POLISCOPE
Back to bills

The civic record

Read. Follow. Verify.
High Impact

Missouri bill limits civilian oversight board powers over police misconduct investigations

Original title: CIVILIAN REVIEW BOARDS

Last action · May 15, 2026: Referred: Emerging Issues(H)Sponsor: David Tyson Smith

Introduced
Committee
Floor Vote
Passed
Law

Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.

What This Bill Would Do

Local governments across Missouri may establish civilian review boards to investigate public complaints against law enforcement officers, while restricting board powers strictly to excessive force, abuse of authority, discourtesy, and offensive language. Unsworn complaints or prior withdrawn cases cannot serve as the sole basis for board findings, and any authority outside these specified powers is expressly and void.

Why it matters

Local civilian oversight entities face statutory caps on their investigative reach and evidentiary standards, restricting what types of officer misconduct they can examine and prohibiting findings based on unsworn testimony.

Who It Would Affect

Groups the bill's text would affect if enacted, as described in the record. Being affected is not a position for or against it.

Directly affected

local law enforcement officers

Law enforcement officers are subject to investigations and disciplinary recommendations by civilian review boards specifically concerning excessive force, abuse of authority, discourtesy, and offensive language.

Directly affected

members of the public

Members of the public gain the statutory framework to submit sworn complaints of specific police misconduct to local civilian review entities.

Directly affected

local governing bodies

Cities and counties are authorized to establish or utilize civilian review boards and are required to reimburse board members for reasonable and necessary expenses.

Key Facts

You don't have to trust us. Each fact below is taken straight from the official document - click any one to see the exact passage, highlighted in the original.

Frequently Asked Questions

What types of misconduct can a civilian review board investigate?
Boards are limited to investigating excessive use of force, abuse of authority, discourtesy, and offensive language or slurs relating to race, ethnicity, religion, gender, sexual orientation, and disability.
Can a review board base its findings on unsworn complaints?
No. The bill explicitly prohibits basing any finding or recommendation solely upon an unsworn complaint or statement.
Do civilian review board members get paid for their service?
Board members do not receive compensation, but they do receive reimbursement from the local governing body for all reasonable and necessary expenses.

What else do you want to know?

News Coverage

No news coverage found yet. Articles are indexed twice daily.

Where This Stands

Currently in committee. The next step in the legislative lifecycle is Floor Vote.

Procedural history

4 actions
  1. May 15, 2026HouseCommittee
    Referred: Emerging Issues(H)
  2. Jan 8, 2026HouseFloor
    Read Second Time (H)
  3. Jan 7, 2026HouseIntroduced
    Read First Time (H)
  4. Dec 22, 2025HouseIntroduced
    Prefiled (H)

Version history

Only one version on file - nothing to compare yet. As later stages (committee substitute, engrossed, enrolled) are captured, the redline appears here.

View official text →

Lobbying Activity

No state lobbying filings in our records match this bill. Federal lobbying reports (LDA) cover Congress, so they are not listed on state bills.

Full breakdown

Who this bill affects and the strongest case for and against it, written only from the bill’s own text.

Sponsors

Discoveries

1 pattern noticed across the record

Patterns POLISCOPE noticed across the record. These are observations to investigate, not conclusions.

policy shift95% confidence

State-Level Preemption of Local Police Oversight

The bill explicitly preempts any local oversight authority outside the enumerated statutory powers, creating a uniform statewide cap on what civilian boards can investigate.

Connected Entities

Joseph Engler, General Assembly, David Tyson Smith
PersonJoseph Engler“Chief Clerk of the House.”Map →
OrganizationGeneral Assembly“The legislative body of the state of Missouri.”Map →
PersonDavid Tyson Smith“Representative for District 046 who introduced HB 2569.”Map →

Sources

Analysis Score

0–100
  • Significance75
    How much this matters to a regular citizen
  • Controversy65
    Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
  • Entertainment10
    Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
  • Buzz40
    Current news / social attention level

Publisher tools

Share or embed this record

POLISCOPE publisher tools

Share or embed this record