of the 9 provide transitional traffic. I said even there. Just a standard, Wesley, I All right. Yeah. Comments to not required for DRC sign up at our prior to building permit. >> Okay. Fair enough. literally copy paste that all okay. And only 11, 8 half of them just because they don't know is my again, it did. Thank >> And then on behalf of Sarasota, Sarasota County Schools. There's just one advisory comment which is a letter of exemption has been issued for this project. If there are no changes in residential units, Sarasota County School, it has further comments. On that note, we'll be recording in middle. You have any questions. Thank you. Thank you. ? So next is the projects that have received full sign up and there are none. And then do we have any stock discussion? Seeing none. We will adjourn this meeting. Thank you.

Development Review Committee

DEVELOPMENT REVIEW COMMITTEE

Alison Christie, AICP, General Manager, Development Services

08:30 a.m. July 15, 2026

Notice of Meeting

I.

DEVELOPMENT APPLICATIONS

1.

25-SP-13 (Second Submittal) 1312 North Tamiami Trail: Application requesting Site Plan approval to redevelop the ±0.40-acre site, demolishing the existing building and associated infrastructure to construct an 11,040 square-foot mixed-use building with structured parking, general office space, and 8 residential units. The site is zoned North Trail (NT) and is located within the North Trail Overlay District (NTOD). The property has a Future Land Use designation of Urban Mixed-Use. Access is proposed from 13th Street. No attainable units are proposed with this project. (Camden Jenkins, Development Review Planner, Development Services)

Click Here to View Application Materials

Click Here to View Staff Comments

2.

26-SP-07, 26-CU-01, 26-MCU-03 (Third Submittal) North Trail 7-Eleven (3535 North Trail): Application requesting Site Plan with a Major Conditional Use and Minor Conditional Use approval to demolish an existing one-story ±14,270 square-foot commercial building and construct a one-story ±4,852 square-foot retail store, motor vehicle fueling station consisting of 10 fueling stations and associated canopy on an approximately ±1.56-acre site that is zoned North Trail (NT) with a Future Land Use designation of Urban Mixed-Use. The proposed fueling stations require minor conditional use approval, and the proposed 24-hour operation requires major conditional use approval. A total of 29 parking spaces are proposed. Vehicular access is proposed from three access points, one along Myrtle Street, one along N. Tamiami Trail, and one along Norwood Court. (Devynn Glanz, Development Review Planner, Development Services)

Click Here to View Application Materials

Click Here to View Staff Comments

3.

26-REN-04 (New Submittal) The Rose Pointe (1551 N. Beneva Road): Application requesting a Rezone Without a Site Plan to rezone ±2.8 acres. The site is currently zoned Residential Multiple Family 1 (RMF-1). The Applicant is proposing to rezone the subject property from RMF-1 to Residential Multiple Family 3 (RMF-3). The subject property has a Future Land Use designation of Multiple Family (Moderate Density). The RMF-3 zone district is an implementing zone district for the Multiple Family (Moderate Density) Future Land Use designation. (Devynn Glanz, Development Review Planner, Development Services)

Click Here to View Application Materials

Click Here to View Staff Comments

4.

26-SP-11 (New Submittal) Shore Restaurant St. Armands (28 & 24 N. Boulevard of the Presidents): Application requesting Site Plan approval to renovate an existing 2-story ±14,020 square-foot commercial building and demolish an existing 2-story ±5,087 square-foot commercial building to construct a 3-story mixed-use building that consists of ±8,463 square feet of restaurant area, ±1,820 square feet for a café, ±7,023 square feet of retail, and one dwelling unit on an approximately ±0.33-acre site that is zoned Commercial Tourist (CT) with a Future Land Use designation of Metropolitan/Regional #7. A total of 8 parking spaces are required, and an additional eight are proposed to potentially be purchased from the St. Armands public parking garage. Vehicular access is proposed via a private roadway connected to Madison Drive. (Devynn Glanz, Development Review Planner, Development Services)

Click Here to View Staff Comments

Click Here to View Staff Comments

II.

PROJECTS THAT HAVE RECEIVED FULL SIGN-OFF

1.

The following project(s) that previously received partial sign-off have now received full sign-off:

III.

STAFF DISCUSSION

1.

Pending Building Permits and Projects Under Construction

Notice to Public

Showing the first 24,000 of 57,089 characters. The full document is at the source.

brief overview of the project. >> Morning for the record, my name is the care came with card. Now. >> Tony left lot of with their engineering. spent on general contractor. is a kind of people view the This will be our second review for the year C basically the the process can be a 4 building well as a part of department by parking second parking and some residential units residential and space. Well, commercial Well, that project. Perfect. Thank you very much. All right. So for the record, I'm Kevin city planner with staff. >> And here are the zoning comments for today. First up, are the requirements and regulations that remain unresolved. One. Update the site data table to include the required versus proposed development standards of the North Trail. And North Trump overlay district outlined in Table 6, 5, 0, 3, in Section 6, 9.10, including required versus proposed density high, etcetera. Some columns are left with not applicable for Valley is as today's meeting, please provide the projects proposed height in stories in the zoning data section consistent with and Todd Standards update the maximum height in the North Trail Zone district. 35 feet consistent with table 6, 5, 0, 3, a 3. Too per Section 6, 9, 10 to 3 day, an 8 foot pedestrian space with a 6.5 foot amenity spaces required along the north time. Trump frontage the amenity space must also include canopy. Trees were achievable. Please revised the plans to include the required amenity space. As of this meeting, police to mention the required a manatee zone on the plans to determine compliance pursuant to Section 6, 9, 10 D 3, a manatee zone is required to be minimum of 6.5 feet. And with it any point fronting North Tamiami trail, I understand there was to average out the 6.5 feet. And if you want to meet later to discuss that, I'd be happy to do so. But the standard is the talking. For a 3 sections, 6, 9.10, TC 4 requires frontage is a lot North trail to provide minimum death of 20 feet for projects utilizing the and Todd, please revise the plans to remove the parking from this layer and dimension 20 be available space for the full length and height of the first story of the building. Please note that the stairwells elevators lobbies and other associated building service space may be allowed to contribute up to 20%. 20% of the available space requirement. This will need to be revised based on the available space requirement was said about as of today's meeting, please to mention the 20 foot bubble space depth on the first floor of the plans to determine compliance and relocate those 2 parking spaces to comply with the 20 foot depth of habitable space requirement. For a 4 section 6, 9, 10, D 3 C 3 requires at least one main entrance of a commercial or mixed use building to face the sidewalk along North Trail or the corner of North Tamiami trail. And the about extreme entrances, Shelby emphasize with landscaping, lighting and or recessed from the Passat. The provided entrance appears more secondary as an access is the stairwell. Please provides to provide the main entrance. As of today's clarify how the entrances emphasized pursuant to Section 6, 9, 10, D 3 C 3. We saw the change was made just some more clarity on that front. But the. >> So I just have a quick question with regards to that So I I just want to clarify that there are ways for us to sort of emphasize that main entrance as the comment notes through things like landscaping and signage. But that that is not actually required to access a commercial portion of the actual development itself. So if it is accessing some sort of like a without be sufficient to satisfy the comment for the entrance along North Tamiami trail. >> I believe so. It could be some time to review that. No such a Thank you. All right. For number 5, a 5 rather, please provide further information regarding how refuse recycling pickup will be achieved. Well, the truck have to back into the public right of way after loading or as of today, State zoning Code section 7 to 13 D does not allow trucks to back out into the right of way. Please revise. Number 6 per section 6, 9, 0, 9.10, D C 6. Please provide the location of any mechanical equipment and detail as to how it will be screened. Is any mechanical equipment proposed on the road today. He just much on the 5 on there. So and down to tonight as well on their So we have some pretty in-depth conversation. Design with solid waste. >> And I showing was fixable with there. But the truck back up right away on out. So is is there. The comic con of is is 5, 9, are comical misconduct. Each other is present player. Dion on what you're looking for and that is more design. Okay to the truck moving in there. That sort of thing that kind of seem to go. and then little little putting on there. >> Understood. per per the zoning >> the the backing in backing out is not allowed. And we we want to acknowledge that you have these conversations with solid waste and that they were cool with what you have proposed. At the end of the day, we still need to see turning temple in the plan set. So if that could be provided, that would be great. I can also get you more clarity on that. I am today as well. So it was first turning so backing out will not be allowed. Just just. >> Or can apologize. And again, on that are we able to apply for some sort of an adjustment to allow for solid waste collection has proposed? >> I have to look into that >> for number 6, a as of today's meeting to mention the height of all items about the roof to determine compliance with Section 6, 1, of 2 people. For a 7 further clarification as required regarding how the project meets the parking minimums. The project narrative states that 11,040 square feet commercial and residential units are proposed. Well, the site data table shows a total of 10,152 Square feet of commercial use based on the project narrative. 39.5 running up to 40 parking spaces are required to be in compliance with Section 6, 9, 10 to 9. We've had plenty of extensive conversations between the Very something officials and case over. So there's been a little more clarity on so for today's meeting, the update to that is pursuant to Section 7 to 13, a 2 loading spaces required for developments that can take between 10,000 to 50,000 Square feet of floor area. Update the site data table and plans to reflect the incorporation of one require own. That means the requirements of section 7 to 13 B, 3 G and included turning let so in reference to 5, 9 as well. Just that turned Please provide additional information regarding the proposed monument sign on the corner of North Tamiami Trail and 13th Street to show compliance with Section 6, 9, 10, 10, please confirm the heightened proposed site area for the money that sign. We understand that it's not the intention of the applicants provide the monument sign at this time in this case, just remove it >> For a 9 per section 7 to 13. The trucks cannot back into the street. And as you mentioned, this is a similar comment to 5. >> So he was owning acknowledges solid waste, revealed the plan to back out of the living space. The turning still require for review to understand the maneuver. A time. Per section 7, 2, 0, 3.11, parking garage and shot the screen with material of no less than 50% of city and expenses longer than 25 feet or higher than 3.5 feet. So the architecturally designed, please provide greater detail on the building elevations to show compliance with this requirement. We did see that there was a an attempt to communicate that on the televisions for today's meeting. Our noble be identify how expanse is longer than 25 feet or higher than 3, 1, half architecturally examples given vertical or horizontal changes and while playing landscape race planters decorative you port. Sorry, Grill work or decorative masonry patterns and dimension. The architecturally designed expenses on the plans. We just want to see some clarity on the site plans for how the structure parking screen with materials of no less than 50% capacity. Whether that's just providing a percentage list of materials so on and so forth. That should resolve that issue. And as for the DRC for this number one, provide elevations for all 4 sides of the proposed building include the total height as measured from finished floor to finish feeling number 2, pursuant to Section 6, 9, 10 3 B, clarify how the development provides architectural treatment that emphasizes the >> didn't have a quick question on as well. So I believe our plans currently a tower structure or return it on that And as we reviewed the coded, it seem that that would be an acceptable option for the city. Is that something that could satisfy that requirement? Yeah. Just make sure to provide in morning Yeah. >> For number 3, pursuant to Section 6, 9, 10 to 7 provide a pedestrian circulation system that complies with the requirements of Section 6, 9, one. 33 and label on site. Plan. And for number 4 to mention the setback on the east from the staircase and update in the site data table. >> So just a quick question of that. Just a clarification on the record set back for that side. There. Are you able to provide some clarity as far as what the setback is for the area there? >> Yeah, for Can you remind me what? And that's that. >> He's yet to sign. Yeah. So there's of what we found out in the code. Is there The property is a residential property, Howard's own commercially. So from our stating the setback, choose their own aside. That's where Jason to commercial property. >> I can take a look at in a second. Absolutely. Provide that for you for me. Make a little note on my computer here as well for that one. Moving on to be one for the preliminary and traffic conditions. This one is just staying on here. So we remember to incorporate it into the staff report see, there are no requested or required for this one. And for advisory, what the long-term bike parking appears to be located inside of the retail store. Please consider relocating the long term by the parking to a place that's more accessible to potential residents. Provide an updated that lists the names and contact information for all desired points. Contact for this application. Anyone not listed under the will not receive project related communications staff. We understand that there was. A long process to get here. We just want to make sure that we know who to contact the first time. >> Thank you. We are working on updating those materials and we'll have them to shortly. And just to go back to the preliminary draft conditions. I just wanted to confirm the point of contact for that. So should I work with you or the city attorney's office on that agreement or who would be the best to contact appeal for e-mail the the point of contact. >> And when that's all done, make sure to fill out the proper attorney, all that Perfect. Thank you very much. And then as an additional at the end of June, I sent out a an extension form for documents on up to sign. It has yet to be Tried to reach out a couple times if you could try to get him to not the side of the much. Appreciate Thank you. Of course. And then for solid waste and recycling. They have no further comments. They seem to be resolved in the communication that the referenced. To reset her or utilities and engineer. We have on the requirements and regulations. >> For new DRC comments. One demolition plan. She'll show existing agents gravity, Maine gravity wastewater main manholes in the existing 6 inches. Wastewater service shall be kept at the main. The manholes Shelby barricaded in clearly protected during the motion. To possible lot of service and the irrigation service backflow preventer shall be placed immediately after the water meters. >> is it just that to these been look like the on that one? >> Yeah. Okay. If it's in the easement it just we just don't want it too much between the meter, OK? No problem. A the size of the pros. Derek proposed irrigation meters shall be shown on the next plan. Some middle per. >> City of Sarasota, Utilities, Department. Standard details the for the existing 3 Sea water main located in the right away beneath the proposed improvements she'll be placed with replaced with an 8 PVC Dr. 18 water main or it may. And at the end, doctor, all because if it's in the road, are we're being told Cip is now putting and act all and they want us to stress ductile just the replacement Miss Turner. Some point. I think we'd like to schedule a follow-up meeting with your office to discuss >> but I just wanted to clarify. So would for the existing 3 inch water main be sufficient to serve the needs of the development as proposed in a requesting that we up size essentially this water main. >> We need to get 3 see out of out of your construction and out of driveway. it is our policy to upgrade when things are improved, there's an 8 inch that was installed on. I believe that stepped out on the south side of the project. it is our. It is per our That we upgrade. As far as the flow for your project. I'm not sure that would be, you know, your engineer had Alex, but is it when we replace when we asked someone to replace a line we go our minimum size, which is a for commercial. >> Yes. We could potentially schedule a I think that would be helpful. Thank you. 5. The fire line back foot backflow preventer should be moved inside the property. 6. The proposed wastewater Service line show runs straight. >> And then it goes into a 45 into the lie. That's just for clarity on the fans 7. And Ft. DOH permit may be required by the state. Number 8, 8, 8, Thank you utility to demand shall be updated with the most current. I believe the one submitted was older one. The preliminary draft conditions. There is none. There is no medication. it is just the standard advisory. Good morning. Checking her, at least in the >> Comments that remain unresolved street off site trees with tree protection areas that overlap with in the propose word area. Let's be shown on the site plan. show the cypress trees off site on the property to the north on the site plan. They must be properly identified and shown with proper tree protection. And then a new comments based on a new information. Number one, it is the intent of this provision that no tree shall be granted for removal. Any tree where the applicant has failed to design and locate the proposed improvements to minimize removal Tuesday. During the recent site visit, it was mentioned that the 3 black olive trees on the property could potentially be retained. If those trees cannot be retained, police justify the removals as per the city code requires. And number 2, a type a buffer must be continue was in the continuous row and may not contain any development. Impervious surfaces. site features that do not function to meet the standards of section 7, 303, device, a landscape plan to correct it interrupted buffers adjacent to the neighboring residential properties. >> Just a quick question about when they're on that just the other side of the west side of air, there's so you do is request an easement along that pretty much are some of the property. So are we allowed install the required giving within that utility easement? >> What you said on the West side, sorry, these sites are you said yes on the size asked the question again, these on the east side, the properties, the >> commercial zone proper, the residential structure there >> the utility partners Asus a grand even along that side there because there's 6 you long go through there. Are we are you asking us to install the latest giving within easement utility easement or >> how to be site? It has to be on site. >> You know, have conversation or even meet on site that you just think about the engineering and I can be included. >> Personally, I the intent of the landscaping was to move it out of >> It's just that the code says it has to erupted. Okay. Are okay. Number 3, the 16 inch tree located in the northwest corner of the property has been misidentified. The trees black, all of a not a lower low. Please revise and number 4, the on the existing trees table, please indicate that the 2 Sable Palms are being retained. And like I said, we can meet on site. >> Possible should. Thank Makar just users his car. We have new homes at this time. We many departments have no comments, a warning by Brits building department. We have no comments. And in addition, Sarasota County Fire Department has no comment Stuckey trafficking currency comments. So prior the years, the comments that remain unresolved number one percent transportation action strategy. 2.2 sides, driveways, no wider than necessary to accommodate designed vehicle solid waste. Trucks may pull into the opposite lane to complete the term preferred maximum driveway with this 20 feet. Subsection a per ease him figure St 11 the driveway with his measured at the property line and shall not exceed 24 feet for multifamily residences. The proposed driveway for the development is 39.7 feet pursuant to chapter 4 section each reduce that the driveway >> Just a quick income goes back to the conversation. We have a solid waste and kind of zoning about the refuse trucks going through there. Is there possibility for variance. Then with that due to the toughest always truck heading into that. The closure on the side there. >> A letter of technical deviation would be necessary You'll need to provide an engineer letter or sorry and engineering letter describing the situation in show how a large driveway would be as good or better than what city standards are our primary concerns would be walk ability and drainage because the driveway dropped. Her tends to be where water pools. If there's anything you can do to modify the design of the driveway or the curb to rectify that issue, that would help your case, OK? Number 2 vehicles, parking on the second floor, provide space for a vehicle to turn around all of the parking spaces are occupied. Subsection a provided turning temperature in how a passenger vehicle at the end of the aisles on both the second and first floors will maneuver to turn around to face the exit. I just notice the first floor also has said that and I'll do and I want to make sure that vehicles don't end up having to back out the way they can get in touch with you. Number 3 for 13th Street provide type F curb and gutter and met melt and resurface. The front of the curb. To that. The center line. Sorry to the center line adjacent to the subject. Property. The city code requirements, states surface of for concrete Shelby of uniform, texture, income action and shapes. So it's the dream without ponding water. The Finnish surface city as I'm not the V 8 more than 3. Sorry, one quarter of an inch. When tested with a 10 foot straight edge subject to no and resurface the westbound lane across the entire birth of the property. Frontage to create a smoothie, consistent travel way. So it currently shows in the plans as you guys. Like cutting out the areas around the utilities. Okay. We wanted to be like smoothie, consistent across the entire front of, you know, that that been re service recently. You're looking because the effect is a fake. The fact is ruined. The moment that you start cutting into the road to start putting all your utilities it's just a natural way to set the road settles All right. Number for sure. Pedestrian walkway from the stairwell to the public sidewalk. the WESTERWELLE has a direct. The rest. Their wells have direct connections to the public sidewalk. But the Easter will reprise that pedestrians walking along the side of the driveway entrance percent zoning code appendix a section. The 79 be one eye. Provide or strike path for residents exiting stairwell that won't put them in the way of vehicles entering the garage. If you guys have to, you can have like a sidewalk installed next to it. And that won't count towards your driveway. Okay. You know, because it's made out of another material or if it's trite such that people aren't supposed to use that, then we'll take that a sidewalk and not drive over. A figure that will help just that. Alright, number 5 for the sidewalk along the east edge of Tamiami Trail. Slash us. 41 at the intersection with 13th Street. The ADA ramps are oriented. Lee, which directs pedestrians using the ramp on to the outside lane of Tamiami Trail. Slice us. 41. Use ramp configuration. CR F and F dot standard plan's 5.22, that's sure to which will Henri and pedestrians using the ramp along Tamiami Trail Plus us 41 instead of into it, we're going to maintain this requirement because it is a significant issue that someone in a wheelchair may accidentally path into the trap away, which would be disastrous. And we're just rather have a proper a directional ADA ramp. If there isn't a day. Crosswalk going in both directions. If that makes sense. Okay. I know kind of that. It's kind of going to the next one as well. Redoing that the radius near the bottom out there, of the lot I know we've got a look some areas. The store things looks like throughout the entire. To me, for the Rams there or into that way and read redesigning redoing the entire radius to hold Robert Front. you know, extensive kind of beauty permitting removal one of structure that sort of thing. And is there any deviation from that? We can possibly get in or is a, you know, a little little excessive to redesign entire front of Tamiami trail or >> second verse. Same as the first. You're going to need to take a letter of deviation and you're going to have to provide evidence that this is not going to be a wrist to bet that student safety and at into walk ability and just for the free. The final comments as well. Number 6 decrease curb radius at the intersection of 13th Street and us 41 per EDC M Park 4 section the a E. Bike lanes counts. What's the effect of purple Brady? Us provide turning template as needed. Subsection 8% zoning Code Division, 9 section 4 under 3 B in order to maintain existing curb developer will need to submit a request for technical deviation from the EDC M. Such deviations must be based upon review of a detailed study prepared by professional engineer, which demonstrates why the technical the issues will result in a preferable environment or design impacts. All right. And DRC comments based upon new application materials. Number one bike racks are currently located on the second floor between 2 perpendicular parking spaces percent isn't appendix a section 17. 91. I sure help bicycles and their riders will enter and leave the bicycle parking area and parking spaces 30 31 are occupied by passenger vehicles. Relatively common issue I've seen in the city where what would use those extra spaces for parking for bicycle parking and then you'll have liked to. A passenger vehicles. Often trucks park in either of parking both of the spaces and suddenly there's no space to get out. They only need like 3 or 4 feet to squeeze into. you can probably Jimmy, parking space with us. And then finally advisory since the proposed development adjacent the Tamiami trail slash us. 41. Which is boulevard, which is FDOT right away to consult with FDOT for any permits and requirements for the proposed development. Subsection. A applicant is currently coordinating with FDOT for appropriate. See for treatments. It should be noted there that if Florida Department of Transportation has any input on those curbs. Then you can add that to engineering letter at the time you go to the Asian. All right. And that is all. All right. With that. We will be requiring additional submittal for this project. Yes, thank you. Thank you. >> Hi, everyone. Kevin Glands, development review plan or so. The second item on the agenda today is 26 SP 0, 7, Our North Trail, some 11 with the applicant come down and introduce the project. This is the 3rd smittle. >> Good morning. I'm Charlie Bailey with Twins, proper law firm. And I'm joined b

All meeting actions

Source coverage incomplete

5 meeting items captured. The published sources do not prove this is the complete docket.

Showing 5 of 5

Browse by category5 actions
  • Agenda item 1Land use

    LOPMENT APPLICATIONS

    Department: DEVELOPMENT APPLICATIONS · Topics: roads, traffic safety, land use · Staff lead: Camden Jenkins, Development Review Planner

  • Agenda item 2Land use

    k Here to View Staff Comments

    Department: DEVELOPMENT APPLICATIONS · Topics: roads, traffic safety, land use · Staff lead: Devynn Glanz, Development Review Planner

  • Agenda item 3Land use

    ls

    Department: DEVELOPMENT APPLICATIONS · Topics: roads, land use · Staff lead: Devynn Glanz, Development Review Planner

  • Agenda item 4Land use

    ion Materials

    Department: DEVELOPMENT APPLICATIONS · Topics: coastal resilience, traffic safety, land use · Staff lead: Devynn Glanz, Development Review Planner

  • Agenda item IIOther meeting items

    e to View Staff Comments

    Department: PROJECTS THAT HAVE RECEIVED FULL SIGN-OFF

Official record

ArtifactSourceState
Agenda packetNot published in the sources we holdunavailable
Budget documentNot published in the sources we holdunavailable
Action agendaNot published in the sources we holdunavailable
MinutesNot published in the sources we holdunavailable
Transcript or captionsSource recordingread transcript
AttachmentNot published in the sources we holdunavailable

Coverage and corrections

Records considered

  • Development Review Committee
  • Development Review Committee — Closed Captions

Not claimed by this page

  • A source-grounded next meeting date
  • Official outcomes have not been published.
  • The available transcript has no reliable timestamps.
  • Transcript coverage is partial.
  • Speakers have not been reliably matched to public profiles.
  • Named people and places have not been reliably resolved.
  • An individual roll-call roster is not available.
  • Low-grade, ungraded, procedural, or superseded items remain in the complete agenda inventory rather than the meeting digest.

No source correction or revision history is recorded for this meeting. A corrected artifact will appear here as a new version rather than replacing what is shown above.

Canonical record: a713cc530dbadb5de3f8331bedb353f2. This page changes as stronger artifacts are published; it never overwrites an agenda with minutes.

Publisher tools

Share or embed this record

POLISCOPE publisher tools

Share or embed this record