The civic record
Read. Follow. Verify.No Preference Act (HR 7654) introduced to regulate federal contracting
Last action · September 3, 2026: Referred to the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform, and in addition to the Committee on Armed Services, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.Sponsors: Stephanie Bice and 4 others
Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.
What This Bill Would Do
The No Preference Act (HR 7654) has been introduced to establish new standards for federal government contracting and processes. The bill is currently under review by the House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform and the Committee on Armed Services.
This legislation establishes the framework for how federal agencies award contracts, affecting the competitive landscape for businesses seeking to provide goods and services to the government.
Who It Would Affect
Groups the bill's text would affect if enacted, as described in the record. Being affected is not a position for or against it.
Federal agencies
These entities must adhere to any new procurement standards established by the bill if it is enacted.
Government contractors
These businesses are subject to the rules and preferences defined in federal contracting law.
Key Facts
You don't have to trust us. Each fact below is taken straight from the official document - click any one to see the exact passage, highlighted in the original.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is the No Preference Act?
What happens to the bill now?
What else do you want to know?
News Coverage
Bias ratings based on AllSides / Media Bias/Fact Check
Follow the record
Votes, people, money & the original sourceWhere This Stands
Currently in committee. The next step in the legislative lifecycle is Floor Vote.
Procedural history
2 actions- Sep 3, 2026HouseCommitteeReferred to the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform, and in addition to the Committee on Armed Services, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
- Sep 3, 2026HouseIntroducedIntroduced in House
Version history
Only one version on file - nothing to compare yet. As later stages (committee substitute, engrossed, enrolled) are captured, the redline appears here.
View official text →Full breakdown
Who this bill affects and the strongest case for and against it, written only from the bill’s own text.
Sponsors
Discoveries
Patterns POLISCOPE noticed across the record. These are observations to investigate, not conclusions.
Legislative focus on procurement
The introduction of the 'No Preference Act' suggests a potential legislative effort to modify existing federal contracting preferences.
Connected Entities
Sources
www.congress.gov
Analysis Score
0–100- Significance40How much this matters to a regular citizen
- Controversy20Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
- Entertainment5Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
- Buzz10Current news / social attention level
Publisher tools
