The civic record
Read. Follow. Verify.Texas House Bill 69 requires in-person physician exams for abortion-inducing drugs
Last action · July 14, 2025: FiledSponsor: Ellen Troxclair
Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.
What This Bill Proposed
Relating to the provision of an abortion-inducing drug.
Changes the legal requirements for medication abortion access by prohibiting remote or out-of-state prescriptions for s, affecting how physicians statewide and across borders must deliver these services.
Who It Would Have Affected
Groups the bill's text would have affected, as described in the record. Being affected is not a position for or against it.
physicians
Physicians must be physically present in Texas and examine patients in person when providing abortion-inducing drugs, losing prior telemedicine or out-of-state consultation exemptions for these medications.
pregnant women
Pregnant women seeking abortion-inducing drugs must undergo an in-person examination by a physician physically present in the state.
Key Facts
You don't have to trust us. Each fact below is taken straight from the official document - click any one to see the exact passage, highlighted in the original.
Frequently Asked Questions
Can an out-of-state physician prescribe an abortion-inducing drug remotely to a patient in Texas?
What else do you want to know?
News Coverage
Follow the record
Votes, people, money & the original sourceWhere This Stands
This bill did not become law - Died at adjournment · introduced in the House.
Procedural history
1 action- Jul 14, 2025HouseIntroducedFiled
Version history
Only one version on file - nothing to compare yet. As later stages (committee substitute, engrossed, enrolled) are captured, the redline appears here.
View official text →Lobbying Activity
No state lobbying filings in our records match this bill. Federal lobbying reports (LDA) cover Congress, so they are not listed on state bills.
Full breakdown
Who this bill affects and the strongest case for and against it, written only from the bill’s own text.
Sponsors
Connected Entities
Sources
capitol.texas.gov
Analysis Score
0–100- Significance20Lowered because this bill did not pass (its text scored 85)
- Controversy90Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
- Entertainment10Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
- Buzz65Current news / social attention level
Publisher tools
