The civic record
Read. Follow. Verify.North Carolina requires county and city job applicants working with children to undergo criminal history checks
Last action · July 7, 2026: Ch. SL 2026-39Sponsors: Donnie Loftis and 16 others
Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.
What This Bill Would Do
Counties and cities in North Carolina must require s for any job applicants whose positions involve working with children in any capacity, effective October 1, 2025. Previously, local governments were only permitted to conduct such background checks at their discretion.
Local government applicants seeking employment involving children must submit to background checks through state and national repositories, changing the hiring process across all North Carolina counties and municipalities.
Who It Would Affect
Groups the bill's text would affect if enacted, as described in the record. Being affected is not a position for or against it.
counties
Boards of commissioners must require criminal history record checks for applicants applying for positions working with children.
cities
City councils must require criminal history record checks for applicants applying for positions working with children.
applicants for employment
Applicants applying for local government positions involving children are subject to mandatory criminal history record checks.
Key Facts
- Counties and cities must require criminal history record checks for employment applicants if the position requires working with children in any capacity.
- Record checks must be conducted by the State Bureau of Investigation in accordance with G.S. 143B-1209.26.
- The act becomes effective on October 1, 2025, and applies to applications for employment submitted on or after that date.
Frequently Asked Questions
When does this requirement take effect?
What else do you want to know?
News Coverage
Follow the record
Votes, people, money & the original sourceWhere This Stands
Currently passed both. The next step in the legislative lifecycle is Law.
Procedural history
32 actions- Jun 30, 2026HouseOrdered Enrolled
- Jun 30, 2026HouseConcurred In S Com Sub
- Jun 25, 2026HousePlaced On Cal For 06/30/2026
- Jun 25, 2026HouseCal Pursuant 36(b)
- Jun 24, 2026HouseRegular Message Received For Concurrence in S Com Sub
- Jun 24, 2026SenateRegular Message Sent To House
Show 26 earlier actions
- Jun 23, 2026SenateEngrossed
- Jun 23, 2026SenatePassed 3rd Reading
- Jun 23, 2026SenatePassed 2nd Reading
- Jun 23, 2026SenateAmend Adopted A1
- Jun 22, 2026SenateReptd Fav
- Jun 17, 2026SenateRe-ref Com On Rules and Operations of the Senate
- Jun 17, 2026SenateCom Substitute Adopted
- Jun 17, 2026SenateReptd Fav Com Substitute
- Jun 16, 2026SenateRe-ref to Agriculture, Energy, and Environment. If fav, re-ref to Rules and Operations of the Senate
- Jun 16, 2026SenateWithdrawn From Com
- Mar 26, 2025SenateRef To Com On Rules and Operations of the Senate
- Mar 26, 2025SenatePassed 1st Reading
- Mar 26, 2025SenateRegular Message Received From House
- Mar 26, 2025HouseRegular Message Sent To Senate
- Mar 25, 2025HousePassed 3rd Reading
- Mar 25, 2025HousePassed 2nd Reading
- Mar 24, 2025HousePlaced On Cal For 03/25/2025
- Mar 24, 2025HouseCal Pursuant Rule 36(b)
- Mar 24, 2025HouseReptd Fav
- Mar 18, 2025HouseRe-ref Com On Rules, Calendar, and Operations of the House
- Mar 18, 2025HouseReptd Fav
- Mar 4, 2025HouseRe-ref Com On State and Local Government
- Mar 4, 2025HouseReptd Fav
- Feb 24, 2025HouseRef to the Com on Judiciary 2, if favorable, State and Local Government, if favorable, Rules, Calendar, and Operations of the House
- Feb 24, 2025HousePassed 1st Reading
- Feb 21, 2025HouseIntroducedFiled
Version history
Only one version on file - nothing to compare yet. As later stages (committee substitute, engrossed, enrolled) are captured, the redline appears here.
View official text →Lobbying Activity
No state lobbying filings in our records match this bill. Federal lobbying reports (LDA) cover Congress, so they are not listed on state bills.
Full breakdown
Who this bill affects and the strongest case for and against it, written only from the bill’s own text.
Sponsors
Show 12 more sponsors
Sources
www.ncleg.gov
Analysis Score
0–100- Significance50How much this matters to a regular citizen
- Controversy10Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
- Entertainment5Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
- Buzz25Current news / social attention level
Publisher tools
