POLISCOPE
Back to bills

The civic record

Read. Follow. Verify.
High Impact

California AB 2023 requires AI companion chatbot operators to conduct child safety risk assessments and independent audits

Original title: Companion chatbots: children's safety.

Record date · August 30, 2026

Introduced
Committee
Floor Vote
Passed
Law

Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.

What This Bill Would Do

This bill mandates that operators of s perform annual child safety risk assessments by July 1, 2027, and submit independent compliance audits to the Attorney General. It also creates new legal pathways for children or their guardians to sue operators for damages if they suffer harm due to violations of these safety requirements.

Why it matters

The bill establishes new legal accountability for AI developers regarding child safety, potentially impacting how platforms are designed, monitored, and audited to prevent harm to minors.

Who It Would Affect

Groups the bill's text would affect if enacted, as described in the record. Being affected is not a position for or against it.

Directly affected

Companion chatbot operators

Operators must implement new risk assessment protocols, undergo independent audits, and face potential civil liability.

Directly affected

Minor users

Minors are the intended beneficiaries of the safety assessments and have the right to seek damages for harm.

Key Facts

You don't have to trust us. Each fact below is taken straight from the official document - click any one to see the exact passage, highlighted in the original.

Frequently Asked Questions

What must chatbot operators do to comply with this bill?
Operators must conduct annual risk assessments to identify child safety risks and undergo independent audits of their compliance.
Can I sue a chatbot company if my child is harmed?
Yes, the bill authorizes a child who suffers actual harm due to a violation of these provisions, or their parent/guardian, to bring a civil action against the operator.
Will the public be able to see the audit reports?
Generally, the audit reports are confidential, but the Attorney General is required to issue an annual public report summarizing the findings.

What else do you want to know?

News Coverage

Coverage by outlet perspective1 article
Unrated 1
Blind spot - only covered by center outlets

Bias ratings based on AllSides / Media Bias/Fact Check

Where This Stands

Currently filed. The next step in the legislative lifecycle is Committee.

Version history

Only one version on file - nothing to compare yet. As later stages (committee substitute, engrossed, enrolled) are captured, the redline appears here.

View official text →

Lobbying Activity

No state lobbying filings in our records match this bill. Federal lobbying reports (LDA) cover Congress, so they are not listed on state bills.

Full breakdown

Who this bill affects and the strongest case for and against it, written only from the bill’s own text.

Discoveries

1 pattern noticed across the record

Patterns POLISCOPE noticed across the record. These are observations to investigate, not conclusions.

policy shift90% confidence

Shift toward civil liability for AI developers

The bill moves beyond simple disclosure requirements to allow for private civil litigation and punitive damages for AI-related harms.

Connected Entities

Digital Age Assurance Act, Attorney General
otherDigital Age Assurance Act“Existing law regarding age verification for software applications.”Map →
OrganizationAttorney General“Receives audit reports and issues annual public reports on compliance.”Map →

Sources

Open source document

openstates.org

Analysis Score

0–100
  • Significance85
    How much this matters to a regular citizen
  • Controversy60
    Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
  • Entertainment20
    Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
  • Buzz75
    Current news / social attention level

Publisher tools

Share or embed this record

POLISCOPE publisher tools

Share or embed this record