Defending American Property Abroad Act of 2026
January 15, 2026
Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.
Where This Stands
Currently passed_chamber. The next step in the legislative lifecycle is Signed.
Version history
Only one version on file - nothing to compare yet. As later stages (committee substitute, engrossed, enrolled) are captured, the redline appears here.
View official text →The Frame
This legislation creates a new economic enforcement tool for U.S. property owners abroad by potentially barring vessels that utilize seized assets from accessing the U.S. maritime market.
Potentially affected actors named in the source documents. Mention is not a position.
U.S. property owners abroad
They may gain a mechanism to pressure foreign governments for compensation regarding seized assets.
Foreign vessel operators
They face potential denial of entry into U.S. ports if they utilize facilities designated as restricted.
Western Hemisphere foreign trade partners
Their port facilities may be subject to U.S. entry restrictions if they nationalize or expropriate U.S.-owned property.
Current stage: passed_chamber.
Signed.
Summary
Why It Matters
This legislation creates a new economic enforcement tool for U.S. property owners abroad by potentially barring vessels that utilize seized assets from accessing the U.S. maritime market.
Key Facts
You don't have to trust us. Each fact below is taken straight from the official document - click any one to see the exact passage, highlighted in the original.
Frequently Asked Questions
Does this bill apply to all foreign ports?
Can a vessel still enter a U.S. port if it has an emergency?
How can a foreign port be removed from the restricted list?
News Coverage
Voting Record
Total
406
Yes
244
No
162
Present
0
Not Voting
0
Abstain
0
How they voted (406)
Steny Hoyer
D · no
Diana Harshbarger
R · yes
William Timmons
R · yes
Gilbert Cisneros
D · no
John Rose
R · yes
Daniel Meuser
R · yes
Ilhan Omar
D · no
Robert Wittman
R · yes
Al Green
D · no
Ronny Jackson
R · yes
Ashley Hinson
R · yes
André Carson
D · no
Adriano Espaillat
D · no
Bonnie Watson Coleman
D · no
Glenn Grothman
R · yes
Tom Cole
R · yes
Jesús García
D · no
Dina Titus
D · no
Maxine Dexter
D · no
Mike Haridopolos
R · yes
Eric Sorensen
D · no
Pete Stauber
R · yes
Richard Hudson
R · yes
Stephanie Bice
R · yes
+ 382 more
Sponsors
Show 1 more sponsor
Discoveries
Patterns POLISCOPE noticed across the record. These are observations to investigate, not conclusions.
Leveraging Maritime Access for Property Rights
The bill represents a shift toward using U.S. port access as a direct enforcement mechanism for international property disputes.
Connected Entities
Sources
www.congress.gov
Analysis Score
0–100- Significance75How much this matters to a regular citizen
- Controversy60Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
- Entertainment10Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
- Buzz25Current news / social attention level
Publisher tools