POLISCOPE
Back to bills

The civic record

Read. Follow. Verify.
Passed

North Carolina bans public agencies from buying foreign-made U.S. and state flags

Original title: U.S. & N.C. Flags/Made In USA.

Last action · April 9, 2025: Ref To Com On Rules and Operations of the Senate (Senate action)Sponsors: Ed Goodwin and 36 others

Introduced
Committee
Floor Vote
Passed
Law

Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.

What This Bill Would Do

North Carolina requires all state institutions and s to use public funds exclusively for U.S. and North Carolina flags that are 100% manufactured in the United States, effective October 1, 2025.

Why it matters

Local governments and state agencies must alter their procurement contracts to ensure flag suppliers verify domestic material sourcing.

Who It Would Affect

Groups the bill's text would affect if enacted, as described in the record. Being affected is not a position for or against it.

Directly affected

State institutions and political subdivisions

Must verify that any U.S. or North Carolina flags purchased with public funds meet the 100% domestic manufacturing requirement.

Directly affected

Domestic flag manufacturers

Eligible to supply flags purchased with public funds by North Carolina state and local government entities.

Key Facts

  • State institutions and political subdivisions are prohibited from using public funds to buy U.S. or North Carolina flags unless they are 100% manufactured in the United States.
  • All articles, materials, or supplies used in the flags must be grown, produced, or manufactured entirely within the United States.
  • The purchasing restriction applies to all covered purchases made on or after October 1, 2025.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which organizations must follow this flag purchasing rule?
All State institutions and s of North Carolina are subject to this requirement.
When does the domestic flag requirement take effect?
The law becomes effective on October 1, 2025, and applies to purchases made on or after that date.

What else do you want to know?

News Coverage

No news coverage found yet. Articles are indexed twice daily.

Where This Stands

Currently passed chamber. The next step in the legislative lifecycle is Law.

Procedural history

16 actions
  1. Apr 9, 2025Senate
    Ref To Com On Rules and Operations of the Senate
  2. Apr 9, 2025Senate
    Passed 1st Reading
  3. Apr 9, 2025Senate
    Regular Message Received From House
  4. Apr 9, 2025House
    Regular Message Sent To Senate
  5. Apr 8, 2025House
    Passed 3rd Reading
  6. Apr 8, 2025House
    Passed 2nd Reading
Show 10 earlier actions
  1. Apr 3, 2025House
    Placed On Cal For 04/08/2025
  2. Apr 3, 2025House
    Cal Pursuant Rule 36(b)
  3. Apr 3, 2025House
    Reptd Fav
  4. Apr 1, 2025House
    Re-ref Com On Rules, Calendar, and Operations of the House
  5. Apr 1, 2025House
    Reptd Fav
  6. Mar 18, 2025House
    Re-ref Com On Commerce and Economic Development
  7. Mar 18, 2025House
    Reptd Fav
  8. Feb 27, 2025House
    Ref to the Com on State and Local Government, if favorable, Commerce and Economic Development, if favorable, Rules, Calendar, and Operations of the House
  9. Feb 27, 2025House
    Passed 1st Reading
  10. Feb 26, 2025HouseIntroduced
    Filed

Version history

Only one version on file - nothing to compare yet. As later stages (committee substitute, engrossed, enrolled) are captured, the redline appears here.

View official text →

Lobbying Activity

No state lobbying filings in our records match this bill. Federal lobbying reports (LDA) cover Congress, so they are not listed on state bills.

Full breakdown

Who this bill affects and the strongest case for and against it, written only from the bill’s own text.

Sponsors

Show 32 more sponsors
LoweryHouseCosponsorNo profile match

Connected Entities

Chapter 144, Dennis Riddell, Ed Goodwin and 2 more
otherChapter 144“Statute chapter being amended by the bill”Map →
PersonDennis Riddell“Sponsor of House Bill 227”Map →
PersonEd Goodwin“Primary sponsor of House Bill 227”Map →
PersonAllen Chesser“Sponsor of House Bill 227”Map →
PersonCharles Smith“Sponsor of House Bill 227”Map →

Sources

Analysis Score

0–100
  • Significance35
    How much this matters to a regular citizen
  • Controversy15
    Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
  • Entertainment5
    Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
  • Buzz20
    Current news / social attention level

Publisher tools

Share or embed this record

POLISCOPE publisher tools

Share or embed this record