POLISCOPE
Back to bills

The civic record

Read. Follow. Verify.
Did Not Advance

Texas House Bill 69 requires in-person physician exams for abortion-inducing drugs

Original title: Relating to the provision of an abortion-inducing drug.

Last action · July 14, 2025: FiledSponsor: Ellen Troxclair

Introduced
Committee
Floor Vote
Passed
Law

Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.

Public stanceCommunity reactions are separate from the official record and reporting.

What This Bill Proposed

Official description

Relating to the provision of an abortion-inducing drug.

Why it matters

Changes the legal requirements for medication abortion access by prohibiting remote or out-of-state prescriptions for s, affecting how physicians statewide and across borders must deliver these services.

Who It Would Have Affected

Groups the bill's text would have affected, as described in the record. Being affected is not a position for or against it.

Directly affected

physicians

Physicians must be physically present in Texas and examine patients in person when providing abortion-inducing drugs, losing prior telemedicine or out-of-state consultation exemptions for these medications.

Directly affected

pregnant women

Pregnant women seeking abortion-inducing drugs must undergo an in-person examination by a physician physically present in the state.

Key Facts

You don't have to trust us. Each fact below is taken straight from the official document - click any one to see the exact passage, highlighted in the original.

Frequently Asked Questions

Can an out-of-state physician prescribe an abortion-inducing drug remotely to a patient in Texas?
No. House Bill 69 removes out-of-state consultation exemptions for s and requires the prescribing physician to be physically present in Texas and conduct an in-person examination.

What else do you want to know?

News Coverage

No news coverage found yet. Articles are indexed twice daily.

Where This Stands

This bill did not become law - Died at adjournment · introduced in the House.

Procedural history

1 action
  1. Jul 14, 2025HouseIntroduced
    Filed

Version history

Only one version on file - nothing to compare yet. As later stages (committee substitute, engrossed, enrolled) are captured, the redline appears here.

View official text →

Lobbying Activity

No state lobbying filings in our records match this bill. Federal lobbying reports (LDA) cover Congress, so they are not listed on state bills.

Full breakdown

Who this bill affects and the strongest case for and against it, written only from the bill’s own text.

Sponsors

Connected Entities

Ellen Troxclair, Education Code
PersonEllen Troxclair“Bill author and sponsor in the lower house”Map →
OrganizationEducation Code“Cited regarding medical schools and institutional definitions”Map →

Sources

Open source document

capitol.texas.gov

Analysis Score

0–100
  • Significance20
    Lowered because this bill did not pass (its text scored 85)
  • Controversy90
    Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
  • Entertainment10
    Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
  • Buzz65
    Current news / social attention level

Publisher tools

Share or embed this record

POLISCOPE publisher tools

Share or embed this record