Code Compliance Hearings

>> All right. We're going to go on record for code compliance. Special magistrate hearings. Today's date is 8/20/2026 first case on the docket today is a city of Sarasota versus the D and K Cirrus LLC. >> case number 2026, 0, 0, 5, 3, 0, And gentlemen, I think some 8 and your name, Sir, Gunnery. It's your E was the last time. >> The other P tu vs. >> All right, sir. And sir, your name again. Please deck lever DEC K he's the ER. Okay. Very good job in. All right. Thank you. >> You were here before us. I know. You know, the procedure always start with the city of Sarasota, Mr. Spence's in today for the city settled well on the city's position. And I'll come right back to get your Mr. Spence, whenever you're ready themselves, this is actually a new case for a violation of our Florida building code. One of 5.1 permits for. >> Wired. There is an interior innovation that was done without a permit. I am please report. We do have an after the fact permit issued as of May 22nd, but we do not have any inspections called in yet. So I defer Mr. De Clever Mr. My thought is that Putin out and relation to time from when they get the inspections called in. All Who wants to respond here in terms of the getting the inspections going with the situation that we when we get job hired now we have to all our inspection first >> he's plumber. do the inspection wasn't licensed in the city? He was when the city will have to get pump the plumber. He was there on Tuesday. It spends the House and we pass everything. And now he U.S. report and we're in the Trump glow to the city in schedules. A final inspection for the next week. This is a plant. Alright, consistent with the understands, OK, went on final part of looking to push us out 30 to 45 days along and work through that process and everything shop. So if I just put it >> finalize this. Maybe 30, 45 days out. You'll be they could be ready to go even though we should be ready next to I hope return next close to 30. Then it sounds like they're confident their about their so. >> And if we final close the permit earlier, do have to come to hear a sudden you come back. We have the issue, fines and costs. And I like to hear from the city and the responded on that issue year. That will push us out to September 24th or worse. Every gentleman. Yes. And you understand time 8.30, work surface. All right. All continue out this case out the 9/24/2026 at 08:30AM. Why the violation 105, 0.1 continue at this point. >> Jim, we'll see you then. Doubling or app it up when you come back. OK, thank you. Thank you very much for time. A good day. >> Lows Maryland Weisenberg. >> Yeah. 5 white art. I I'm just parking. You want me to come I didn't know you're coming to the hearing in >> We'll continue right. We had schedule appear by telephone to come on and we'll go ahead and wait for you, OK? >> Come on here that what did you Come on, come on in for your hearing. >> Come on. And is part yet? Parking? Come in. >> man is be there in 5 minutes. I'll be in. >> Very good. Thank you. We're gonna go on record for city of Sarasota versus but Patricia Basher case number 2025, 0, 0, 3, 5, 3, for the record. There must be cement stipulation of this. >> Yes, your Walker and can. So reached out saying that there is a death in the family and they wish for a 60 day continuance and the city was perfectly fine with that. We're going to push it out to October. 29 at 09:00AM. >> I will cut it out. October 29th at 09:00AM. And take us off the record on on this case is record of this 2025, 0, 0, 3, 5, 3, >> morning. Good morning, Good. I'm good. Thank you. >> Well, first of all, we want to apologize because we don't have enough knowledge. all of is the first time understand. >> OK, let's work our way through this, OK? So we're going to get on the record here. On the record for city of Sarasota vs Orlando Rodriguez. Perez is case number 2026, 0, 0, 5, 8, 0, And for the record, sir, your name, please. >> Our land of the biggest. >> All right. our Rodriguez is with us. And ma'am, your name? >> I it Garcia. the first time R l pt Weiss. Garcia's lasting. >> And you're here mostly is because interpreter in a kind of the know his girlfriend? Okay. Here's ago. Okay. That's got that's good. All right. Procedures that we start with the City of Sarasota sell. Start with Mr. Spence and then I'll come right back to the 2 of you, OK? So Mr. Spence, whenever you're ready things all us. This is a new case for 2 violations. First one being. >> City code. Section 16 Dash 50 for an operable are unlicensed vehicles that was corrected with our inspection back on April, 25th of 2026. And then the final one being Florida building code 105, 0.1 per month. >> Where there's a fence that was installed without a permit. Please report that as our inspection of August, 11th, the property is now fully in compliance. >> OK, so do you heard Mr? Spence, he indicated the violations were corrected to August. 11th for 1, 0, 5, 1, in 16, 50 for April. 25th with their inspection, guess year agreement with that. I will let me just fine for the record than that Florida building Code section 105, 0.1 was correct. In 8/11/2026, 16, 50 the city code was corrected 4/25/2026. So at this point, go to the issue, fines and costs, Mr. Spence, the city have a recommendation on this issue. >> What are your honor? We do have a potential civil find that accrued from April 24th of 2026 to August 10 to 26 for 109 days at $100 a day bringing the potential civil fine $10,900 with 3 inspections of $390. This is not going to asking for any of that civil fine tune. The their response definitely were pretty tentative. Get everything taken care once they became aware. But we would like to recoup the city's cost $390 of the taxpayers bear the burden of this process. All right. Do you understand, Mr. Spence recommendation of potential fine was 10,900, but they're not asking for any fine, but they are asking for costs for this process of 3 90's. >> That worked for the 2 of you. Okay. Let's go with that. And I will impose a fine and just cost of 3.90, nothing of a Kate in this case. Listen. Have a good day. Thank you for coming to a patient. Thank you. Thank you. All right. Thank you. Thank you. Bye. wait. Yes, you have a question. >> Sure. So this is closed. The cases that were the case close. Yeah, you you can. If you want figure out how to take care that the cost of the things can tell you the back out to do OK, thank Appreciate Thank you. >> All right. We're on record for kids. Case of City of Sarasota vs. >> Daniel Weisenberg Russell Weisenberg, Maryland Weisenberg and this is case number 2026, 0, 0, 0, 5, 3, and for the record, I believe we have Maryland Weisenberg correct. Okay. I was was Berg procedure always start with the city's officer with Mr. Spence and well in the city's position on this. And then I'll come right back to get your position. Okay, Mr. Spence, whatever your race or tell us, this is a continue case. We have for a violation of our Florida building code. One of 5.1. >> Permits required where there's multiple structures and work them without a permit. We do have an after the fact permit applied for. But there is some comments that need to be answered through the building department. According to our notes, it looks like the application is missing plans for the outdoor kitchen pergola shed and second carport. And so the so as we're ready to get her contractor involved to have those plans drawn up and added to. The existing plans already there with their trans middle. But I'll defer to her relation to where that stands. And when get those turned in. All right. was for you. If I understand what meant to there. >> I did. And I got the letter just yesterday from the city. So I was able to read to that and >> called them and they said to make an appointment down there to go down and resolve each one. Some of these make sense. Some of them don't Bs for some letters on gas and all this. I don't even have gas. then several other things. But yes, that is exactly where we're at. I'm just requests I'm snow. Birds like keep flying in for these meetings. But I just wonder if I can have a time to my telephone interviews. You okay when we can do that because I what I will do is one by one. I'm going to try to get with the city, go through these one by one. Get the things that they need exactly like things like the hot tub. I called my heart to come. they said never in Sarasota. Have we ever got permit? So they said, I don't know if they're so I think there's a couple things on here that the city will just say, OK, forget this, but there are some things that are valid. So I'll get with the city and then we can do another one and hopefully we can do that over the phone. So I don't have to come back again. You could divide fact. I had my doctor to appear by telephone to. >> You did. What about you must fill out some paperwork for that. So you can certainly do that. So many have about. I mean, I I think this was going to take another 4 to 6 weeks trying to get all these letters. So I'm thinking if we can push this back till then, all right. Maybe pushed out 45 days. You have it it is. Couple that lot of work to the process is obviously the review process is going to take some time, but it's all after the fact. So once. >> Firms issue, that progress that would push us to October 8th. Okay, let's do that. That would be great. >> And what I know to do early morning that 30 think time is nice. Yes, do that are as All promise work on these one by one and get them resolved and players. >> Great. Thank you. Yeah, we'll continue that. 10/8/2026 08:30AM, find a violation continuing one 5.1. And this was good luck with us. We'll see you then. Thank you. Take care. All right. We're going to go on record for city of Sarasota versus Georgia, Peru, Arevalo coach Rusty, the Georgian. Yeah. Arevalo revocable trusts. And this is case number 2026, 0, 0, 5, 1, 4, And sir, your name, your George RR of OK, you've been here before seen. I know. You know, the process will all start with Mr. Spence for the city today. Come right back Mr. Spence, whenever you're ready. And just results. This new case for for violations, first of which is secret section 16 Dash 47. >> The commission just rubbish and trash next to stand or housing code 307, 0.4, which is where care premise us and the final 2, which are 30 dash, 17 30 Dash 10, which pertain to doing work within the city's right of way. >> Without a permit, we do have a, you know, permit applied for. But there is some pending corrections that were sent out back in March of this year. >> So those who need to be answered prior you know, and being issued as well as we do see some good progress being made on the trash where there's still some just scattered items that we need to be collected up. So defer to Mister of and relation when he thinking everything taken care of and we can move forward. I let me go to you at this point get your response. You. >> Yeah. So as far as any any overgrowth, anything like that? That's all been completely handle completing care of because drive-by today take a look and look pristine as far as the driveway situation. We're currently still on that. So we're working on the permits. There was a switch. So might the tenant that lives on the property. He's of paper contracted vs Beat. You know, can I do this? that parents find on to come that your body? That's really fun. But I didn't know. I wasn't aware that, you know, that require a permit. And so he was aware as well, at least in because you worked in the county that apparently apparently they're required. And so on. We applied for the permit he's working with the GC right now to try get this issue resolved. I was actually on the phone to just little bit ago. And so they're making progress. It's really up to the city right now because it's the between the back and forth between the GC in the city. And so that's kind of where we're at right now. Okay. So hopefully it uses providing information they're requesting. That's correct. He should be. Any questions, Mr. Spence. >> Not this You know, as of right now, we don't see transmittal. So make sure that there is any channels and replaced in their head that you see of the city, as you mentioned. And you mentioned your tenant is, you know, the paper contractor and all that. We did see some papers are displaced around. I was asking anything of that nature stored properly that way. No one views trashes are driving by just. Eliminate any confusion zone as looks like you guys admission, good progress. Just anything that can be stored properly away. Just asked to do that. So with that said we're probably looking to push us out 30 to 45 days. Get some progress update from that point, which would put us right around October. 1st, what that? There's the time. >> And you do mornings or afternoons morning We relegated you May. 31, let's all do our country. The case out 10/1/2026 at 08:30AM, for the violations. Continuing is cited. >> At this point and so we'll see you then. Thank you. Appreciate thank you. All right. We'll go on record for city of Sarasota versus Stafford Springs just after the 3rd Wayne in Stafford case number 2026, 0, 0, 8, 3, 9, for the record. No one's here on behalf of the respondents. So Mr. Spence cities, the position on this case, there are cells. This is a new case for a violation of our city code. Section 16 Dash 50. >> For another war on license vehicles on the property. As of right now, as you can see on the screen, the property SOS remains out of compliance with the vehicle still being in disrepair. flat tires. I was hoping that someone to be in attendance today speaking on behalf of where things stand and where where vehicle removed or possibly repaired. With that said, we do have a affidavit created by the inspector. With an initial inspection of April 10 to 2026. Notice Melt on April 14th. Notice Survival 20 via Certified Mail compliance that complies with set for April. 21st, the 2026 of the proper main out of compliance and civil fine currently running from April 22nd of 2026 to August 19th for 120 days $100 a day bringing the civil fine to be $12,000.3. inspections of 3.90, from a into that. And as exhibit number one, as well as exhibits to 3, 4, for notice that hearing, oh, come on, Mitt 1, 2, 3, 4, And based on the affidavit fighters ongoing violations, 16, 50 the city code impose a >> civil fine to date of $12,000. Costa de of 3.90, will be imposed as well. Also $100 per day daily running find to a violation is corrected on the cape. The respondents are required to attend the next hearing and what's are available time. Yes. >> are looking at. September 17th one, 15. All right. Into the case up to September, 17th at one 15 pm. >> And that'll take us off the record. The record for a city of Sarasota versus Carlos. You can see it's case number 2026, 0, 0, 5, 0, 0, for the record, mister. he's not Sir. Your name, please. My name's Gary sour Iran. There. >> Say you ER as they you are. All right. procedure, Mr. Sour into it. Technically you're not the responded to Davis. Yancey is, but you're you're here that will help him. Probably. >> So we'll start with the city manager, Mister Spence out. Come right back to you. OK, Mr. Spence, whenever you're ready. >> There are cells. This is a new case for 3 violations. First one as Florida building code one of from Why or where? There are some windows citing inflation do a permanent police. Part of that one corrected with our inspection of August 14. Next is a violation of the Florida building code. One of 5.1 permits require where there's a fence. Those down without a permit. Don't we do not see any fence application permit applications. And as of our inspection this week and then finally is standard housing code violation 3, a 7.4 for care premises where there was a discarded jet ski and the front yard. We do see some progress and that is it was cut up and placed in the back of the pickup Looks at appears that will be removed that we would still consider that a compliance until it is officially removed from the property. But I would imagine that's going to be relatively quick to fix, but I'll defer to Mr. Sour of when you think get that removed as well as have Mister Yancey apply for that fence permit. Alright, so go to you. Now. It done. might regret now fixing to go to a dumpster. >> you know, it was a room use Roddick decider, building. So I'm moving side of the road. I had to go to the hospital. I had grow on now. Do I manage to lose? So now I'm getting back up. Moving around. And since then we cleaned all. had somebody to clean it for me and it. >> So you see all these can be left to be done. chance is going to have to well that permit. I would assume so. The year he talked to about it for the fence. >> We talked at one time a long time ago that I thought it. >> I don't know what you had nothing to do with offense. He's that he did. know. I don't have Is. Yes is on as we get the you might pass along to him. There's is fence issue going on in risk. code enforcement cases going on. So he knows got he's the really want us exposed. You're financially because his name is on the the respondent. You're not so you may want to pass that along to him. So you're doing what you can to help them out. I you had done everything as far as my just for the record on this one. A one oath. 5.1 is applies. The windows siding if they should is I understand correct August 14th, the fence installed out of permit is continuing one of 5.1. And your 7.4 is the jet skis. Almost. It's continuing technically, but you're right on top of that. So all right. Let's figure got time to bring the case back in. Yes, we're looking at Thursday, September 24th. >> At 8.30. During the case back the September 24th at 8.30. Okay. noticed by me? So do September 24th at 08:30AM. >> And so we'll see. You are and hopefully miss. You can see here that on that day, you might pass along the fence issue to him. >> Okay. Yeah. That's why there are. Thank Thanks for coming to appreciate it. Thank you. Thank you. >> I will go on record for city of Sarasota versus Queen. Major case number 2026, 0, 0, 0, 8, 0, no one's here behalf of Queen majors. So whats the city's position on this case. >> Things are so is this is a continued case. You had for a violation, numerous violations of standard and say building in code 3, 1.4 and I am pleased to report that with our inspection July 29th, the property is now in compliance with the demolition of the property. >> I will find that all the violations are have been corrected as of July. 29th is cited in the case. >> Because to the issue, fines and costs, I know there's a big find its recruiting this. What I believe there. >> Yes, your honor. We do have me after created by the inspector. An assessment today of $17,600. And then a continuation of that civil fine from May. 15th, the 2026 to July. 28% 5 days. 100 $1 a day during that portion, the $7,500 and creating a new civil fine to be $25,100 with 5 assessed Costa date of 1300, $5. 2 additional 150 as and that during that portion out of the $1455. And then we had a city authorize demo of $9,442. And $0.69 bring in the new cost inspections to be $10,897.69. And if I may answer that in his exhibit, number 3, as well as exhibits number 4 from Eisenman Construction incorporated for the demolition of the property. admit 3, 4, And you asked me impose the fines. As for correct. >> So go ahead. And big move a kit. The prior orders. To unify this into and pose a civil fine to get hosed. 25,100 for the fine in total cost appear to be $10,897 and $0.69, which I'll impose. And are corrected. So that will close this case. All right. Way to go next to City of Sarasota versus Jennifer. it or lick got COVID could be accurate. All right. OK, is case number 2026, 0, 0, 3, 6, 7, And you Jennifer. He could a cave are very good night procedurally. You haven't been here before. So all this is we start with the City of Sarasota with Mr. Spence today, then I'll come right back to get your response. Mr. Spence, whatever your race or >> tell This is a continuous you had for 2 violations, both of which are violations of our Florida building code. One of 5.1 permits required. First one is for an renovation that was done without a permit. And then the final one is for a fence that was installed without a permit. We do see some applications turned in the interior renovation. One had some comments that were sent out on August. 3rd and then the fence had some comments that were sent down on July 17. So just need some answers to those comments before the permit. Can progress. So the or like you're back in relation to ensure they get those comments turned So the king of the permits moving forward. Okay. Maybe I'll go to you and get your response there. >> Okay. So I did hire a contracting company that specializes after the fact permitting. So I am. Staying up to date with them. So the last that I knew that the fence was the last thing in regard that they that you were asking questions for. And I did submit that about 2 weeks ago. I submitted them Now I was here. I didn't know the hearing was rescheduled for today. So when I came 2 weeks ago, I didn't get that from. The other building here. And then I submitted it to you. It is 4 PT permits. there contracting company that I'm working >> our inspection this week, we're not seeing any trans mills from them better than turned in turn it to your contractor. But they haven't officially turned into the city yet. So makes you stay on them to ensure that they're progressing. Forges week ago, said we're comments for the fence permit that were sent out on July 17th and we haven't received anything anything since then as well. As for the interior and a vision. We had comments and out on August 3rd and there is no comment sent from direct. >> Okay. I they did send me this to bring in which is a signed and sealed plans by a licensed professional. They get it up to compliance. I don't know if you would like them. >> reason more so for the across the street and second floor for the building department that way, you can turn that into that we hopefully maybe that's all the answers that they'll have for these permits. We could move forward from there. >> Okay. I appreciate >> All right. Well, let's let's just find a new date and bring the case back to let you work yourself through the process or with your contractor. And yeah, okay. >> At their mercy. >> understand we're looking at a little past 30 days, just getting status update from there which could push us to October. 1st of that works. >> Sure. G do it always on Thursday. Always a Thursday. Yes. Okay. Whatever day's best. >> And the earliest time have on October. First is 10. 45 that we have a pretty open afternoon if that works best for you. >> 25 okay. >> That's well look into the case out to October. First 2026 10:45AM. for the violations continuing 105. Both violations want to 5.1. all right. Well, hopefully you can get with them, can get push them along to get there. Applications in would wrap it up when you come back. I agree, OK? Thank Have a good day. Take care. Thank you. Have most with. Thank Thank you. All right. We're going to go to City of Sarasota versus Steven, Robert Rasmussen, memory of Kristina Rasmussen and the last name change somewhere down the line. The loss of case number 2026, 0, 0, 5, 7, 3, So for the record, your name for the record, please. Barbara brings. And I'm a relative. Okay. got it. All right. That's it. brings I'm gonna start with the Start with the suspense out. Come right. Back to the suspension are you ready? I think we're so say we have the 2 violations of our star. Florida our standard housing Cohen a 1.6. >> For standing as well as defense. It's in disrepair. Please report that the standing was corrected with our inspection on August. 18th. And so you expect or it appears that the offense is to be removed in the coming weeks. So ask spring break is in relation to what she thinks timeframe of being removed. Okay. Judge Briggs way. Would he want to go in this one? >> Got to come into a tree. Our bureau died of my brothers out of town. So I have to get a dumpster. So I think 30 days is that the longest to know 30 days fine because it got it. >> What we have, Mister, we just have to remove all that. Part and just leave the chain. >> we are looking pushes to roughly September 24th. Okay. Always a Thursday morning or afternoon. Better for you. Early. Probably the earliest we have beautiful Dhaka is 10:00AM. that works? All right. So do it can out to 10:00AM. September 24th find a violation of one once 0.6, the the Stn or how the code continuing the well, it's 1, 6, of the state has a code was correct. In 8/18/2026 and so I guess we'll see you then. Correct. Now very good. What's good to after all? It's bill. It's been how many years they've been out since you've been out of the about 2020 20 years working at the Glen D, though I haven't seen you. Were you working on? where it's far residents our research. >> Director City of Sarasota versus on T town Bill is at Good Witch Incorporated. This case number 2023, 0, 0, 8, 5, 1, And for the record, no one's here on behalf of responded. But it's just up to the affidavit Signet Center. >> That's correct. Term with this to violations of city code. First one, 16 Dash 4, 7, and 16 dash. 49 see which back in 2020 had us maintain or 3 until property changes hands. We had go out twice and the recent months due to non-compliance, we have an affidavit that was updated. We assessed find a date of $65,500 assess inspections to date of $1685 with one additional inspection of $75 as well as a >> trash removal of $90. Each bring in the new SoFi are New inspection cost the $1940. >> If I'm a into the exhibit number 12 as well as 13 14 for the other 2 will on the noises. >> OK, I'll admit those at exhibits into evidence and looks like find a new correction date with us is working 8/11/2026 both violations and pose total civil fine 6 65,500 bucks. $1940 in costs. And I guess that will take us off the record. And I would say would like us to make monitor him all city authority to maintain the premises. Okay. go next to city of Sarasota versus Webster and just a few Duran Webster, it's case number 2026, 0, 0, 4, 2, 4, to identify yourself for the record here. My name is Joseph. You know that in Webster. All right. This I haven't seen, you quite well. Hi. How are you doing, Elaine? very good. As you know, I we start with the city start with miss Mr. Spence today and come right back to suspense. Whenever you're ready. >> tell us this is a new case for a number of violations. First one is city Code Section 16 Dash. 47 the commission Junk rubbish and trash. Now does have a correction date of August 18. Next one is 16 dash. 49 be for have a dense rank overgrowth develop property. Next well as starting housing code violation 3 of 5.7 which pertains to windows in disrepair. then there's 305 3.1 305, 3.2, which both pertain to a roof that is in disrepair, portions of the roof that are in disrepair we have Florida building code. One of 5.1 permits required were there was an addition that was done to home without a permit and finally have center housing code. One, a 1.6, which is a violation for. The offense that is in disrepair, all of those storm and out of compliance as our inspection this week, we do not see any for the addition as well. As for the roof or offense in disrepair as well as we have the over of that is still in the rear of the property so that the Duran Webster, Malaysian to when she thinks you get these violations corrected as well as just get the ball rolling on a permit to permit these additions and repairs. OK, go to you. >> The wind, though, repair >> that rise with that. Clean it up to. >> We need to fix the you know, the roof, part of weekend, and that. And we just need more time to >> Okay. So have a contractor lined up to do the worker with the story there. >> So today somebody is coming. Coming up. There's C okay. >> All right. all right. Well, that Mr. Spence, you have any questions of Mister Webster. Not particularly. We just need to see some progress, you know, on the roof as well as the permits. >> You know, for the addition as well as the roof repair. And then if she decides to, you remove the fence or had the repair, make sure that, you know, get in touch with her inspector to, you make those notations and that can update our case source. You know, part of pushes out about 30 45 days to a lot of work through this process. >> Okay. When we push up 45 and you but you're going get a contractor on board right away and get this moving. Okay? >> because something just to fix the fence. Was It was one part of it Going need improvement for >> You know, permit for your fence of it needs to it was. A ratings fall. >> You know, it's not something new. >> I'm >> need a permit as it was. just need the bar. one means just one board. that's totally fine. You know, zones are keep in the same fences exactly. So just the bar that was that should be an issue. But once I get started, just get in touch with the inspector so they can is no data that's been corrected and then we can move forward from there. Oh, that's important. Things that you said Ms pushes about 45 days to allow Mr. Neurosurgeon worked in the >> process and that will push us to October. 15th. And you for mornings or afternoons. Warning. fun and and see then. We were 10, 15. >> All right. We'll do a content out to October 15th at 10, 15 find violations continue as outlined by Mr. Spence, the 47 was corrected. And we will see you then. Thank you. >> So toddler team there are 15 to 10:15AM. >> do want you to take. Most insect Clinton caught Conway. Mr. Conway, this is a Richard Ellis serving as magistrate at the City of Sarasota Surf. You're ready. We'll go on record for your case, which is styled a city of Sarasota vs JBC See Development LLC case number 2026 0, 0, 6, 1, 4, We start off with the City of Sarasota saw staff Mr. Spence, Mr. Spence allowing the city's position on this and then I'll come back to get your position so Mr. Spence, whenever you're ready, sir. >> There are. So. So this is a continued his dad for a violation of our city code section 16 dash. 49 C have a dense rank overgrowth on a vacant lot as a in this week, the property still remains out of compliance with the president on the property. As you can see from these photos. So that heard Mr. Conway when he thinks he can get a contractor or self out there to have approach him down and removed. Mr. Khan with But >> we have hired won. We've hired them a little while ago. Obviously the frequency that they're doing it is obviously not good enough. So we have the frequency with them and we should have today there's schedules for one. They're going to get out. There are trying to get them out there our this. >> All right. So basically what probably time a continuing this out to give them a chance to get the work done. So if I push this out 3 or 4 weeks earned you think you'll be room. >> The work will be done. >> That'll be as we get a double take photographs that we can get the code e-mail or number. We'll send you a photograph of the completion. >> Okay. All right. You have your health. You have your inspectors information. All right. We'll reset this Bring it back when Mr. Says What's what's available? We're looking at September 17th at Eleven-thirty that works out for you, Mr. Conway. >> and obviously I'm going to get this done and I'm we have keep going hopefully fast launch out during season, is going to complimentary there. So. >> All right. So this will together will continue out September 17th at 11:30AM, find a violation of 16. 49 see continuing at this point. Legendary S 11, 11. 35 incest, the 10th or 11th 30 after. All. Right. Very good. And you'll get a copy this orderly millet to OK? Good to have a good day, sir. Appreciate it. Thank you. By thank you. I we're on record for city of Sarasota versus Lee Clark. Many Houston in Beverly Andrews, case number 2026, 0, 0, 2, 1, 6, And for the record, your name again, please. Everly enters Andrews. You've been here before. So, you know, I always start with the Start with Mr. Spence not come right back. You're okay, Mr. Smith, whenever you're ready temperatures, this is a key to case we have for a violation of our Florida building code. One of 5.1 permits required. >> Where there's a fence that was installed without a permit. I am pleased to report that as of the final inspection on July 3rd, the properties noncompliance, okay. All The senators and guests, you're probably an agreement with that city's indicating year with their inspection, July through the found to be in compliance, saw. >> If let's just and going find at 105, 0.1 was corrected. July 30th 2000. 26, takes us to the issue of fines and costs and Mr. Spence's City have a recommendation on that issue. >> We do your honor. We after paired by the inspector with potential civil fine that had accrued to $23,300 with 4 inspections of 465 the city is not going requesting any of that. So if I'm wrong, you're requesting the city recoup. Its costs are foreign $65. So the taxpayers bear the brunt of this process. Sanders, you do you understand Mister Spence's recommendation to me there. >> Okay. get you have a response to it or want to add or >> that causes a little bit much for us. The 4, 6, 5, I wanted to know if that's something that the company that didn't stop the fence can pay because >> that's kind of a civil issue who's responsible? You have to talk to them about it talk to a lawyer about it. But the recommendations these making this is a good one for you because potential fine was $23,300 and find the recommendations for 0. Find someone to go with that. But I will assess the cost 4.65. The city does accept payments on these things so you can do it in incremental way. Okay. So anything that I have vacation, nothing to vacate in this one. Good luck to you, OK, take being. >> Now, will we get billed for? Well, >> If you want to make sure they have a copy email address and they'll what they'll do. So send a copy of the order with a link as to how to pay it. on the back of that. She's can help you back in with that. OK? Thank you. Nice to see you. Take care. All right. We're gonna go next. The city of Sarasota versus Dnd parent incorporated case number 2026, 0, 0, 5, 2, 8, And for the record, sir, your name, please. >> Matthew McNabb. All right, Mr. McNab. >> Alright, procedurally I we start with the City of Sarasota. Start with Mr. Spence and outline the city's position and I'll come back to get yours. Okay, Mr. Spence, whenever you're ready, sir. >> The results. This is a new case for violation of our city City Engineering Code, 30 dash, 10, 40 equipment and materials being stored on the city right of way. I am pleased to report with our inspection of July. 29, the property is now in compliance. >> OK, Mr. McNab to be agreement with that. >> Yes, I I have recently become the branch manager of this branch decks and docks and here in Sarasota and honestly have no good excuse for why that was being done other than my predecessor head been doing that. from what I understand, we got notice to our parent company in Clearwater and they and for me in right away, we rectified it. So okay. Very good. Well, I will find that the. >> Well, it's a 30 Dash 10 of the city code was correct on July. 29th 2026 takes us to the issue, fines and costs and Mr. Spence City have a recommendation on that issue. We are in affidavit created by the inspector with that of 10. So find that accrue to. >> $13,600 or 3 inspections of 3.90, it seems was very diligent everything taken care of when everything made aware. We're not asking for the civil fine. Just the cost $309 of the taxpayers bear the burden. Okay. Miss Minetti understand that recommendation and agreement with it are okay with it. >> All right. Let's go with that. I won't will not impose any fine is recommended. Just assess the costs for this process of 3.90. So the taxpayer doesn't bear the burden forward. And nothing to bake it on this Correct? So it's got Luxor. Take care. Thank Thank you. Thank you. Alright, run record for city of Sarasota versus Margaret Williams. That Sky case number 2026 0, 0, 1, 7, 5, And for the record, sir, your name, please park Graham, sir. What was the first time again? Frankie, thank you, Thank you. >> Mr. Graham, I don't. If you've been with us before, not the procedure. We start with the city with Mr. Spence and the city's position on the case. And I come right back to you. Okay, Mr. Spence, whenever you're ready serve. >> The results. This is a continue case. We have 4, 4 violations for something 16 dash. 49 be next being a center house and go through a 5.7, these 2 are corrected with our inspection on August 6. And then next to our city Code section 16 Dash 47 as well as send housing code violation through 5.1, 5, which leads to accessory structure and disrepair. These 2 were corrected with our inspection on August. 19th bring the property completely in compliance. All Mr. Graham Mr. Spence U.S. indicating completely in compliance. guess you agree with that. >> I will adopt his findings. 5 violations are corrected. On those dates, some Mr. Spence it. We go to the issue, fines and cost city any questions or city have a recommendation on this. We do. do have an active Perry been inspector. We had initially I couple know shows in previous hearings it relates to find a date with $11,700 and then 2 separate running portions of fines that ran from it was 24th 2026 to May 20st of 26 for 28 days $100 a day bringing that portion of $2,800 with a civil fine. Then running from May 20nd. 26 2 August 18th for 89 days at $250 a day bringing this portion of the $22,250 having the new SoFi and $36,750. 3 assess fines. are 3 incest inspections today to 3.90, with 3 additional ones at $225 bringing the new cost to me $615. The city is not going to be requesting all of that fine but would like to recruit $500 as well as the city's cost 6.15 do too. Unlike the time of this case that Iran. All right. So understand the recommendation, the potential fine. 36,007, 50 cities recommending a fine of $500 and costs the 6.15 for this process of the tax payers under the burden for it. I'd like to sure. >> I didn't know anything about this. I just found out about because that my aunt's house. She passed away on I didn't know I was like I said, I wasn't. Margaret Williams passed away, just passed And just trying do what I can well with the code enforcement. He's told me what you do. And I did. You know, right? Yeah, I say I didn't know who's going to take over this house at this point. >> I'm trying to we go on to probate court right now, OK? And hopefully that I be able to get it. I don't know. Yeah. Well, under the circumstance, one on one I could find out to, you know, to $200 and abets S the costs for the process. >> hopefully get it all sorted out you anything they can on this Yes or bake it. The prior order that established a big fine. So that will bring it down. And, you know, city except payments and you may want to wait till you sort out the probe it before deal with that. Okay. Let's it. $100 Fine. Costa, 6.15. Yeah. Yeah. Have a good day, sir. Thanks for coming to appreciate it. Thank you. Good luck with your probate process on this. >> This thing >> I will go to a city of Sarasota versus John Q Adams. The for this to a life estate. Amy Lorraine Adams's remainder man. about a 50% interest. Adams. If does remain a man to essendon about a 50% interest, it's that we have case number 2025, 0, 0, 7, 1, 8, 2026, 0, 0, 1, 1, 7, Chris Morrison here representing Mr. Adams, call yes. >> And so as you know, sir, I always start of the Start with Mr. Spent to come right back Mr. Spence, whenever you're ready. >> All right. The results starting with case number 2025, Dash, 0, 0, 7, 1, 8, the only 2 remaining outstanding violations. Are this often facial do without permit as well as the sighting? And then for case number 2026, Dash, 0, 0, 1, 1, 7, which is the fence in disrepair. We do have some portions of that damage months removed. There's the Mr. Morrison mentioned that they're still working to get that remained area removed. I know he's also mentioned there's a potential sale. The part of that may or may not take place in their working, you know, with a potential buyers. >> Mr. Morrison to speak on relation to when that takes place as well as get the other violations corrected. Yep, >> so yeah, we we had a guy will move the collapse fences that we saw the wreck. Apparently couple panels that need to be addressed. We'll get somebody other drug arrest them. I know Mr. Pearce also as well as requests is all that. It's part of the violation to cut back some of the overgrowth of the road, which will take care of. And then as far as the fate of the permitting issues, it is still our clients intent to sell the properties. We are discussions with the developer to sell all 3 parcels. There's no letter of intent or contract as of yet, but we are active discussions about that. My anticipation in the next 30 days, either that'll be at least to the point where there's a contract or agreement. will have listed all 3 properties for sale officially, but that the Mr. Adams has agreed to go ahead and just sell the properties thing. But somebody else kind of deal with that issue on that one house. >> All right. To the city with the city's wish. In this case, these cases probably looking at pushes out roughly 45 days to allow, you know, any potential seller made may not take place at all to be listed. And then some further development on the fence being removed and then we can kind of reassess from there and get an idea where things stand that will push us to October 15th that works on. >> We look at my calendar. Make. Leave. That's okay. But it will able >> That is in the middle of a kind of a trial period. >> What's a week either week or so before or after the October 22nd. Still most schedule. Let me Let's go ahead through the 22nd still in 3 week trial counter, but a one-day trial. So I can work around of the 20 seconds better than mornings or afternoons work better. Either one has won. >> have a right at the 30. We have mid at mid morning. Good morning. 30 10, 30 30. >> continue both cases up to October 22nd at 10, 30. Am the violations continuing and corrected as outlined by Mr. Spence in both cases. >> we will see Morrison take areas yearly. apologize for being here an outside bet early than late. Well, we say, thank you. Yeah. Yeah, right there, sir. If you would, please. Thank you. I we're going to go on record for city of Sarasota versus Jimmy L few is case number 2026, 0, 0, 6, 0, 1, And for the record, sir, your name, please. Ernest Arnold Arnold. And Sir, your name in few in the pews with us as well. All right, gentlemen procedure, we always start with the City of Sarasota, Mr. Spence's for the city day. He'll outline the city's position on this. >> And not come back to You get your response. Okay. So Mr. Spence, whenever you're ready, sir, themselves, this is a new case for numerous violations of our standard. >> Building safety of code 3, 1.4 to 4 order to demolish or repair as well as one violation of our city code 16 Dash. 47 the commissioner John rubbish and trash. As to my knowledge on >> Arnold Mister plans on, you know, remodeling the property and having it rehabbed. And they did send in a trend trans middle yesterday. looks like they're spending some corrections that need to be sent out in this interview. So we're just looking for a time frame you know, pushing this out probably to get out of the review process take place in just a question of when can get the junk trash and robust corrected. >> All Who spokesperson is, but or that, I'm not But we have. >> And no water in now. been. It. Was it Ben? I got house in the Bay. It's a one That's it. been a. All of them. But people put. When a quarter five-day game over there. Effort. But I know. Right, both from this evening my house. >> But we're all who would not overrun at my house everything. >> You mean? One? Nothing left And then they come rematch. I wouldn't But from and then some dollars a month. that in a bay. It won't be. It came up him and I have a 15 on dollar. B, I I mean, had a world of 8. Thank this man bubble that I might He said I have goal that day in my yard my young men to You hear me. And then made a man he'd 2 pitches. >> See that man. And we said I've been weighed in on him that com. That never got the year is receiving. You know, we have a man. Will. Me. I'm out. That I know we've never seen that day every day. Sit and wait, known him on Brad, we don't you. never to fueling the refocusing here a little bit. Looks like the. >> The issue right now is getting a building permit. Yeah. And this sounds like somebody is working on that. Yeah. And you and what we just need to do is figure out when you're going get that building permits. What do you think? >> I we need to call that lights is so grounded. >> Yeah. So you York and again, how long you think it's going to take get the permit? You have? >> I don't know we've Mr. the contractor. So even one vote to be good. >> Case you have a contract on this, who's in who's the contractor Nic, read okay, Mr. Reid, some mysteries working on, I'm glad you have a contractor on this. All right. So you know what I would suggest I'll do push his case out and get a chance. I get with Mr. Reading kind of get an idea what he thinks he can. We get contract and, you know, we get that permits should say, and we will take it from there. So let's figure something out here, Mr. Spence, what's available to us to bring this looking a little bit past 30 days out on September 24th at 10, 30. >> It's always a Thursday. How is that? There's the up into the case of that works for you September 24th at 10, 30 find violations continue at this point. But it's good. You have a and had a history in here before could contractor. So luck to you on this. So thank you. Take care. Thank you bill. have it. Thank What I like to voting. >> I would. I would talk to him about I don't use your question yet. >> All right. Thank you, sir. Good to see they care. That All right. We're gonna go on record have you pronounce your name properly? Here for me, with the new name, record, my name is Khan. One. >> It's a city of Sarasota in. And this is a case number 2026 0, 0, 4, 6, 9, when we we start with the start with the Mr. Spence for the City of Sarasota, he'll outline the city's position on this. And I'll come right back to you. very good. All right. Thank you. All right. Mr. Spence, whenever you're ready >> tell us this is a continue case we have with the only outstanding violation remaining is. >> Florida building code one of 5.1 permits required where there's a fence cells and stall without a permit. We do have a fence permit applied for as of July 29th. And we do see that trans middle has been turned in as August 14th. So we just need some zone here to review it. And then we can kind of progress is for hopefully get permit issue here the next week. It's working its way through the administrative process. Yeah, she's done what she needs to do. And just we wait that. >> As far as right now, yes, all right. So I got get your position on this. You agree with that you use when you're working on your application at this point. Okay. So what I would be inclined to do is push the case out with 30 days, 30 45 Honest to that one pushed out. What's available force, Mr. Spence. >> We have. >> And when 15 slot on September 17th. think one 15, that's September 17th that works out for you. >> Yes, I think so. And the 17? >> Okay. September 17. That the one 15, yes. this case out to September 17 to one 15. find a violation 105, 0.1 is continuing. We some point for care. Premises was corrected on 3/13/2026. We'll see you then, OK? And just keep up working way through process of doing. Thank you very much. you. >> Thank you. How lonely it The comment that I submitted. >> you. I really can't answer them. A city employee may be missed spite Bill, you a better answer, but I'm not sure he can >> What I would do to stay in touch with >> you that your contractor, your hard-won or if you buy for yourself. >> keep Look for comments, you know, then case or something else needed. But once it's issued, you just have pay for and then con inspections and should be good to go. Thank you so Thank you. Thank you. We're gonna go to our next series of cases. Here we have a city of Sarasota vs. >> Aloha Five's Management LLC. We have case numbers 2026 0, 0, 3, 3, 4, 2026 0, 0, 3, 3, 5, Does 26 0, 0, 3, 3, 6, And for the record all start with you, ma'am. Your name for the record. Please. And I the last thing >> be I believe this. the first that I use. >> Starting your name, please. Gabriel Solar storm. the last thing Z, a symbol. >> Very good. Thank procedurally I we start with the City of Sarasota with Mr. Spence Today and I'll come back back to to get your response. Okay, Mr. Spence, whenever you're ready, sir. >> I think we're like to tease out one by one. >> First one case number ending in 0, 0, 3, 3, 4, which pertains to Florida building code violation. One of 5.1 from its require where there's some pent up porch and report that was done without a permit. I am pleased report that that was corrected with our final inspection of. August. 11th. >> easy to getting. That was a violation. But the the violation was corrected with their inspection August. 11th, you agree with that? Yes, I On this case. I find 0, 0, 3, 3, for the violation of 1, 0, 5, one was correct. August 11, 2000. 26, you want to go into the next case, Mr. Spence. >> Correct. And that case is number 1920, they're to sever properties. But for the same violations, a violation of our Florida building code, one of 5.1 us required as well as our city Zoning Code section 6 dash 3, 0, to be where trying to pluck some kind of quadplex so to speak. I am pleased report all for these violations were With their our fight with the final building inspection on August, 19. All And agree with that as well. Okay. >> I will find that the violations in both of these cases, one of 5.1 and real to are correct. 8/19/2026. >> So takes us to the issue of fines and costs in all 3 cases, Mr. Spence's City have a recommendation. >> When yes, we do your honor in relation to the final cases, a 0, 0, 3, 3, 5, 0, 0, 3, 3, 6, We had enough created by inspectors for 0, 0, 3, 3, 5. We had potential fine of $20,300 for inspections of 465. So he's going to not requesting any of the Pfizer cost is applying a violation for that one. And then 3, 3, 6, a similarly had a $20,300 Fine as well as for inspections for 65. We're requesting any of that fun is to find violation. And then for the final case, 0, 0, 3, 3, 4, you have a final affidavit created by the inspector. With a potential fine 19,000, $400 for inspections of 465. Cities. Only requesting a $1000 fine and costs of $465. All So I want to show you understand the recommendation by Mr. Spence on last 2 cases. >> He's recommending no find no cost. So that's an easy You pay them. And this the first case is recommending a fine of $1000. Of the potential fire. 19 foreign cost of 4.65 for this process. When you get your response to that recommendation. >> I would be. >> sounds reasonable to me given the possibility. So let's go without a fight with 1000 or find cost of 4.65. >> Nothing to vacate any of these 3 cases for case number for you pick it apart. All they could fire order in this case to get rid of the bigger fines that have accrued. And so that will wrap up all 3 cases and thank you for solving the problem. Pre take it. Thank you have today. Thank Thank you. All right. We'll go on the record for our next case, which style. The city of Sarasota. France's top real estate Mom LLC, case number 2026, 0, 0, 4, 2, 3, And for the record, your name, please. >> My name is Houston. the runs them solace on the property owner. >> Gonzales. >> we start with the City of Sarasota saw start with Mr. Spence and Hill on the city's >> position. And then I'll come right back to So Mr. Spence, whatever your race. >> shows this is a these are both new cases. First, one, 2026 Dash, 0, 0, 4, 2, 3, per chance to a violation Florida building code 105, 0.1 permits required were there was some sightings and citing carport post as well as some structural poor gentleman replaced without a permit. We do have a permit application that was turned in on July 14th, but is pending some building corrections or to defer to Gonzalez and respiration to when she thinks she get those corrections turned in so we keep that permit progressing. It looks like there was a survey turned in, but there's also some more corrections needed. just ask for a time frame. Came out. If you can. >> Well, first of all, I apologize. I my husband and I bought the property and he was in distress. That was a tenant in place. And, you know, I didn't want to remove the 10 and from there. So we try to repair it as we could. We had no idea that he needed permit for this. We were informed after that. I hired someone to a process and after the fact permit. And it's been crazy trying to get a hold of this person, even though I follow up every every week. >> I she mentioned yes. And that that she had submitted the final the survey. I just ask her if she had any other updates. And I actually I wasn't aware that there were other things pending from her. >> I did have to have contractor certify and do the work because even though was my husband. Since the properties on my not are prior are personal names. I think that's a requirement. So I'm not sure exactly how much longer is going to take. I guess I just need an extension of this time so we can complete. And finished the process. >> All right. We've got somebody working on it. You pushing her little bit to get it. And will push to a push that this case out for you. So about the other case here with our situation. Yes, for case number 2026, Dash, 0, 1, 1, 2, 7, >> This one pertains to a number violations or vacation rental codes. First to 34.5 dash one and 19 Dash 8, 2, pertain to advertising in operating without a proper certificate. That one, those are those 2 still remain out of compliance with our inspection this week. Next, 34.5 dash 18 C section 2 dash 304. Be one as well as Section 6 DASH 2, 2, B for uses of the property which pertain advertising operating that occasion rental as under the minimum night standards as the 7, 9, minimum, those 3 were corrected with our inspection of a August 17th. So we're just waiting on issuance of a certificate for this one to take place to correct this violation. see this way for the inspection certificate than than >> Everything will be in Do you understand Mr. Spence is a summary there. >> Yes, actually, yes, it has spoke with who things Specter that in the case. And I provided him with proof that I actually updated the require state. A 28 days at a time because we I mean, it was my intention from the beginning. Have my more of a midterm rental instead of a short term. I do intend to get a permit in the future. So I can host for a shorter amount up days like 7 days. But at this time we're actually booked on a monthly basis until February. So he explained that there is no requirement to have registration or any other senses on a monthly basis. >> I think says laws you advertise for more than 7 days. I think you're good to go as I understand it. But but clarify the situations relation to we have in incident, especially that we haven't seen any information that she I was that we haven't seen yet. >> I believe there's factors or allow her to do the long term rentals in a month a month, you know, which would involve or this or this this code. But anything I believe under 30 days would still require the registration. So as of right now, especially as we've been still classified as a, you know, out of compliance. For the for second just goes. So she's averages for 28 days. >> The coat kicks and she needs to do inspections to to get get the license to do it right. So you understand, which is that what? So if you're if you advertise for a occupancy, less than 30 days to The board is kicks in place. So I think the only thing is remaining is that whenever you're try to do it, do it with under this process, you have to have an inspection of the premises. So it seems like that needs to be done. completed its own right. Is that right? Yes. >> RB R B o and that that's the one that I send the picture for. Its not updating that. I can show you from my own our view, you want. >> I know that I so just so it's clear. I updated BOCES just not showing. >> But >> thought on this is we have the other he would push to sell 30 days to let the after the fact permit to be issued and then we have the same time that comeback kid from you're in compliance with all the other issues here as well. So was pushed out 30 days. That works for. >> Okay. what I need to be here next by telephone, this in forms, you need to get if you appear buy a home, it will be best, OK? Well, they they they have the forums for you, sir. You can certainly do that. Okay. So it's funny. Good can be a time for us. We're looking at October. First of the for you. for mornings or afternoons. >> know are from the same time. >> We have 1 o'clock. >> 1 o'clock sounds good. continue both cases up to to October first to 01:00PM. >> The violation 105, continued in the first case 43 and in one to 7, the violation of 3 34. 0.5, 1981. 82 are continuing. The remaining violations were corrected on 8/17/2026. Hopefully we can wrap OK, Stephen, we need to come back up here by telephone next time. Okay. Thank you. Nice to see taking. Thank you. Is there any >> way that I can have more information on why the spending for the permanent. Besides read, the survey she submitted so I can. Of course, that's going to work across the street in the second floor. >> Just getting your permit numbers say, hey, can have all the information that's needed. That is missing and print out all that. So the red, this new building right across the street, second floor and you right there. Thank you. Take care. Thank you. All right. We'll go next to see Sarasota versus BP owes the 19 anyone main Lcb Posey. >> 1991 Main LLC doing business Astor Links case number 2025, 0, 1, 2, 6, 3, And I'll let you identify yourselves for the wreck again. Very few do again for me. Please call left. And slow. And ma'am. >> Cheryl, Carol, I went at Gray start with the management company for rulings over the last time was kick All right. >> Procedure that we start with the city. start with Mr, Spence and go out on the city's position and will come right back to the 2 of us Mr. Spence, whenever ready, sir, there are >> This is second to new case in relation to 2 zoning code violations. 7 dash 1, 0, 7, and 7 dash 109, a which pertains to signs and stall without a permit as well as some prohibited signs. I know there are some question in relation the banner that was placed up in the parking garage. Those kind of a little sticking point we have brought to city in relation to that. And we feel that we're comfortable with considering this property corrected and in compliance as of our inspection on July, 8th. >> Came in that sound reasonable to use. Well. with that, I'll find the violations of 7, 0, 1, 0, 7 is oneco. 7, 1, 0, 9, a zoning code. reckon with the inspection in July 2026 thanks to the issue, fines and costs expenses that you have a recommendation on that issue. >> We do your honor. We have a potential so fun that accrued from August 10 to 2025