POLISCOPE
Back to bills

The civic record

Read. Follow. Verify.
Did Not Advance

Texas Bill HB 37 prohibits abortion-inducing drugs and creates civil and qui tam private rights of action

Original title: Relating to abortion, including civil liability for distribution of abortion-inducing drugs; making conforming changes and harmonizing conforming provisions; authorizing a private civil right of action.

Last action · July 14, 2025: FiledSponsor: Jared Patterson

Introduced
Committee
Floor Vote
Passed
Law

Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.

Public stanceCommunity reactions are separate from the official record and reporting.

What This Bill Proposed

Effective October 1, 2025, House Bill 37 prohibits the manufacture, distribution, mailing, prescribing, or providing of abortion-inducing drugs in Texas, enforcing these restrictions entirely through private civil and lawsuits rather than state-level criminal prosecution. The legislation establishes strict for wrongful death or personal injury resulting from such drugs, imposes a six-year statute of limitations, and authorizes statutory damages of at least $100,000 per violation.

Why it matters

Residents and entities involved in supplying, prescribing, or distributing abortion-inducing drugs face exposure to private civil lawsuits and enforcement actions with minimum statutory damages of $100,000 per violation, with strict limitations on standard legal defenses and class-action litigation.

Who It Would Have Affected

Groups the bill's text would have affected, as described in the record. Being affected is not a position for or against it.

Directly affected

abortion-inducing drug manufacturers and distributors

Prohibits manufacturing and distribution within the state and subjects entities to strict joint and several liability and market-share liability for personal injury or wrongful death.

Directly affected

pregnant women

Exempted from direct civil liability and qui tam prosecution when seeking or using abortion-inducing drugs.

Directly affected

qui tam relators and private claimants

Granted standing to bring private civil and qui tam actions against violators of the abortion-inducing drug prohibitions and recover statutory damages.

Key Facts

You don't have to trust us. Each fact below is taken straight from the official document - click any one to see the exact passage, highlighted in the original.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the minimum statutory damages amount awarded to a successful qui tam relator?
A successful relator is awarded statutory damages of not less than $100,000 for each violation, alongside injunctive relief, costs, and reasonable attorney's fees.

What else do you want to know?

News Coverage

No news coverage found yet. Articles are indexed twice daily.

Where This Stands

This bill did not become law - Died at adjournment · introduced in the House.

Procedural history

1 action
  1. Jul 14, 2025HouseIntroduced
    Filed

Version history

Only one version on file - nothing to compare yet. As later stages (committee substitute, engrossed, enrolled) are captured, the redline appears here.

View official text →

Lobbying Activity

No state lobbying filings in our records match this bill. Federal lobbying reports (LDA) cover Congress, so they are not listed on state bills.

Full breakdown

Who this bill affects and the strongest case for and against it, written only from the bill’s own text.

Sponsors

Discoveries

1 pattern noticed across the record

Patterns POLISCOPE noticed across the record. These are observations to investigate, not conclusions.

policy shift99% confidence

Private Civil Enforcement Model

The bill shifts enforcement of abortion-inducing drug bans entirely away from traditional state criminal prosecution into private civil and qui tam litigation.

Connected Entities

Jared Patterson
PersonJared Patterson“Bill author/sponsor in the lower house”Map →

Sources

Open source document

capitol.texas.gov

Analysis Score

0–100
  • Significance20
    Lowered because this bill did not pass (its text scored 90)
  • Controversy95
    Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
  • Entertainment10
    Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
  • Buzz75
    Current news / social attention level

Publisher tools

Share or embed this record

POLISCOPE publisher tools

Share or embed this record