POLISCOPE
Back to bills

The civic record

Read. Follow. Verify.
Enacted

Utah SB 312 establishes tiered employment and volunteer restrictions for disciplined educators

Original title: Educator License Amendments

Last action · March 26, 2026: Governor SignedSponsors: John Johnson and 2 others

Introduced
Committee
Floor Vote
Passed
Law

Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.

What This Bill Does

This bill establishes a tiered framework restricting public school employment and volunteer service for educators facing license denial, suspension, or revocation, requiring automatic work bans for serious misconduct while exempting s. Effective May 6, 2026, the measure also updates due process notice requirements for disciplinary hearings and clarifies restrictions on substitute teachers.

Why it matters

Public schools are barred from hiring or allowing volunteers whose licenses are revoked or suspended for serious misconduct, while technical rule errors no longer trigger automatic work bans without documented patterns and specific risk findings.

Who It Affects

Groups the bill's text affects, as described in the record. Being affected is not a position for or against it.

Directly affected

Educators and License Applicants

Educators facing disciplinary proceedings are subject to new tiered employment and volunteer restrictions, mandatory written risk findings for non-serious infractions, and updated 15-day hearing notice requirements.

Directly affected

Public Schools and LEAs

Schools are prohibited from employing or allowing volunteers who are subject to automatic or finding-backed restrictions following license suspension or revocation.

Directly affected

Utah Professional Practices Advisory Commission

UPPAC is tasked with investigating allegations, holding hearings, providing findings, and making disciplinary recommendations to the state board.

Key Facts

You don't have to trust us. Each fact below is taken straight from the official document - click any one to see the exact passage, highlighted in the original.

Frequently Asked Questions

What conduct triggers an automatic ban on working or volunteering in a public school?
An automatic ban applies if an educator's license is revoked or suspended due to , such as sexual offenses, actual or credible risk of harm to a child, grooming, boundary violations, abuse, or ongoing threats to student safety.
Do administrative errors or paperwork mistakes result in automatic employment bans?
No. s such as administrative, documentation, or record-keeping errors do not trigger automatic employment or volunteer restrictions unless the individual engages in a repeated pattern of violations demonstrating disregard for standards and the state board issues written findings.
How much notice must an educator receive before a disciplinary hearing?
An accused party must be provided with notice of the hearing, the alleged violations, supporting evidence, and a statement regarding potential employment restrictions at least 15 days before the hearing.

What else do you want to know?

News Coverage

No news coverage found yet. Articles are indexed twice daily.

Where This Stands

Current status: Signed into law.

Procedural history

53 actions
  1. Mar 26, 2026Lieutenant Governor's office for filingEnrolled
    Governor Signed
  2. Mar 11, 2026Senate
    Senate/ to Governor
  3. Mar 11, 2026Senate
    Senate/ received enrolled bill from Printing
  4. Mar 10, 2026Senate
    Senate/ enrolled bill to Printing
  5. Mar 10, 2026Senate Secretary
    Enrolled Bill Returned to House or Senate
  6. Mar 6, 2026Legislative Research and General Counsel / Enrolling
    Draft of Enrolled Bill Prepared
Show 47 earlier actions
  1. Mar 6, 2026Legislative Research and General Counsel / Enrolling
    Bill Received from Senate for Enrolling
  2. Mar 6, 2026Senate
    Senate/ signed by President/ sent for enrolling
  3. Mar 6, 2026Senate
    Senate/ received from House
  4. Mar 5, 2026House
    House/ to Senate
  5. Mar 5, 2026House
    House/ signed by Speaker/ returned to Senate
  6. Mar 5, 2026House
    House/ received from Senate
  7. Mar 5, 2026Senate
    Senate/ to House
  8. Mar 5, 2026Senate
    Senate/ concurs with House amendment
  9. Mar 5, 2026Senate
    Senate/ placed on Concurrence Calendar
  10. Mar 5, 2026Senate
    Senate/ received from House
  11. Mar 5, 2026House
    House/ to Senate
  12. Mar 5, 2026HouseFloor
    House/ passed 3rd reading
  13. Mar 5, 2026House
    House/ uncircled
  14. Mar 5, 2026Released
    LFA/ fiscal note publicly available for SB0312S01
  15. Mar 4, 2026House
    House/ circled
  16. Mar 4, 2026House
    House/ 3rd reading
  17. Mar 4, 2026Version Sponsor
    LFA/ fiscal note sent to sponsor for SB0312S01
  18. Mar 4, 2026House
    House/ 2nd reading
  19. Mar 4, 2026House
    House/ Rules to 3rd Reading Calendar
  20. Mar 4, 2026House
    House/ return to Rules due to fiscal impact
  21. Mar 4, 2026House
    House/ comm rpt/ substituted
  22. Mar 4, 2026House
    House Comm - Favorable Recommendation
  23. Mar 4, 2026House
    House Comm - Substitute Recommendation
  24. Mar 4, 2026Legislative Fiscal Agency
    LFA/ bill sent to agencies for fiscal input for SB0312S01
  25. Mar 4, 2026Legislative Fiscal Analyst
    LFA/ bill assigned to staff for fiscal analysis for SB0312S01
  26. Mar 4, 2026House
    House Comm - Held
  27. Mar 3, 2026HouseCommittee
    House/ to standing committee
  28. Mar 3, 2026HouseIntroduced
    House/ 1st reading (Introduced)
  29. Mar 3, 2026House
    House/ received from Senate
  30. Mar 3, 2026Senate
    Senate/ to House
  31. Mar 3, 2026SenateFloor
    Senate/ passed 3rd reading
  32. Mar 3, 2026Senate
    Senate/ 3rd reading
  33. Mar 2, 2026SenateFloor
    Senate/ passed 2nd reading
  34. Mar 2, 2026Senate
    Senate/ 2nd reading
  35. Feb 26, 2026Senate
    Senate/ placed on 2nd Reading Calendar
  36. Feb 26, 2026Senate
    Senate/ committee report favorable
  37. Feb 25, 2026Senate
    Senate Comm - Favorable Recommendation
  38. Feb 25, 2026Senate
    Senate/ received fiscal note from Fiscal Analyst
  39. Feb 25, 2026Released
    LFA/ fiscal note publicly available for SB0312
  40. Feb 24, 2026Version Sponsor
    LFA/ fiscal note sent to sponsor for SB0312
  41. Feb 20, 2026SenateCommittee
    Senate/ to standing committee
  42. Feb 19, 2026SenateIntroduced
    Senate/ 1st reading (Introduced)
  43. Feb 19, 2026Senate
    Senate/ received bill from Legislative Research
  44. Feb 19, 2026Legislative Fiscal Agency
    LFA/ bill sent to agencies for fiscal input for SB0312
  45. Feb 19, 2026Legislative Fiscal Analyst
    LFA/ bill assigned to staff for fiscal analysis for SB0312
  46. Feb 19, 2026Legislative Research and General Counsel
    Numbered Bill Publicly Distributed
  47. Feb 19, 2026Legislative Research and General Counsel
    Bill Numbered but not Distributed

Version history

Only one version on file - nothing to compare yet. As later stages (committee substitute, engrossed, enrolled) are captured, the redline appears here.

View official text →

Lobbying Activity

No state lobbying filings in our records match this bill. Federal lobbying reports (LDA) cover Congress, so they are not listed on state bills.

Full breakdown

Who this bill affects and the strongest case for and against it, written only from the bill’s own text.

Sponsors

Discoveries

1 pattern noticed across the record

Patterns POLISCOPE noticed across the record. These are observations to investigate, not conclusions.

policy shift98% confidence

Introduction of Tiered Disciplinary Restrictions

The bill shifts from broad discretionary restrictions to a codified tiered framework that separates serious child-harm misconduct from minor technical paperwork errors.

Connected Entities

John D. Johnson, UPPAC, Karianne Lisonbee and 2 more
PersonJohn D. Johnson“Chief sponsor of SB 312 in the Utah Senate.”Map →
OrganizationUPPAC“Utah Professional Practices Advisory Commission, responsible for investigating e”Map →
PersonKarianne Lisonbee“Co-sponsor of SB 312.”Map →
PersonDoug Welton“House sponsor of SB 312.”Map →
OrganizationUtah State Board of Education“State board responsible for educator licensure, discipline, and rule-making.”Map →

Sources

Analysis Score

0–100
  • Significance75
    How much this matters to a regular citizen
  • Controversy30
    Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
  • Entertainment10
    Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
  • Buzz25
    Current news / social attention level

Publisher tools

Share or embed this record

POLISCOPE publisher tools

Share or embed this record