POLISCOPE
Back to bills

The civic record

Read. Follow. Verify.
Enacted

Connecticut Regulates Data Brokers, Surveillance Pricing, Genetic Testing, and Streaming Ad Volumes

Original title: AN ACT CONCERNING CONSUMER PRIVACY AND PROTECTION.

Last action · May 27, 2026: Signed by the GovernorSponsors: Martin Looney and 59 others

Introduced
Committee
Floor Vote
Passed
Law

Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.

What This Bill Does

Connecticut enacts comprehensive consumer protection legislation requiring data brokers to register and participate in a centralized deletion mechanism, restricting personalized algorithmic pricing and , establishing genetic testing safeguards, and prohibiting loud commercial advertisements on streaming video services.

Why it matters

Residents gain new legal rights to delete personal data held by data brokers, opt out of precise geolocation tracking, control genetic testing samples, receive explicit disclosures when personal data influences online pricing, and be protected from excessive commercial audio volumes on streaming platforms.

Background
  • The Connecticut General Assembly considers legislation each session to strengthen consumer data privacy rights and regulate emerging commercial technologies. context
  • The Connecticut Data Privacy Act provides the foundational statutory framework governing consumer rights, personal data processing, and controller obligations within the state. context

Who It Affects

Groups the bill's text affects, as described in the record. Being affected is not a position for or against it.

Directly affected

Consumers

Consumers gain new rights to request data deletion, control genetic samples, receive pricing transparency disclosures, and opt out of precise geolocation tracking.

Directly affected

Data brokers

Data brokers must register annually, pay a $2,500 fee, check state deletion mechanisms every 45 days, and undergo triennial independent compliance audits.

Directly affected

Retail sellers

Retail sellers are prohibited from engaging in surveillance pricing and must provide clear disclosures when personal data is used for automated price setting.

Directly affected

Direct-to-consumer genetic testing companies

Genetic testing companies must obtain explicit consumer consent before retaining biological samples or sharing genetic data, and are barred from sharing data with insurers or employers.

Directly affected

Streaming video service providers

Streaming video providers must comply with volume limits on commercial advertisements to prevent ads from playing louder than video content.

Key Facts

You don't have to trust us. Each fact below is taken straight from the official document - click any one to see the exact passage, highlighted in the original.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is an accessible deletion mechanism?
It is a centralized state online program established by the Commissioner of Consumer Protection that allows consumers to submit a single request to have participating registered data brokers delete their personal data.
Are financial institutions and credit agencies covered by the data broker rules?
No, entities regulated under the Fair Credit Reporting Act, Title V of the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act, and certain state-regulated financial institutions are exempt from the data broker and provisions.
How will online pricing be affected by this act?
Businesses using automated price-setting devices based on personal data for online transactions must display a prominent notice stating that the price was increased by a price-setting device using the consumer's personal data.
Can genetic testing companies share my DNA data with my employer or insurance company?
No, direct-to-consumer genetic testing companies are strictly prohibited from disclosing a consumer's genetic data to employers, life insurance, health insurance, or long-term care insurance providers.

What else do you want to know?

News Coverage

No news coverage found yet. Articles are indexed twice daily.

Where This Stands

Current status: Signed into law.

Procedural history

37 actions
  1. May 27, 2026Governor of ConnecticutEnrolled
    Signed by the Governor
  2. May 15, 2026Governor of Connecticut
    Transmitted by Secretary of the State to Governor
  3. May 15, 2026Connecticut General Assembly
    Transmitted to the Secretary of State
  4. May 14, 2026Connecticut General AssemblyEnrolled
    Public Act 26-64
  5. May 4, 2026Connecticut General Assembly
    In Concurrence
  6. May 4, 2026HouseFloor
    House Passed as Amended by Senate Amendment Schedule A
Show 31 earlier actions
  1. May 4, 2026HouseFloor
    House Adopted Senate Amendment Schedule A
  2. Apr 23, 2026House
    House Calendar Number 492
  3. Apr 23, 2026House
    Favorable Report, Tabled for the Calendar, House
  4. Apr 23, 2026House
    Rules Suspended, Transmitted to the House
  5. Apr 23, 2026SenateFloor
    Senate Passed as Amended by Senate Amendment Schedule A
  6. Apr 23, 2026SenateFloor
    Senate Adopted Senate Amendment Schedule A 4531
  7. Apr 20, 2026Senate
    Favorable Report, Tabled for the Calendar, Senate
  8. Apr 20, 2026Connecticut General Assembly
    No New File by Committee on Appropriations
  9. Apr 17, 2026Connecticut General Assembly
    Reported Out of Legislative Commissioners' Office
  10. Apr 17, 2026Connecticut General Assembly
    Filed with Legislative Commissioners' Office
  11. Apr 17, 2026Connecticut General Assembly
    Joint Favorable
  12. Apr 15, 2026Connecticut General Assembly
    Immediate Transmittal
  13. Apr 15, 2026Senate
    Referred by Senate to Committee on Appropriations
  14. Apr 13, 2026Senate
    Favorable Report, Tabled for the Calendar, Senate
  15. Apr 13, 2026Connecticut General Assembly
    No New File by Committee on Judiciary
  16. Apr 13, 2026Connecticut General Assembly
    Reported Out of Legislative Commissioners' Office
  17. Apr 13, 2026Connecticut General Assembly
    Filed with Legislative Commissioners' Office
  18. Apr 10, 2026Connecticut General Assembly
    Joint Favorable
  19. Apr 8, 2026Connecticut General Assembly
    Immediate Transmittal to Committee on Judiciary
  20. Apr 1, 2026Connecticut General Assembly
    File Number 285
  21. Apr 1, 2026Senate
    Senate Calendar Number 196
  22. Apr 1, 2026Senate
    Favorable Report, Tabled for the Calendar, Senate
  23. Apr 1, 2026Connecticut General Assembly
    Reported Out of Legislative Commissioners' Office
  24. Mar 26, 2026Connecticut General Assembly
    Referred to Office of Legislative Research and Office of Fiscal Analysis 03/31/26 5:00 PM
  25. Mar 17, 2026Connecticut General Assembly
    Filed with Legislative Commissioners' Office
  26. Mar 16, 2026Connecticut General Assembly
    Joint Favorable Substitute
  27. Feb 27, 2026Connecticut General Assembly
    Public Hearing 03/04
  28. Feb 26, 2026Connecticut General AssemblyCommittee
    Referred to Joint Committee on General Law
  29. Feb 25, 2026Connecticut General Assembly
    Drafted by Committee
  30. Feb 11, 2026Connecticut General Assembly
    Vote to Draft
  31. Feb 4, 2026Connecticut General AssemblyCommittee
    Referred to Joint Committee on General Law

Version history

Only one version on file - nothing to compare yet. As later stages (committee substitute, engrossed, enrolled) are captured, the redline appears here.

View official text →

Lobbying Activity

No state lobbying filings in our records match this bill. Federal lobbying reports (LDA) cover Congress, so they are not listed on state bills.

Full breakdown

Who this bill affects and the strongest case for and against it, written only from the bill’s own text.

Sponsors

Show 55 more sponsors
Rep. Gregory Haddad, 54th Dist.CosponsorNo profile match

Discoveries

2 patterns noticed across the record

Patterns POLISCOPE noticed across the record. These are observations to investigate, not conclusions.

policy shift99% confidence

Establishment of Centralized Data Deletion

Connecticut creates a state-run accessible deletion mechanism, requiring data brokers to periodically check and delete consumer records across platforms.

financial connection95% confidence

Dedicated Registration Account Funding

Fees collected from data broker registrations and deletion mechanism access are channeled into a dedicated nonlapsing account to fund program administration.

Connected Entities

Department of Consumer Protection, Attorney General, Commercial Advertisement Loudness Mitigation Act and 4 more
OrganizationDepartment of Consumer Protection“Responsible for registering data brokers and establishing the accessible deletio”Map →
OrganizationAttorney General“Enforces violations of the act as unfair or deceptive trade practices”Map →
otherCommercial Advertisement Loudness Mitigation Act“Federal law used as a standard for regulating streaming video commercial audio v”Map →
otherHealth Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996“Federal law referenced for health information privacy standards”Map →
otherFair Credit Reporting Act“Federal law providing exemptions for certain consumer reporting agencies”Map →
otherGramm-Leach-Bliley Act“Federal law providing exemptions for financial institutions under Title V”Map →
PersonCommissioner of Consumer Protection“Tasked with administering data broker registrations, deletion mechanisms, and ad”Map →

Sources

Analysis Score

0–100
  • Significance90
    How much this matters to a regular citizen
  • Controversy65
    Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
  • Entertainment10
    Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
  • Buzz75
    Current news / social attention level

Publisher tools

Share or embed this record

POLISCOPE publisher tools

Share or embed this record