The civic record
Read. Follow. Verify.Mississippi Senate Bill 2289 redefines dyslexia for state scholarship program
Last action · February 3, 2026: 02/03 (S) Died In CommitteeSponsor: Dennis DeBar
Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.
What This Bill Proposed
Senate Bill 2289 updates the legal definition of dyslexia within Mississippi's Dyslexia Therapy Scholarship for Students with Dyslexia Program, expanding criteria to include factors like , morphological processing, and developmental influences, effective July 1, 2026.
Changes statutory criteria used to qualify students for state-funded dyslexia therapy scholarships and specialized educational services.
Who It Would Have Affected
Groups the bill's text would have affected, as described in the record. Being affected is not a position for or against it.
Students with dyslexia
The clinical definition used to diagnose their learning disability for state scholarship eligibility is revised.
State Department of Education
Must administer educator licensing and scholarship standards under the revised statutory definition.
Key Facts
You don't have to trust us. Each fact below is taken straight from the official document - click any one to see the exact passage, highlighted in the original.
Frequently Asked Questions
What does Senate Bill 2289 change?
What else do you want to know?
News Coverage
Follow the record
Votes, people, money & the original sourceWhere This Stands
This bill did not become law - Died in committee.
Procedural history
2 actions- Feb 3, 2026Senate02/03 (S) Died In Committee
- Jan 19, 2026SenateCommittee01/19 (S) Referred To Education
Version history
Only one version on file - nothing to compare yet. As later stages (committee substitute, engrossed, enrolled) are captured, the redline appears here.
View official text →Lobbying Activity
No state lobbying filings in our records match this bill. Federal lobbying reports (LDA) cover Congress, so they are not listed on state bills.
Full breakdown
Who this bill affects and the strongest case for and against it, written only from the bill’s own text.
Sponsors
Connected Entities
Sources
billstatus.ls.state.ms.us
Analysis Score
0–100- Significance20Lowered because this bill did not pass (its text scored 40)
- Controversy10Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
- Entertainment5Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
- Buzz15Current news / social attention level
Publisher tools
