The civic record
Read. Follow. Verify.Texas legislature proposes two-consecutive-term limit for major statewide offices
Last action · August 21, 2025: FiledSponsor: Nathan Johnson
Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.
What This Bill Proposed
Texas Senate Joint Resolution 4 proposes a to limit individuals to two consecutive terms in major statewide offices, excluding judicial positions. If approved by voters on November 3, 2026, officials could still serve non-consecutive terms or continue as s until a successor qualifies.
The measure directly alters the eligibility rules for individuals seeking to hold specific statewide executive positions continuously over multiple election cycles.
Who It Would Have Affected
Groups the bill's text would have affected, as described in the record. Being affected is not a position for or against it.
Statewide executive officeholders
Holders of covered executive offices are restricted from seeking or being appointed to a third consecutive term.
Texas voters
Key Facts
You don't have to trust us. Each fact below is taken straight from the official document - click any one to see the exact passage, highlighted in the original.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which offices are affected by the proposed term limits?
Does this amendment ban someone from ever holding the same office again?
What else do you want to know?
News Coverage
Follow the record
Votes, people, money & the original sourceWhere This Stands
This bill did not become law - Died at adjournment · passed the Senate · in the House.
Procedural history
2 actions- Aug 21, 2025SenateIntroducedFiled
- Aug 21, 2025SenateReceived by the Secretary of the Senate
Version history
Only one version on file - nothing to compare yet. As later stages (committee substitute, engrossed, enrolled) are captured, the redline appears here.
View official text →Lobbying Activity
No state lobbying filings in our records match this bill. Federal lobbying reports (LDA) cover Congress, so they are not listed on state bills.
Full breakdown
Who this bill affects and the strongest case for and against it, written only from the bill’s own text.
Sponsors
Connected Entities
Sources
capitol.texas.gov
Analysis Score
0–100- Significance20Lowered because this bill did not pass (its text scored 75)
- Controversy50Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
- Entertainment10Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
- Buzz40Current news / social attention level
Publisher tools
