POLISCOPE
Back to bills
Part ofCourts →

The civic record

Read. Follow. Verify.
Enacted

Louisiana authorizes East Baton Rouge Juvenile Court to raise civil filing fees and control expense fund

Original title: COURTS/JUVENILE: Provides relative to the judicial expense fund for the Juvenile Court for the parish of East Baton Rouge

Last action · June 23, 2026: Effective date: 08/01/2026.Sponsor: Barbara Reich Freiberg

Introduced
Committee
Floor Vote
Passed
Law

Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.

Public stanceCommunity reactions are separate from the official record and reporting.

What This Bill Does

Louisiana enacts law allowing the Juvenile Court of East Baton Rouge Parish to collect increased civil filing fees up to forty-five dollars and additional criminal nonsupport costs up to ten dollars, effective August 1, 2026. The legislation transfers fund control and annual audit duties from the chief judge to the judges acting en banc, while expressly prohibiting the payment of judge salaries from this fund.

Why it matters

Litigants filing civil actions or facing criminal in the East Baton Rouge Juvenile Court face higher court costs, while the court's collective judges gain direct authority to disburse those revenues for staff salaries, equipment, and court operations.

Who It Affects

Groups the bill's text affects, as described in the record. Being affected is not a position for or against it.

Directly affected

Civil litigants in East Baton Rouge Juvenile Court

Litigants filing actions or motions face increased court costs up to forty-five dollars, subject to civil procedure exemptions.

Directly affected

Defendants in criminal nonsupport cases

Defendants convicted or pleading guilty in criminal nonsupport proceedings face an additional cost up to ten dollars.

Directly affected

Court personnel and reporters

Court staff and reporters may receive salaries and compensation funded through the judicial expense fund.

Key Facts

You don't have to trust us. Each fact below is taken straight from the official document - click any one to see the exact passage, highlighted in the original.

Frequently Asked Questions

How much can the civil filing fee be increased to?
The civil filing fee can be set by the judges en banc up to an amount not exceeding forty-five dollars.
Who controls the judicial expense fund under the new law?
Control over the fund and its disbursements is held by the judges of the Juvenile Court of East Baton Rouge Parish .
Can judges receive salaries from the judicial expense fund?
No, the law explicitly prohibits the payment of any salary from the judicial expense fund to a judge of the court.

What else do you want to know?

News Coverage

No news coverage found yet. Articles are indexed twice daily.

Where This Stands

Current status: Became law without the governor's signature.

Procedural history

27 actions
  1. Jun 23, 2026House
    Becomes Act No. 928 without the Governor's signature.
  2. Jun 23, 2026House
    Effective date: 08/01/2026.
  3. May 28, 2026House
    Sent to the Governor for executive approval.
  4. May 27, 2026HouseEnrolled
    Enrolled and signed by the Speaker of the House.
  5. May 27, 2026SenateEnrolled
    Signed by the President of the Senate.
  6. May 26, 2026HouseIntroduced
    Read by title, roll called, yeas 93, nays 4. The Senate amendments, having received two-thirds vote of the elected members, were concurred in.
Show 21 earlier actions
  1. May 25, 2026House
    Scheduled for concurrence on 05/26/2026.
  2. May 20, 2026House
    Received from the Senate with amendments.
  3. May 19, 2026SenateIntroduced
    Reconsidered. Read by title; returned to the Calendar, subject to call.
  4. May 19, 2026Senate
    Rules suspended. Called from the Calendar.
  5. May 19, 2026SenateFloor
    Senate floor amendments read and adopted. Read by title, passed by a vote of 32 yeas and 1 nays, and ordered returned to the House. Motion to reconsider tabled.
  6. May 18, 2026Senate
    Rules suspended.
  7. May 18, 2026SenateIntroduced
    Read by title. Failed to pass by a vote of 17 yeas and 18 nays.
  8. May 18, 2026Senate
    Notice of reconsideration on the next legislative day.
  9. May 7, 2026SenateFloor
    Reported without Legislative Bureau amendments. Read by title and passed to third reading and final passage.
  10. May 6, 2026SenateIntroduced
    Read by title and referred to the Legislative Bureau.
  11. May 5, 2026SenateCommittee
    Rules suspended. Reported favorably.
  12. Apr 20, 2026SenateCommittee
    Read second time by title and referred to the Committee on Judiciary A.
  13. Apr 15, 2026HouseFloor
    Read third time by title, roll called on final passage, yeas 83, nays 12. The bill, having received two-thirds vote of the elected members, was finally passed, title adopted, ordered to the Senate.
  14. Apr 15, 2026Senate
    Received in the Senate. Read first time by title and placed on the Calendar for a second reading.
  15. Apr 14, 2026House
    Scheduled for floor debate on 04/15/2026.
  16. Apr 13, 2026HouseFloor
    Read by title, ordered engrossed, passed to 3rd reading.
  17. Apr 9, 2026HouseCommittee
    Reported favorably (10-0).
  18. Mar 9, 2026HouseIntroduced
    Read by title, under the rules, referred to the Committee on Judiciary.
  19. Feb 27, 2026House
    First appeared in the Interim Calendar on 2/27/2026.
  20. Feb 26, 2026House
    Prefiled.
  21. Feb 26, 2026HouseCommittee
    Under the rules, provisionally referred to the Committee on Judiciary.

Version history

Only one version on file - nothing to compare yet. As later stages (committee substitute, engrossed, enrolled) are captured, the redline appears here.

View official text →

Lobbying Activity

No state lobbying filings in our records match this bill. Federal lobbying reports (LDA) cover Congress, so they are not listed on state bills.

Full breakdown

Who this bill affects and the strongest case for and against it, written only from the bill’s own text.

Sponsors

Discoveries

1 pattern noticed across the record

Patterns POLISCOPE noticed across the record. These are observations to investigate, not conclusions.

policy shift95% confidence

Decentralization of Court Fund Control

Control of the judicial expense fund shifts from a single chief judge to the collective body of judges sitting en banc.

Connected Entities

Act 928, Juvenile Court of East Baton Rouge Parish, Nineteenth Judicial District and 1 more
otherAct 928“Enacted law designation from the 2026 Regular Session”Map →
OrganizationJuvenile Court of East Baton Rouge Parish“Court affected by the judicial expense fund modifications”Map →
locationNineteenth Judicial District“Judicial district where the clerk of court collects filing fees”Map →
PersonBarbara Reich Freiberg“Representative who sponsored House Bill 538”Map →

Sources

Open source document

www.legis.la.gov

Analysis Score

0–100
  • Significance45
    How much this matters to a regular citizen
  • Controversy10
    Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
  • Entertainment5
    Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
  • Buzz15
    Current news / social attention level

Publisher tools

Share or embed this record

POLISCOPE publisher tools

Share or embed this record