POLISCOPE
Back to bills

The civic record

Read. Follow. Verify.
Did Not Advance

Texas HB 2069 establishes parental intervention rights and bans certain restraints for child emergency detentions

Original title: Relating to a parent's right to intervene in the apprehension by a peace officer of a child for an emergency detention and certain requirements and restrictions applicable to an emergency detention.

Last action · March 14, 2025: Referred to Homeland Security, Public Safety & Veterans' AffairsSponsor: Lacey Hull

Introduced
Committee
Floor Vote
Passed
Law

Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.

Public stanceCommunity reactions are separate from the official record and reporting.

What This Bill Proposed

Official description

Relating to a parent's right to intervene in the apprehension by a peace officer of a child for an emergency detention and certain requirements and restrictions applicable to an emergency detention.

Why it matters

Parents gain the legal authority to seek voluntary mental health treatment of their choice for a minor child facing , while law enforcement officers face new documentation and restraint restrictions when handling minors.

Background
  • Emergency mental health detentions in Texas allow law enforcement officers to take individuals into custody without a warrant if there is a substantial risk of serious harm due to mental illness. context
  • School district peace officers operate under specific statutory guidelines defined in the Texas Education Code. context

Who It Would Have Affected

Groups the bill's text would have affected, as described in the record. Being affected is not a position for or against it.

Directly affected

Parents and Guardians

Gain the explicit legal right to be contacted before a child's emergency detention, take custody of the child, and choose voluntary treatment providers.

Directly affected

Peace Officers

Must follow mandatory pre-detention parental contact procedures, use age-appropriate trauma-informed practices, document contact efforts, and adhere to restraint bans for young children.

Directly affected

Minors and Children Under 18

Subject to new protective restrictions regarding the use of restraints during emergency mental health detentions and increased parental involvement.

Key Facts

You don't have to trust us. Each fact below is taken straight from the official document - click any one to see the exact passage, highlighted in the original.

Frequently Asked Questions

What rights do parents have when a child is placed under emergency detention?
A parent, guardian, , or person standing in parental relation has the right to take custody of the child and voluntarily seek treatment or services from a provider of their choice.
Are peace officers allowed to use handcuffs on children aged 10 or younger during an emergency detention?
Peace officers cannot use handcuffs, electrical devices, chemical agents, or similar restraint devices on a child 10 years of age or younger unless the officer believes the child poses an imminent risk of harm to themselves or another person.
What documentation is required if a school district peace officer detains a child?
The officer must document the attempt to contact a parent or guardian in the form filed with the facility and also in the child's student records, with a copy forwarded to the parent or guardian.

What else do you want to know?

News Coverage

No news coverage found yet. Articles are indexed twice daily.

Where This Stands

This bill did not become law - Died at adjournment · in House committee.

Procedural history

3 actions
  1. Mar 14, 2025HouseCommittee
    Referred to Homeland Security, Public Safety & Veterans' Affairs
  2. Mar 14, 2025HouseIntroduced
    Read first time
  3. Jan 24, 2025HouseIntroduced
    Filed

Version history

Only one version on file - nothing to compare yet. As later stages (committee substitute, engrossed, enrolled) are captured, the redline appears here.

View official text →

Lobbying Activity

No state lobbying filings in our records match this bill. Federal lobbying reports (LDA) cover Congress, so they are not listed on state bills.

Full breakdown

Who this bill affects and the strongest case for and against it, written only from the bill’s own text.

Sponsors

Discoveries

1 pattern noticed across the record

Patterns POLISCOPE noticed across the record. These are observations to investigate, not conclusions.

policy shift95% confidence

Mandatory Parental Notification and Restraint Limits for Minor Detentions

The bill shifts protocol by legally requiring peace officers to attempt parent contact before detaining a minor for emergency mental health reasons and explicitly restricting mechanical restraints on children aged 10 or younger.

Connected Entities

Education Code, Lacey Hull
OrganizationEducation Code“Referenced regarding school district peace officers commissioned under Section 3”Map →
PersonLacey Hull“Primary bill sponsor in the lower house”Map →

Sources

Open source document

capitol.texas.gov

Analysis Score

0–100
  • Significance20
    Lowered because this bill did not pass (its text scored 65)
  • Controversy40
    Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
  • Entertainment10
    Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
  • Buzz30
    Current news / social attention level

Publisher tools

Share or embed this record

POLISCOPE publisher tools

Share or embed this record