POLISCOPE
Back to bills
Part ofTaxes →

The civic record

Read. Follow. Verify.
Did Not Advance

Oregon Senate Joint Resolution 201 Diverts Half of Personal Tax Surplus Above $300 Million to Schools and Wildfire Funds

Original title: Proposes an amendment to the Oregon Constitution to require a portion of surplus revenue that would otherwise be returned to personal income taxpayers to be used for funding public kindergarten through grade 12 education, community colleges and wildfire prevention and suppression, if surplus revenue exceeds a certain threshold.

Last action · March 6, 2026: In committee upon adjournment.Sponsors: Sen Prozanski and 6 others

Introduced
Committee
Floor Vote
Passed
Law

Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.

Public stanceCommunity reactions are separate from the official record and reporting.

What This Bill Proposed

Official description

Digest: The measure would change the personal kicker to have half the moneys used for schools and wildfire, if the excess revenue was more than a certain amount. (Flesch Readability Score: 60.3). Proposes an amendment to the Oregon Constitution to require a portion of surplus revenue that would otherwise be returned to personal income taxpayers to be used for funding public kindergarten through grade 12 education, community colleges and wildfire prevention and suppression, if surplus revenue exceeds a certain threshold. Refers the proposed amendment to the people for their approval or rejection at the next regular general election.

Why it matters

Personal income taxpayers stand to receive smaller surplus refunds when state revenue collections exceed estimates by more than $300 million, while public schools and wildfire suppression programs receive dedicated reserve funding.

Background
  • Oregon's 'kicker' law requires the state to return surplus tax revenue to taxpayers when actual collections exceed official revenue forecasts by more than two percent. context
  • Constitutional amendments in Oregon must be referred to the voters and approved at a regular general election before taking effect. context

Who It Would Have Affected

Groups the bill's text would have affected, as described in the record. Being affected is not a position for or against it.

Directly affected

Personal income taxpayers

Taxpayers receive smaller surplus refund payments when state revenue collections exceed the $300 million threshold.

Directly affected

Public education K-12 and community colleges

Educational institutions receive additional funding from half of the surplus revenue exceeding $300 million.

Directly affected

Wildfire prevention and suppression programs

Wildfire programs receive dedicated reserve funding from half of the surplus revenue exceeding $300 million.

Key Facts

You don't have to trust us. Each fact below is taken straight from the official document - click any one to see the exact passage, highlighted in the original.

Frequently Asked Questions

What happens to the personal tax surplus under this measure?
If the surplus exceeds $300 million for a , half of the excess is returned to taxpayers and the other half is allocated equally to education and wildfire prevention.
When would these changes take effect?
The amendment applies to biennia beginning on or after July 1, 2027, subject to voter approval at the next regular general election.

What else do you want to know?

News Coverage

No news coverage found yet. Articles are indexed twice daily.

Where This Stands

This bill did not become law - Died at adjournment · in Senate committee.

Procedural history

4 actions
  1. Mar 6, 2026Senate
    In committee upon adjournment.
  2. Feb 18, 2026Senate
    Public Hearing held.
  3. Feb 2, 2026Senate
    Referred to Finance and Revenue, then Rules.
  4. Feb 2, 2026Senate
    Introduction and first reading. Referred to President's desk.

Version history

Only one version on file - nothing to compare yet. As later stages (committee substitute, engrossed, enrolled) are captured, the redline appears here.

View official text →

Lobbying Activity

No state lobbying filings in our records match this bill. Federal lobbying reports (LDA) cover Congress, so they are not listed on state bills.

Full breakdown

Who this bill affects and the strongest case for and against it, written only from the bill’s own text.

Sponsors

Discoveries

1 pattern noticed across the record

Patterns POLISCOPE noticed across the record. These are observations to investigate, not conclusions.

policy shift95% confidence

Modification of Oregon's Personal Kicker

The measure introduces a diversion mechanism for personal income tax surplus refunds that historically went entirely to taxpayers when thresholds were met.

Connected Entities

General Fund, Oregon Constitution
otherGeneral Fund“State fund receiving revenues and surpluses.”Map →
otherOregon Constitution“The constitution being amended by the resolution.”Map →

Sources

Open source document

olis.oregonlegislature.gov

Analysis Score

0–100
  • Significance20
    Lowered because this bill did not pass (its text scored 75)
  • Controversy80
    Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
  • Entertainment10
    Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
  • Buzz50
    Current news / social attention level

Publisher tools

Share or embed this record

POLISCOPE publisher tools

Share or embed this record