The civic record
Read. Follow. Verify.North Dakota bill imposes liability and $10,000 daily fines on websites publishing sexual material without age verification
Last action · February 17, 2025: Second reading, failed to pass, yeas 36 nays 53Sponsors: Jared Hendrix and 11 others
Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.
What This Bill Proposed
Websites hosting sexual material harmful to minors are required to implement reasonable age verification methods and prevent minor access, or face civil lawsuits and daily fines of $10,000. The measure applies to websites serving North Dakota residents under eighteen and mandates the strict anonymization of user verification data.
Online adult-content providers face statutory liability and financial penalties for failing to verify user ages, while parents and guardians gain the right to sue platforms that allow minor access. Additionally, individuals whose identification data is improperly retained by a platform or third party can bring civil claims for damages and attorney fees.
Who It Would Have Affected
Groups the bill's text would have affected, as described in the record. Being affected is not a position for or against it.
covered platforms
Websites hosting sexual material must implement age verification technology, prevent minor access, protect user privacy, and face potential civil liability and daily fines.
parents or guardians
Parents and guardians are granted the right to bring civil lawsuits against platforms that allow their minor children access to restricted material.
internet service providers
ISPs, search engines, cloud providers, and app stores are explicitly protected from liability when they merely provide transmission, storage, or connectivity without creating the content.
news-gathering organizations
Bona fide news or public interest broadcasts, websites, videos, reports, and events are completely exempt from the requirements of the section.
Key Facts
You don't have to trust us. Each fact below is taken straight from the official document - click any one to see the exact passage, highlighted in the original.
Frequently Asked Questions
What websites are subject to the age verification and liability requirements?
Who can file a lawsuit against a website under this legislation?
Are news organizations and internet service providers covered by these rules?
What else do you want to know?
News Coverage
Follow the record
Votes, people, money & the original sourceWhere This Stands
This bill did not become law - Failed in the House.
Procedural history
5 actions- Feb 17, 2025HouseSecond reading, failed to pass, yeas 36 nays 53
- Feb 14, 2025HouseCommitteeAmendment adopted, placed on calendar
- Feb 13, 2025HouseCommitteeReported back amended, do pass, amendment placed on calendar 11 3 0
- Feb 12, 2025HouseCommitteeCommittee Hearing 09:00
- Jan 20, 2025HouseIntroducedIntroduced, first reading, referred Judiciary Committee
Version history
Only one version on file - nothing to compare yet. As later stages (committee substitute, engrossed, enrolled) are captured, the redline appears here.
View official text →Lobbying Activity
No state lobbying filings in our records match this bill. Federal lobbying reports (LDA) cover Congress, so they are not listed on state bills.
Full breakdown
Who this bill affects and the strongest case for and against it, written only from the bill’s own text.
Sponsors
Show 7 more sponsors
Connected Entities
Sources
ndlegis.gov
Analysis Score
0–100- Significance20Lowered because this bill did not pass (its text scored 65)
- Controversy80Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
- Entertainment15Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
- Buzz50Current news / social attention level
Publisher tools
