The civic record
Read. Follow. Verify.Massachusetts bill designates Food Protection Program as sole licensor for mobile food trucks and requires local fire safety inspections
Last action · March 16, 2026: Accompanied a study order, see H5235Sponsors: Marcus Vaughn and 8 others
Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.
What This Bill Would Do
The Food Protection Program is designated as the sole authority to license s, establishing statewide standards while allowing municipalities to assess operating fees. Mobile food trucks must pass an inspection by the fire department in their municipality of record before operating.
Changes regulatory compliance for food truck operators by centralizing licensure through a single state program while introducing mandatory municipal fire inspections and local operating fees.
- The bill was introduced by Representative Marcus S. Vaughn during the 194th session of the Massachusetts General Court. context
Who It Would Affect
Groups the bill's text would affect if enacted, as described in the record. Being affected is not a position for or against it.
Mobile food establishment operators
Operators must obtain licensure exclusively through the Food Protection Program and pass a municipal fire department inspection.
Municipalities
Local fire departments must conduct required safety inspections, and towns gain explicit authority to assess operating fees on food trucks.
Food Protection Program
The program becomes the sole authority responsible for promulgating rules, standards, and licenses for mobile food establishments.
Key Facts
You don't have to trust us. Each fact below is taken straight from the official document - click any one to see the exact passage, highlighted in the original.
Frequently Asked Questions
Who is responsible for issuing food truck licenses under this bill?
Are municipalities allowed to charge fees to food trucks?
What inspection is required for mobile food trucks?
What else do you want to know?
News Coverage
Follow the record
Votes, people, money & the original sourceWhere This Stands
Currently in committee. The next step in the legislative lifecycle is Floor Vote.
Procedural history
5 actions- Mar 16, 2026HouseAccompanied a study order, see H5235
- Sep 10, 2025JointHearing rescheduled to 09/10/2025 from 10:00 AM-01:35 PM in B-2 and Virtual<br> <span style="color: blue; font-style: italic;">Hearing updated to New End Time</span>
- Aug 29, 2025JointHearing scheduled for 09/10/2025 from 10:00 AM-1:00 PM in B-2
- Feb 27, 2025SenateSenate concurred
- Feb 27, 2025HouseCommitteeReferred to the committee on Public Health
Version history
Only one version on file - nothing to compare yet. As later stages (committee substitute, engrossed, enrolled) are captured, the redline appears here.
View official text →Lobbying Activity
No state lobbying filings in our records match this bill. Federal lobbying reports (LDA) cover Congress, so they are not listed on state bills.
Full breakdown
Who this bill affects and the strongest case for and against it, written only from the bill’s own text.
Sponsors
Connected Entities
Sources
malegislature.gov
Analysis Score
0–100- Significance50How much this matters to a regular citizen
- Controversy20Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
- Entertainment5Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
- Buzz30Current news / social attention level
Publisher tools
