POLISCOPE
Back to bills

The civic record

Read. Follow. Verify.
Did Not Advance

Minnesota House Bill 202 modifies highway interchange funding in Scott County and authorizes sign lighting

Original title: Scott County; U.S. Highway 169 and Trunk Highway 282 interchange construction appropriation modified, lighting of city identification sign authorized, and money appropriated.

Last action · March 20, 2025: HF indefinitely postponedSponsors: Ben Bakeberg and 1 other

Introduced
Committee
Floor Vote
Passed
Law

Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.

Public stanceCommunity reactions are separate from the official record and reporting.

What This Bill Proposed

Minnesota House Bill 202 modifies a $4,900,000 for U.S. Highway 169 and Trunk Highway 282 interchange improvements in Scott County by removing the grant structure to Scott County, and requires the commissioner of transportation to authorize lighting for a city identification sign in Shakopee.

Why it matters

Changes the administrative mechanism for a $4,900,000 state transportation and shifts sign maintenance costs to a local municipality, affecting local road and infrastructure management in Scott County.

Background
  • HF 202 was introduced in the 94th Minnesota legislative session as a bill modifying previous transportation appropriations. context

Who It Would Have Affected

Groups the bill's text would have affected, as described in the record. Being affected is not a position for or against it.

Directly affected

Scott County

The requirement that funds be structured as a grant to the county is removed from the appropriation statute.

Directly affected

city of Shakopee

The city becomes responsible for the costs to install and maintain lighting on its identification sign.

Directly affected

commissioner of transportation

The commissioner must authorize sign lighting and administer the modified highway construction appropriation.

Key Facts

You don't have to trust us. Each fact below is taken straight from the official document - click any one to see the exact passage, highlighted in the original.

Frequently Asked Questions

Who is responsible for paying for the Shakopee identification sign lighting?
The city of Shakopee is responsible for the cost to install and maintain the lighting.
What is the timeline for the $4,900,000 transportation appropriation?
It is a from fiscal year 2024 that remains available until June 30, 2027.

What else do you want to know?

News Coverage

No news coverage found yet. Articles are indexed twice daily.

Where This Stands

This bill did not become law - Died in committee.

Procedural history

9 actions
  1. Mar 20, 2025House
    HF indefinitely postponed
  2. Mar 20, 2025House
    Bills not identical, SF substituted on General Register
  3. Mar 17, 2025HouseCommittee
    Referred to Chief Clerk for comparison with SF823
  4. Mar 17, 2025House
    House rule 1.21, placed on Calendar for the Day Monday, March 17, 2025
  5. Mar 10, 2025HouseFloor
    Second reading
  6. Mar 10, 2025House
    Committee report, to adopt as amended
Show 3 earlier actions
  1. Feb 13, 2025HouseCommittee
    Motion to recall and re-refer, motion prevailed Transportation Finance and Policy
  2. Feb 13, 2025House
    Author added Tabke
  3. Feb 10, 2025HouseIntroduced
    Introduction and first reading, referred to Capital Investment

Version history

Only one version on file - nothing to compare yet. As later stages (committee substitute, engrossed, enrolled) are captured, the redline appears here.

View official text →

Lobbying Activity

No state lobbying filings in our records match this bill. Federal lobbying reports (LDA) cover Congress, so they are not listed on state bills.

Full breakdown

Who this bill affects and the strongest case for and against it, written only from the bill’s own text.

Sponsors

Connected Entities

Jordan, Scott County, Shakopee
locationJordan“City where the interchange improvements are located”Map →
locationScott County“Location of the highway interchange project”Map →
locationShakopee“City responsible for sign installation and maintenance costs”Map →

Sources

Open source document

www.revisor.mn.gov

Analysis Score

0–100
  • Significance20
    Lowered because this bill did not pass (its text scored 35)
  • Controversy10
    Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
  • Entertainment5
    Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
  • Buzz15
    Current news / social attention level

Publisher tools

Share or embed this record

POLISCOPE publisher tools

Share or embed this record