POLISCOPE
Back to bills

The civic record

Read. Follow. Verify.

Michigan Senate Bill 895 exempts older convictions from habitual offender sentence enhancements

Original title: Criminal procedure: sentencing; habitual offender guidelines; modify.

Last action · April 14, 2026: REFERRED TO COMMITTEE ON CIVIL RIGHTS, JUDICIARY, AND PUBLIC SAFETYSponsors: Sue Shink and 1 other

Introduced
Committee
Floor Vote
Passed
Law

Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.

Public stanceCommunity reactions are separate from the official record and reporting.

What This Bill Would Do

Senate Bill 895 prohibits using prior felony convictions to enhance sentences under the state's laws if 10 or more years have passed between the of the prior conviction and the commission of a subsequent offense. The measure modifies sentencing rules for individuals with one, two, or three prior felony convictions.

Why it matters

Changes how long prior criminal records can impact future prison terms, directly affecting defendants facing repeat-offender sentencing enhancements by establishing a 10-year lookback limit.

Background
  • Michigan's habitual offender laws allow courts to impose harsher sentences on individuals convicted of multiple felonies. context

Who It Would Affect

Groups the bill's text would affect if enacted, as described in the record. Being affected is not a position for or against it.

Directly affected

defendants facing subsequent felony charges

Defendants with older prior felony convictions are protected from having those specific past convictions used to lengthen their sentences if a 10-year gap has occurred.

Directly affected

state courts and prosecutors

Judges and prosecutors must evaluate the time elapsed since a defendant's prior discharge date before applying habitual offender sentencing enhancements.

Key Facts

  • Prior felony convictions that precede a period of 10 or more years between the discharge date and the commission of a subsequent offense cannot be used for sentence enhancement.
  • Applies the 10-year lookback restriction across sections 10, 11, and 12 of chapter IX of the code of criminal procedure, covering individuals with one, two, or three or more prior felony convictions.
  • Retains provisions requiring the court to fix both minimum and maximum terms for indeterminate sentences upon conviction of a subsequent felony.
  • Maintains existing restrictions prohibiting the use of a conviction for enhancement if it is already used under another statute that forbids further enhancement.

Frequently Asked Questions

What does Senate Bill 895 change about habitual offender sentencing?
It adds a restriction that prevents courts from using a prior felony conviction to increase a sentence if 10 or more years have passed between the of the prior conviction and the new offense.
Does this apply to all repeat offenders?
The 10-year limit applies to the provisions under sections 10, 11, and 12 of chapter IX of the code of criminal procedure, affecting defendants with one or more prior felony convictions.

What else do you want to know?

News Coverage

No news coverage found yet. Articles are indexed twice daily.

Where This Stands

Currently in committee. The next step in the legislative lifecycle is Floor Vote.

Procedural history

2 actions
  1. Apr 14, 2026SenateCommittee
    REFERRED TO COMMITTEE ON CIVIL RIGHTS, JUDICIARY, AND PUBLIC SAFETY
  2. Apr 14, 2026SenateIntroduced
    INTRODUCED BY SENATOR SUE SHINK

Version history

Only one version on file - nothing to compare yet. As later stages (committee substitute, engrossed, enrolled) are captured, the redline appears here.

View official text →

Lobbying Activity

No state lobbying filings in our records match this bill. Federal lobbying reports (LDA) cover Congress, so they are not listed on state bills.

Full breakdown

Who this bill affects and the strongest case for and against it, written only from the bill’s own text.

Sponsors

Connected Entities

Stephanie Chang, Sue Shink
PersonStephanie Chang“Cosponsor of Senate Bill 895”Map →
PersonSue Shink“Primary sponsor of Senate Bill 895”Map →

Sources

Open source document

legislature.mi.gov

Analysis Score

0–100
  • Significance65
    How much this matters to a regular citizen
  • Controversy50
    Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
  • Entertainment5
    Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
  • Buzz35
    Current news / social attention level

Publisher tools

Share or embed this record

POLISCOPE publisher tools

Share or embed this record