POLISCOPE
Back to bills

The civic record

Read. Follow. Verify.
Did Not Advance

Kentucky House Bill 777 Regulates Sports Wagering Limits, Appeal Processes, and Online Account Requirements

Original title: AN ACT relating to sports wagering.

Last action · March 6, 2026: to Licensing, Occupations, & Administrative Regulations (H)Sponsors: Nick Wilson and 1 other

Introduced
Committee
Floor Vote
Passed
Law

Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.

What This Bill Proposed

Kentucky HB 777 restricts sports wagering operators from limiting customer deposits or bets based on winnings unless tied to suspicious activity or problem gambling, and it establishes mandatory notification, appeal procedures, and a minimum wagering age of 21.

Why it matters

Sports bettors gain the right to receive electronic notice within 24 hours of account restrictions along with an established appeal process, while online operators must implement technology and maintain servers within the state.

Background
  • Sports wagering in Kentucky was previously authorized and established under existing state statutes, which this bill proposes to amend with additional consumer and operational requirements. context

Who It Would Have Affected

Groups the bill's text would have affected, as described in the record. Being affected is not a position for or against it.

Directly affected

sports bettors

Players gain protections against arbitrary wagering limits, mandatory 24-hour notifications for account restrictions, and a formal appeal process.

Directly affected

sports wagering licensees and service providers

Operators must comply with new restrictions on limiting winning accounts, establish appeal frameworks, issue 24-hour notices, and enforce the age-21 threshold.

Directly affected

persons under the age of twenty-one

Individuals aged 18 to 20 are explicitly prohibited from participating in sports wagering.

Key Facts

You don't have to trust us. Each fact below is taken straight from the official document - click any one to see the exact passage, highlighted in the original.

Frequently Asked Questions

Can sports betting operators limit my account because I am winning too much?
No. Under the bill, operators cannot limit the size or frequency of your deposits or wagers simply because you obtained a financial benefit, unless your activity constitutes suspicious wagering or indicates problem gambling.
What must an operator do if they ban or restrict my account?
They must send you an electronic notification within 24 hours specifying the restriction, the reason, the duration, how to appeal, and a link to problem gambling resources if applicable.
What is the minimum age to engage in sports wagering under this bill?
The minimum age is twenty-one years old.

What else do you want to know?

News Coverage

No news coverage found yet. Articles are indexed twice daily.

Where This Stands

This bill did not become law - Died at adjournment · in House committee.

Procedural history

2 actions
  1. Mar 6, 2026HouseCommittee
    to Licensing, Occupations, & Administrative Regulations (H)
  2. Feb 27, 2026HouseIntroduced
    introduced in House to Committee on Committees (H)

Version history

Only one version on file - nothing to compare yet. As later stages (committee substitute, engrossed, enrolled) are captured, the redline appears here.

View official text →

Lobbying Activity

No state lobbying filings in our records match this bill. Federal lobbying reports (LDA) cover Congress, so they are not listed on state bills.

Full breakdown

Who this bill affects and the strongest case for and against it, written only from the bill’s own text.

Sponsors

Discoveries

1 pattern noticed across the record

Patterns POLISCOPE noticed across the record. These are observations to investigate, not conclusions.

policy shift95% confidence

Codification of Sports Betting Consumer Protections

The bill shifts legislative focus toward curbing arbitrary account restrictions on winning sports bettors and enforcing strict notification and appeal mandates.

Connected Entities

Nick Wilson, General Assembly, Al Gentry and 1 more
PersonNick Wilson“Primary sponsor of HB 777”Map →
OrganizationGeneral Assembly“Legislative body enacting the bill”Map →
PersonAl Gentry“Cosponsor of HB 777”Map →
OrganizationKentucky Cabinet for Health and Family Services“State agency providing problem gambling program resources”Map →

Sources

Open source document

apps.legislature.ky.gov

Analysis Score

0–100
  • Significance20
    Lowered because this bill did not pass (its text scored 65)
  • Controversy40
    Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
  • Entertainment10
    Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
  • Buzz35
    Current news / social attention level

Publisher tools

Share or embed this record

POLISCOPE publisher tools

Share or embed this record