POLISCOPE
Back to bills

The civic record

Read. Follow. Verify.

Delaware Substitute House Bill 442 Expands Electronic Traffic Monitoring and Removes Speed Camera Sunset

Original title: AN ACT TO AMEND TITLE 21 OF THE DELAWARE CODE RELATING TO TRAFFIC MONITORING SYSTEMS.

Last action · June 16, 2026: Adopted in lieu of the original bill HB 442, and Assigned to Appropriations Committee in HouseSponsor: Ed Osienski

Introduced
Committee
Floor Vote
Passed
Law

Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.

What This Bill Would Do

Delaware HB 442 creates a new chapter in allowing electronic monitoring systems for all traffic violations, removes the existing on speed monitoring systems, and introduces a new 10-year sunset for the substitute bill.

Why it matters

Counties and municipalities with police departments gain the authority to place traffic monitoring systems and collect the resulting revenue, while courts may use these funds to cover appeal costs.

Who It Would Affect

Groups the bill's text would affect if enacted, as described in the record. Being affected is not a position for or against it.

Directly affected

Motorists in Delaware

Drivers are subject to potential citations and warning periods from newly authorized electronic traffic monitoring systems for all violations.

Directly affected

County and municipal police departments

Local law enforcement jurisdictions gain the ability to place traffic monitoring systems and receive associated revenue.

Directly affected

Delaware courts

Courts handling traffic citation appeals may use traffic monitoring revenue to reimburse their operational costs.

Key Facts

You don't have to trust us. Each fact below is taken straight from the official document - click any one to see the exact passage, highlighted in the original.

Frequently Asked Questions

What types of traffic violations can electronic monitoring systems be used for under this bill?
The bill allows electronic monitoring systems to be used for all traffic violations.
Do drivers receive immediate fines when a traffic violation monitoring system catches an infraction?
No, the bill requires a regulatory warning period to be provided before citations can be issued.
Who receives the revenue generated by the traffic monitoring systems?
Counties and municipalities with a county or municipal police department are allowed to receive revenue from traffic monitoring systems placed within their jurisdiction.

What else do you want to know?

News Coverage

No news coverage found yet. Articles are indexed twice daily.

Where This Stands

Currently in committee. The next step in the legislative lifecycle is Floor Vote.

Procedural history

1 action
  1. Jun 16, 2026HouseIntroduced
    Adopted in lieu of the original bill HB 442, and Assigned to Appropriations Committee in House

Version history

Only one version on file - nothing to compare yet. As later stages (committee substitute, engrossed, enrolled) are captured, the redline appears here.

View official text →

Lobbying Activity

No state lobbying filings in our records match this bill. Federal lobbying reports (LDA) cover Congress, so they are not listed on state bills.

Full breakdown

Who this bill affects and the strongest case for and against it, written only from the bill’s own text.

Sponsors

Discoveries

1 pattern noticed across the record

Patterns POLISCOPE noticed across the record. These are observations to investigate, not conclusions.

policy shift95% confidence

Expansion of Automated Traffic Enforcement

The legislation broadens automated monitoring from strictly speed monitoring to all traffic violations while removing prior sunset limits.

Connected Entities

Appropriations Committee, Title 21, Edward S. Osienski
OrganizationAppropriations Committee“House committee assigned to review the bill”Map →
otherTitle 21“Delaware Code pertaining to motor vehicles”Map →
PersonEdward S. Osienski“Democratic Representative for District 24”Map →

Sources

Open source document

legis.delaware.gov

Analysis Score

0–100
  • Significance20
    Lowered because this bill did not pass (its text scored 65)
  • Controversy50
    Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
  • Entertainment10
    Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
  • Buzz35
    Current news / social attention level

Publisher tools

Share or embed this record

POLISCOPE publisher tools

Share or embed this record