POLISCOPE
Back to bills

The civic record

Read. Follow. Verify.
Enacted

Montana requires advisory committees for tax increment financing districts and adds school and county representatives to urban renewal boards

Original title: Require advisory committee for districts that use tax increment financing

Last action · April 3, 2025: Chapter Number AssignedSponsor: Jeremy Trebas

Introduced
Committee
Floor Vote
Passed
Law

Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.

What This Bill Does

Montana law now requires local governments that adopt provisions to appoint an advisory committee that includes representatives from overlapping local taxing bodies, and mandates that urban renewal agency boards include at least one representative from both the county and overlapping school districts.

Why it matters

Local taxing jurisdictions gain formal representation and consultation rights regarding the formation and administration of districts that capture local property tax revenues.

Background
  • Tax increment financing is a mechanism used by local governments in Montana to fund infrastructure and development improvements using the tax revenue generated from the increased property value within a designated district. context
  • SB 3 was introduced by Senator Jeremy Trebas at the request of the Revenue Interim Committee during the 2025 legislative session. context

Who It Affects

Groups the bill's text affects, as described in the record. Being affected is not a position for or against it.

Directly affected

School districts

School districts with overlapping boundaries must receive notice of proposed tax increment financing provisions, participate in public consultation meetings, and gain mandatory representation on urban renewal boards and advisory committees.

Directly affected

Counties

Counties with territory overlapping urban renewal areas or targeted economic development districts receive mandatory consultation rights, advisory committee representation, and a designated seat on urban renewal boards.

Directly affected

Local governments

Local legislative bodies adopting tax increment financing provisions are now required to appoint advisory committees and include specific local governmental and school district representatives on urban renewal boards.

Key Facts

You don't have to trust us. Each fact below is taken straight from the official document - click any one to see the exact passage, highlighted in the original.

Frequently Asked Questions

Who must be included on the newly required advisory committees for tax increment financing districts?
The committees must include at least one representative from each incorporated city or town, county, or school district with boundaries that overlap with the or , and may include other overlapping taxing bodies.
Are all urban renewal areas required to appoint an advisory committee under this law?
No. An administered by an urban renewal agency created under 7-15-4232(2) is exempt from the advisory committee requirement.

What else do you want to know?

News Coverage

No news coverage found yet. Articles are indexed twice daily.

Where This Stands

Current status: Signed into law.

Procedural history

35 actions
  1. Apr 3, 2025Senate
    Chapter Number Assigned
  2. Apr 3, 2025SenateEnrolled
    (S) Signed by Governor
  3. Mar 27, 2025Senate
    (S) Transmitted to Governor
  4. Mar 26, 2025House
    (H) Signed by Speaker
  5. Mar 24, 2025Senate
    (S) Signed by President
  6. Mar 19, 2025Senate
    (S) Returned from Enrolling
Show 29 earlier actions
  1. Mar 18, 2025Senate
    (S) Sent to Enrolling
  2. Mar 18, 2025House
    (H) 3rd Reading
  3. Mar 18, 2025House
    (H) Returned to Senate
  4. Mar 18, 2025House
    (H) Scheduled for 3rd Reading
  5. Mar 17, 2025House
    (H) 2nd Reading
  6. Mar 17, 2025House
    (H) Scheduled for 2nd Reading
  7. Feb 18, 2025HouseCommittee
    (H) Committee Report
  8. Feb 18, 2025HouseCommittee
    (H) Committee Executive Action
  9. Feb 5, 2025House
    (H) Hearing
  10. Feb 4, 2025House
    (H) 1st Reading
  11. Feb 4, 2025HouseCommittee
    (H) Referred to Committee
  12. Feb 3, 2025Senate
    (S) Transmitted to House
  13. Feb 3, 2025Senate
    (S) 3rd Reading
  14. Jan 31, 2025Senate
    (S) 2nd Reading
  15. Jan 31, 2025Senate
    (S) Scheduled for 2nd Reading
  16. Jan 29, 2025SenateCommittee
    (S) Committee Report
  17. Jan 29, 2025SenateCommittee
    (S) Committee Executive Action
  18. Jan 8, 2025Senate
    (S) Hearing
  19. Jan 7, 2025SenateCommittee
    (S) Referred to Committee
  20. Jan 7, 2025Senate
    (S) 1st Reading
  21. Nov 19, 2024SenateIntroduced
    (S) Introduced
  22. Nov 19, 2024House
    (LC) Draft Delivered to Requester
  23. Nov 19, 2024House
    (LC) Draft Ready for Delivery
  24. Nov 15, 2024House
    (LC) Draft in Assembly
  25. Nov 7, 2024House
    (LC) Draft in Final Drafter Review
  26. Sep 27, 2024House
    (LC) Draft in Input/Proofing
  27. Sep 13, 2024House
    (LC) Draft in Edit
  28. Sep 11, 2024House
    (LC) Draft in Legal Review
  29. Sep 4, 2024House
    (LC) Drafter Assigned

Version history

Only one version on file - nothing to compare yet. As later stages (committee substitute, engrossed, enrolled) are captured, the redline appears here.

View official text →

Lobbying Activity

No state lobbying filings in our records match this bill. Federal lobbying reports (LDA) cover Congress, so they are not listed on state bills.

Full breakdown

Who this bill affects and the strongest case for and against it, written only from the bill’s own text.

Sponsors

Discoveries

1 pattern noticed across the record

Patterns POLISCOPE noticed across the record. These are observations to investigate, not conclusions.

policy shift95% confidence

Mandatory Multi-Jurisdictional Oversight for TIF

The legislation shifts oversight of tax increment financing from solely municipal control to a mandatory multi-jurisdictional advisory model involving counties and school districts.

Connected Entities

Jeremy Trebas, Revenue Interim Committee
PersonJeremy Trebas“Senator, District 10, sponsor of SB 3”Map →
OrganizationRevenue Interim Committee“Committee that requested the bill”Map →

Sources

Open source document

bills.legmt.gov

Analysis Score

0–100
  • Significance65
    How much this matters to a regular citizen
  • Controversy25
    Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
  • Entertainment5
    Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
  • Buzz15
    Current news / social attention level

Publisher tools

Share or embed this record

POLISCOPE publisher tools

Share or embed this record